Overview

Hi, I got the error( IAPError(code: storekit_no_response, source: app_store, message: StoreKit: Failed to get response from platform., details: null) ) when run the code ( final InAppPurchase _iap = InAppPurchase.instance; Set kids = {‘some_available_product_id’} _iap.queryProductDetails(_kIds); ) from flutter I don’t know why this happened, can you let me know this?

May I ask if there is a complete source code project for this instructional video that needs to be learned. Work with Reality Composer Pro content in Xcode

Since a few days ago, I noticed that every time you go to the top of the text in the Agentic Coding chat box, if you keep pressing the up arrow, the current message is replaced by the previous one. It's like someone decided to allow users to use the arrows to navigate to previous conversations in the same context, but this means that you are constantly jumping to previous messages by accident. The "feature" is error prone, confusing, and extremely annoying. If someone knows of an option in setting to disable it, please let me know. I'm constantly making mistakes, wasting tokens, editing the wrong message, and making the conversation confusing by sending the wrong message to the agent.

The first review was on May 5th and got rejection with 2.1 (b) and 3.1.2(c). I took my time to localize screenshots, app metadata, and the subscription pricing and re-submitted for review (also replied to the early rejection) on May 10th. It's been more than 48 hours, but the status is still 'waiting for review'. I wonder if it's normal or if I should reply to the rejection again? Thanks!

forum-post-v2-evidence.log MCRestrictionsPayload (allowListedAppBundleIDs) breaks Apple Watch app enumeration — nanotimekitcompaniond reports "Missing .app from directory: /Watch/" Summary Installing a Configuration Profile with com.apple.applicationaccess payload containing allowListedAppBundleIDs causes native Apple Watch apps to disappear from the paired Watch — even when their bundle IDs are explicitly in the whitelist. Log analysis shows this is not a bundle ID matching problem: nanotimekitcompaniond on the iPhone fails to enumerate the <companion>.app/Watch/ subdirectories where native watchOS app stubs live. Follow-up to https://developer.apple.com/forums/thread/745585 — community-confirmed but received no official response. Environment iPhone 16 (iPhone17,3), iOS 26.4.2 (23E261), supervised Apple Watch paired via Bridge.app Profile installed locally via Apple Configurator (no MDM server required) Smoking gun Within ~5 seconds of profile install, two processes (nanotimekitcompaniond and NTKFaceSnapshotService) log identical errors for eight companion-app paths: nanotimekitcompaniond[1498] <Error>: Missing .app from directory: file:///Applications/MobilePhone.app/Watch/ nanotimekitcompaniond[1498] <Error>: Missing .app from directory: .../Calculator.app/Watch/ nanotimekitcompaniond[1498] <Error>: Missing .app from directory: .../Bridge.app/Watch/ nanotimekitcompaniond[1498] <Error>: Missing .app from directory: .../MobileTimer.app/Watch/ nanotimekitcompaniond[1498] <Error>: Missing .app from directory: .../Camera.app/Watch/ nanotimekitcompaniond[1498] <Error>: Missing .app from directory: .../VoiceMemos.app/Watch/ nanotimekitcompaniond[1498] <Error>: Missing .app from directory: .../MobileMail.app/Watch/ nanotimekitcompaniond[1498] <Error>: Missing .app from directory: .../FindMy.app/Watch/ NTKFaceSnapshotService[3758] <Error>: Missing .app from directory: <same 8 paths> The Watch's app icons and face complications both go through these processes, which explains the symptoms users see. iOS itself flags the payload as Watch-incompatible — but applies it anyway profiled[179] <Notice>: Payload class MCRestrictionsPayload (com.apple.applicationaccess) is not supported on any Watch version profiled[179] <Notice>: Payload class MCRestrictionsPayload (com.apple.applicationaccess) is not available on HomePod profiled[179] <Notice>: Beginning profile installation... profiled[179] <Notice>: Profile "...v2..." installed. So profiled knows the payload doesn't target watchOS — yet its side effects clearly manifest there. Tests performed Test Bundle IDs in whitelist Result v1 249 (every installed iOS app: Apple + 3rd party) Walkie-Talkie, Messages, Find My + more disappear from Watch v2 295 (v1 + every Apple extension/Nano* daemon seen in syslog: *.MessagesActionExtension, *.FindMyNotifications*Extension, *.FindMyWidget*, com.apple.NanoBackup, com.apple.NanoMusicSync, com.apple.NanoPreferencesSync, com.apple.NanoTimeKit.face, com.apple.NanoUniverse.AegirProxyApp, com.apple.tursd, com.apple.FaceTime.FTConversationService, com.apple.Bridge.GreenfieldThumbnailExtension, etc.) Identical Missing-.app errors. Same apps disappear. Conclusion: this is not a bundle ID matching issue — adding more IDs doesn't help. The system fails to enumerate <companion-iOS-app>.app/Watch/ regardless of whitelist contents. Many users in my prior thread reported trying 100+ bundle ID combinations without success; this evidence explains why. Reproduction (no MDM required) Pair Apple Watch with iPhone normally. Generate a Configuration Profile with com.apple.applicationaccess + any non-empty allowListedAppBundleIDs array. Install via Apple Configurator's cfgutil install-profile, or AirDrop + Settings → Install. Within ~5 s, nanotimekitcompaniond errors appear (visible via idevicesyslog). Native Watch apps backed by an iOS companion stub disappear from the Watch's app grid and from face complications. Hypothesis MCRestrictionsPayload applies an enumeration filter that does not descend into .app/Watch/ subdirectories when computing visible apps. nanotimekitcompaniond consequently sees those directories as missing, the Watch's Carousel (SpringBoard equivalent) hides the apps, and NTKFaceSnapshotService can't load corresponding complications. Because profiled itself logs the payload as "not supported on any Watch version", this appears to be unintended bleed-through. Questions for Apple Is MCRestrictionsPayload / allowListedAppBundleIDs officially supposed to affect Apple Watch apps? profiled says no. Is there an undocumented bundle ID pattern (e.g. <companion>.watchapp, or a Bridge.app/Watch/ prefix) that needs whitelisting to keep native Watch apps visible? Is the recommended workaround to use blacklistedAppBundleIDs instead? Should the enumeration error (Missing .app from directory: .../Watch/) be tracked as a separate watchOS framework bug? Artifacts Curated evidence log with timestamps, profile installer events, and the eight Missing-.app errors is attached as forum-post-v2-evidence.log. Full idevicesyslog captures (multiple install/remove cycles, ~2M log lines) and the .mobileconfig files are available on request. Thanks — looking forward to guidance.

So i submitted my app what seems like a dozen times now and they keep rejecting it due to Guidelines 5.1.1(i) - Privacy - Data Collection and 5.1.2(i) - Legal - Privacy - Data. The full section is: Issue Description The app appears to share the user’s personal data with a third-party AI service but the app does not clearly explain what data is sent, identify who the data is sent to, and ask the user’s permission before sharing the data. Apps may only use, transmit, or share personal data after they meet all of the following requirements: - Disclose what data will be sent - Specify who the data is sent to - Obtain the user’s permission before sending data - Identify in the privacy policy what data the app collects, how it collects that data, all uses of that data, and confirm any third party the app shares data with provides the same or equal protection Next Steps If the app sends user data to a third-party AI service, revise the app to explain what data is sent, identify who the data is sent to, and ask the user’s permission before sharing personal data with a third-party AI service. If it does not already, the app’s privacy policy must also identify what data the app collects, how it collects that data, and all uses of that data, including if it is shared with a third-party AI service. Note that only including this information in the app's Terms of Service or Privacy Policy is not sufficient. If the app does not send user data to a third-party AI service or does not include a third-party AI service, reply to this rejection to confirm and add this information to the App Review Information section of App Store Connect. So i did this. My app uses 3rd party Ai services for facial scans and Ai morph features. Ive explained what data is used, what data i sent, etc. This is in my Privacy Policy and ive aded a section in both pages for Scans and Ai Morph since they are 2 seperate operations, but there a notification that pops up when the user first uses the feature and on the same screen theres a text that says 'By using Facial Scanning you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms" and the same for Ai Morph except it says Ai Morph Feature and not face scan.. And yet Apple keeps rejecting it. So what else do they require me to do?

I submitted my paperwork on May 5 to development support to verify my organization and my signing ability for my organization and I have not heard anything back to this day. I know that these things are supposed to only take two business days. So I’ve also emailed and have not heard back. Has anybody ever had these issues before? And is there a way to contact Apple that’s not requesting a phone call I work full-time and cannot receive phone calls while I’m at work so that’s not a feasible option for me. Hopefully somebody will see this from support and respond to my emails and or submission.

My tvOS app includes the purchase of subscriptions, and I am updating the code with Storekit 2.0. I have seen other apps that present the "Confirm with Apple Device" UI upon selection of a product, but for me I only ever see an alert confirming the purchase. I have tested this using Xcode storekit data and a sandbox account. I have also attempted using Storekit views and passing the UIWindowScene to the purchase(confirmIn: ) parameter, but neither made any difference. Is there some limitation that prevents that UI from showing in debug builds?

I have been attempting to contact development support regarding verification of my organization in my signing ability on behalf of my organization because my account has not been. My initial filing was on May 5 for my new reference number because my first one got declined the developer portal as that it should only take two business days, but it is definitely taking a lot longer than that to verify my business. has anybody had this sort of issue before and is there a phone number to actually contact because the email process also seems to be delayed at this point in time. I work full-time and cannot receive phone calls during the day so putting in a ticket for someone to call me is not feasible. Hopefully somebody from the sports team will see this post and reach out to me and give me a way to contact Apple development support so I can get this finalized.

Currently our app Juris: Learn the Law has consumable IAPs available publicly. We've recently added a subscription to a new update, but since we already added consumable IAPs, we can only submit new IAP on their own and cannot attach it to a new binary. The issue is that when we submit the subscription for review, it gets rejected and the reviewers respond that the subscription needs to be included with a new binary, even though we can't attached it to a new binary. We submitted a new binary at the same time we submitted a new subscription, but the new binary would be approved and the subscription would be rejected. The update with the subscription is available, but the subscription isn't, meaning users cannot use the new features which require the subscription.

We are implementing starting an activity via Push-To-Start. For the most part it works great, however we have run into a few edge cases. Currently, we send the "start activity" push notification and it creates the Activity as expected. If the app doesn't send an update token w/in a configured time, we assume the activity didn't start and try to start the activity again. Occasionally we get into a situation where there have been multiple activities started, but it should really only be one. Here is my theory: We store an auth token in the keychain for all REST endpoints if the phone has been restarted and not unlocked, the app doesn't have access to the auth token and fails to send the update token to our backend. Are there any best practices on how to manage PTS and UPDATE tokens? (updating these w/o authentication seems problematic)

I've added two new users to our App Store connect account but when they follow the link in the invitation email, they're taken to a blank white page in their browser. I've had them try with an incognito browser and cleared their browsing data but have had no luck. We stopped trying for a few weeks and today, I sent a new invitation and they experienced the same issue. Can't seem to nail down why this is happening.

For many months now we've been building a watchOS app with push support. On device, these usually work fine, but in the sim, only loud pushes are ever received (don't contain content-available). This includes pushes triggered from our backend, whether directly or through Firebase Cloud Messaging, from Apple push web interface, from apns files dropped onto the sim, or from files sent using simctl push. All say they were sent successfully, none trigger any of the push related WKApplicationDelegate methods. As I understand it, only didReceiveRemoteNotification should be triggered for this kind of push. Additionally, can anyone confirm what the proper background mode setup is for push notifications on watchOS? Is it supposed to remote-notification under UIBackgroundModes or WKBackgroundModes? For WKBackgroundModes Xcode only offers a few watch specific values, but not the push value. The docs are unclear on this part.

Hello juice community. firts of all, i'm brazilian dev, soo this conversation will be a lot errors of english. but i'm think is a nice to prove is not a AI generate post here. hehe I want a big tip, how i integrate my app in the fruit ecosystem. Soo, i launch a AI prompt plataform, the idea is make users your own prompt, you make a context for him, like " you are a food master chief", and configure the inputs, like a photo of your freezer, to the AI take the ingredients e make a recipe with AI. The aplication is infinite! The integration, now, is with AI provider. the idea is not make a context with complex Skills.sh, but the common user create your own Prompt/AI and feel a prompt engineer master. i'm think the is a powerful plataform for native apple system. the plataform has url, and if any one has interesting a will chat in the comments the name for see how beaut is.

I'm adding live activities to my app and I'm trying to use push notifications to fully remotely start them and end them. The pushToStartTokenUpdates sequence gives start tokens exactly as expected, and triggers even when the app is fully terminated when a new live activity starts. However, the pushTokenUpdates sequence is far less predictable and seems to never trigger when the app is fully terminated. Even when the app is just backgrounded, it's still finicky. I send the "input-push-token": 1 as part of the aps payload too to begin the live activity, but that seems to have little to no effect. Is there any way to ensure that we can receive a push token specifically to update the live activity after it starts? It seems to me that if a live activity can be started via push even when the app is fully terminated, and live activities are meant to reflect active information, then the mechanism to update it via a new token should also be able to work when the app is terminated. Both sequences are subscribed to within the AppDelegate upon initial app launch. This is what my code looks like at the moment: func application(_ application: UIApplication, didFinishLaunchingWithOptions launchOptions: [UIApplication.LaunchOptionsKey: Any]?) -> Bool { Task { for await newToken in Activity<WidgetAttributes>.pushToStartTokenUpdates { let tokenString = newToken.map{ String(format: "%02x", $0) }.joined() // send to server } } Task { for await activity in Activity<WidgetAttributes>.activityUpdates { Task { for await token in activity.pushTokenUpdates { let tokenString = token.map { String(format: "%02x", $0) }.joined() // send to server } } } } } } Thanks in advance for any insights!

Our application currently supports Live Activities. We’re working on adding a new Widget and are weighing some architectural decisions regarding whether we should add it to the same extension target that our Live Activity lives in or create a new extension that would expose it and other widgets we plan to create in the future. In the Add Support for Live Activities documentation, it suggests adding Live Activity code to the existing widget extension to facilitate code reuse. Beyond code sharing, we’re trying to determine if there are downsides to isolating new Widget(s) into their own extension. Specifically, we are concerned about process isolation and how a failure/crash in one might impact the other. Assuming they did live in the same extension, we’re hoping to better understand some of the finer details as presented by the following questions: If a Widget (e.g., via the TimelineProvider) causes the extension process to crash, what is the guaranteed behavior for a currently running Live Activity? Is the relaunch and restoration of a Live Activity after an extension crash guaranteed, or is it best-effort? Is there a distinction in crash isolation between a TimelineProvider failure and a View rendering crash? Are there any known scenarios where a Widget crash could cause a Live Activity to be permanently dropped? Does keeping them in the same extension affect the memory budget, or does each 'instance' receive its own allocation? In short: we're looking to ensure that an issue with a Widget doesn't inadvertently affect a Live Activity (or vice-versa) when they live in the same WidgetsBundle within the same extension and are seeking guidance on whether it makes sense to keep them together or continue down the path of separate extensions in the interest of process safety. Any pointers to other documentation or known behavior would be greatly appreciated!

Hey everyone, hoping someone here has seen this one because Apple support has basically gone silent on me at this point. Quick rundown of the situation: I submitted my app for review for the first time about 2 weeks ago, with my in app subscriptions attached to that first binary. That worked exactly like it's supposed to, subs and binary went into review together. The binary got rejected and the subs got rejected with it. Since then, every single time I create a new app version, the option to submit my subscriptions alongside it just isn't there. There's no "attach subscriptions" prompt anywhere in the new version's submission flow. So the only way I can actually submit the subs is on their own, straight from the Subscriptions page. And every time I do that, they come back rejected for one reason only, that they need to be submitted with a new app version. Which I literally cannot do, because that UI option doesn't appear in my ASC anymore. It worked the first time, and ever since that very first rejection it's just vanished from my account. What I've already tried: Multiple new builds over the past 2 weeks, each one addressing every bit of review feedback Bumping the version number a full major release (1.x to 2.0) incase ASC was caching something Leaving detailed review notes asking them to please review the subs alongside the current binary even though they aren't formally tied to it Including screen recordings in App Review Notes showing the option just isn't there on my end Submitting through the developer contact form, multiple times. Replying directly in Resolution Center on the rejection itself The usual stuff, refresh, clear cache, different browsers, Safari and Chrome. Same result everytime Honestly I'm fairly demoralised at this point. The hard part is that this is me costing real money for every day it drags on, users genuinely cannot upgrade to a paid plan because the subs aren't live, and as a 18 year old solo dev this aint easy. My actual question is, has anyone here run into this specific thing where the "attach subscriptions to a new version" option just disappears from ASC after the first rejection? Is there a known workaround, or a particular contact form topic that actually gets a human response within a reasonable timeframe? With all this being said I could be a complete idiot and theres something im missing and thats why its not working. If thats the case please just tell me im being stupid and that im missing something because i deserve it lowkey... I've even started thinking about deleting the subs and recreating them from scratch as a complete last resort, but that feels nuclear and I'd rather try anything else first. All help would be greatly appreciated thanks everyone 😄

Our app was approved for distribution yesterday, however our In-App Purchase subscription products have been in Waiting for Review status for several months, without the ability or option to manually connect to the app when submitting for review. As a result the App Store is incorrectly displaying our app as a $6.99 one-time purchase instead of Free with In-App Purchases. What can be done to connect the app to the subscriptions.

Hi everyone, I’m facing a very specific issue with our business location on Apple Maps. In the Apple Business Connect dashboard, our name is correctly set as "ANLOG Lojistik". It also appears correctly within the Apple Maps app itself. However, when we share the location via WhatsApp or iMessage, the "Preview Card" (Metadata) displays the name as "Anlog LojİStİK". It seems like a character rendering bug (specifically with Turkish character case sensitivity). Even standard characters like 'S' and 'K' are being forced into uppercase randomly. When you click the link, it opens correctly in Apple Maps, but the preview remains broken. Apple Support says "it's a 3rd party app issue," but this happens because the LPMetadataProvider fetches this specific data from Apple servers. Has anyone experienced a metadata sync/cache issue like this before? How can we force Apple to refresh the "Place Card" preview data?

Hi everyone, I’d appreciate guidance on a 2.5.2 rejection. My app was rejected with this message: “During review, the app installed or launched executable code. Specifically, the app allows users to install apps created by other users.” What my app actually does: Users create/share tool templates (not binaries/plugins). A template contains only: form configuration (text fields, dropdowns, checkboxes, sliders, etc.) At runtime, placeholders like #TextField are replaced with user input, then the final prompt is sent to a server for AI response. *The iOS app does not download/install/execute native code, scripts, frameworks, or dynamic modules on-device. I suspect review interpreted the word “install” in my UI as real app/code installation anyone knows what can i do to fix this problem. thank you,