Hi Apple Developer Support / community, I am seeing a URL filter startup failure only in TestFlight builds. The same code path works in development and Ad Hoc builds. App setup: Host app bundle id: com.expleo.protectus.filter.main URL filter control extension bundle id: com.expleo.protectus.filter.main.buf Extension point: com.apple.networkextension.url-filter-control Using NEURLFilterManager / NEURLFilterControlProvider on iOS 26.x App Group and network extension entitlements are configured on host + extension Observed behavior: Extension process starts successfully (pid created) Status changes to starting Then updatePrefilterWithCompletionHandler runs Immediately after, plugin transitions to stopping with error 3 System retries in a loop Key logs: Error Domain=NEAgentURLFilterErrorDomain Code=3 Failed to startFilter NEPIRChecker start block reports: Error Domain=com.apple.CipherML Code=1100 Underlying Error Domain=com.apple.CipherML Code=1800 Message says details are redacted Example sequence: NEURLFilterPlugin ... started with pid ... status changed to starting updatePrefilterWithCompletionHandler enter acceptAgentClients enter setStatus:error ... NEAgentURLFilterErrorDomain Code=3 status changed to stopping with error 3 extension disposed / teardown repeats Important detail: This failure is reproducible in TestFlight only. Same code and configuration works in development and Ad Hoc builds. What we already checked: Extension launches and is discovered correctly by neagent App/extension bundle identifiers are correct App group and network extension entitlements are present in source and archive checks We tested startup gating around local bloom/prefilter readiness We still get NEMembershipCheckerErrorDomain Code=3 with CipherML 1100/1800 in TestFlight Questions: Is NEMembershipCheckerErrorDomain Code=3 in this startup path known to indicate PIR membership/status validation failure in distribution context? Are there TestFlight-specific prerequisites or server-side requirements for PIR/CipherML path that differ from development/Ad Hoc? Is there any supported way to get non-redacted diagnostic details for CipherML 1100/1800 (beyond sysdiagnose submission)? Are there recommended fail-open/fail-closed startup patterns when PIR status is temporarily unavailable? If needed, I can provide: Full sysdiagnose timestamped bundle Exact iOS version and device model Repro steps from clean install Full log stream around NEPIRChecker and NEURLFilterPlugin transitions Thanks in advance.

Hi team, Earlier, Apple’s documentation clearly mentioned that we needed to submit a request to Apple to obtain the Location Push Service Extension (com.apple.developer.location.push) entitlement. However, when I checked the Apple Developer Portal now, I don’t see an option to request this entitlement for my App ID. Could you please confirm whether this entitlement is still required to be requested from Apple, or if the process has changed and the request is no longer required? Thanks

We are experiencing an issue when inviting a user to join our Apple Developer Program team through App Store Connect Users and Access. The purpose of adding this user is to include them as an internal TestFlight tester after the invitation is accepted. The invited user received the Apple Developer invitation email and clicked the "Accept invitation" link. The invitation link opens the following page: https://appstoreconnect.apple.com/activation_ds?key=... The page displays "Sign in to accept your invitation" and asks the user to sign in with an Apple Account. After the user signs in successfully, the page redirects back to the same sign-in page and asks the user to sign in again. The invitation cannot be accepted, and the user cannot join the Apple Developer Program team. Steps to reproduce: Go to Users and Access in App Store Connect. Add a new user and send an invitation to join the Apple Developer Program team. The invited user receives the Apple Developer invitation email. The invited user clicks the "Accept invitation" link. The page opens appstoreconnect.apple.com/activation_ds. The user signs in with an Apple Account. After signing in, the page redirects back to the same sign-in page. Repeating the sign-in process results in the same redirect loop. Expected result: The invitation should be accepted after the user signs in, and the user should be added to the Apple Developer Program team. Actual result: The page keeps redirecting back to the sign-in page, and the user cannot accept the invitation. Troubleshooting already tried: Safari and Chrome Private browsing mode Clearing browser cookies Signing out of Apple ID before opening the invitation link again Opening the link directly in the browser instead of an email app embedded browser The issue still occurs.

We're seeing a behavior change with ILMessageFilterExtension on iOS 26 and would like to confirm whether this is expected or a regression. Environment iOS: 26.x Framework: IdentityLookup Extension type: ILMessageFilterExtension Behavior For a new sender: An incoming SMS arrives. handle(_:context:completion:) is invoked. The extension returns a classification. The conversation is moved to the Spam folder. Subsequent SMS messages in the same conversation are delivered to the Spam folder, but handle(_:context:completion:) is no longer invoked for any new messages. Expected behavior We expected the message filter extension to be invoked for every incoming SMS, regardless of the current conversation folder, allowing the extension to evaluate each message independently. Actual behavior Once the conversation is in the Spam folder, all subsequent messages bypass the extension completely. The extension receives no callback, making it impossible to: Re-evaluate new messages using updated filtering logic. Change the classification if sender reputation changes. Apply cloud-based or dynamic filtering policies on subsequent messages. Questions Is this behavior expected in iOS 26? Has the message filtering pipeline changed so that conversations already classified as Spam no longer invoke ILMessageFilterExtension? Is there any documented API or recommended approach to have the extension evaluate every incoming message for an existing Spam conversation? If this is not expected, is this a known issue? If anyone from Apple or other developers can confirm whether this is by design, it would be greatly appreciated.

Hi everyone, I'm developing an iOS app that includes both a Message Filter Extension and a Call Blocking Extension. I'd like to understand whether there is any supported way to collect or access statistics for these extensions, such as: Number of messages filtered (allowed vs. junk) Number of blocked calls Number of identified calls Extension invocation count Filtering success/failure metrics Any analytics or usage data exposed by the system I understand that these extensions are privacy-sensitive, so I'm not expecting access to user content. I'm specifically looking for aggregate statistics or system-provided metrics that an app can legally and technically access. My questions are: Does iOS expose any APIs or callbacks for collecting usage statistics from a Message Filter Extension? Is there any way to determine how many calls were blocked or identified by a Call Blocking Extension? Are there any recommended Apple-supported approaches for tracking extension usage without violating user privacy? If no APIs are available, is this limitation intentional due to the privacy model of these extensions? I'd appreciate any guidance or best practices from Apple engineers or developers who have worked with these extensions. Thank you!

Summary Our Share Extension works correctly on iOS 18 but silently fails on iOS 26. The app appears in the share sheet, the user taps it, the sheet dismisses — and nothing else happens. The containing app never opens. Environment App: com.yourcompany.app Extension: com.yourcompany.app.shareaudio (com.apple.share-services) Source app: Voice Memos Deployment target: iOS 17.0 iOS 18.x (TestFlight): ✅ works — extension runs, app opens, file imports iOS 26.x (same build): ❌ fails — share sheet closes, extension appears to terminate immediately What we've tried Activation rule — NSExtensionActivationRule with UTI-CONFORMS-TO covering com.apple.quicktime-audio, public.audio, public.mpeg-4-audio, com.apple.m4a-audio, public.file-url. Loading the file — tried loadFileRepresentation(forTypeIdentifier:), loadInPlaceFileRepresentation, and loadItem, with fallbacks prioritizing public.file-url and com.apple.quicktime-audio. Logged registeredTypeIdentifiers to confirm what the provider exposes. Opening the containing app — calling extensionContext?.open(url) before completeRequest. Also tested a secondary URL scheme. App Group is configured; we write a pending flag and check it in sceneDidBecomeActive. Voice Memos export modes — tested both Rendered (.m4a) and Editable (.qta). None of this changed the behavior on iOS 26. Specific questions What does NSItemProvider.registeredTypeIdentifiers return on iOS 26 for Voice Memos recordings, especially .qta files? Is com.apple.quicktime-audio still the correct UTI for .qta on iOS 26, or has it changed? Has the recommended API for loading shared audio changed in iOS 26 — loadFileRepresentation, loadInPlaceFileRepresentation, or loadItem? Is NSExtensionContext.open(_:completionHandler:) still the supported way to open the containing app from a Share Extension on iOS 26? Are there new entitlements or restrictions? Is there any WWDC25 session or updated documentation covering Share Extensions receiving Voice Memos exports (including AVFileType.qta)? Is this a known regression in iOS 26? Happy to share logs, a TestFlight build, or a minimal reproducible project if that helps.

Hi everyone, I am working on an iOS application that utilizes a Broadcast Upload Extension (ReplayKit) to perform local, on-device screen analysis. Currently, we are using RPSystemBroadcastPickerView to allow the user to initiate the broadcast session. However, for our specific tracking use case, requiring the user to manually tap the "Start Broadcast" button every time creates a significant friction point in the user experience. My questions are: Is there any private API, entitlement, or MDM (Mobile Device Management) configuration that allows an app to programmatically start a ReplayKit screen recording session completely in the background without explicit human intervention (e.g., without tapping a button in the UI)? If this is strictly prohibited for consumer apps on the App Store due to privacy guidelines, are there any exceptions or enterprise-level profiles available for supervised devices that bypass the mandatory RPSystemBroadcastPickerView user interaction? My understanding is that Apple enforces this manual trigger and the red status bar indicator for strict security and privacy reasons, but I am looking for an official confirmation on whether any programmatic workaround exists for this in modern iOS versions (iOS 15+). Thank you in advance for your time and clarification!

I have created a share extension for my app which supports accepting an image. However the app do not appear in the "Share with App" action of shortcuts. It only shows "Health" and "Reminders" which are default apple apps. What I found though is that if I open some other app like Photos and share an image from it, then go to end of app's list and click more. And in the list if I toggle my app off and on again. And then come back to shourtcuts app, the app then appears. Step 1: Open share sheet, click more Step 2: Toggle the app off and on again and save. And then it switching to shortcuts app, it appear now. I am unable to find a way on how to make this app's share extension support the "Share with app" action of shortcuts by default. This looks like a bug. I did not find any proper documentation as well for this. Can anyone point me to correct way / resource to add my app as supported app here out of the box. Minimal reproducible example: ZIP file of xcode project

I want to use features described in the background assets WWDC22 session (https://developer.apple.com/videos/play/wwdc2022/110403/). In earlier versions of Xcode 14 beta there used to be a background asset extension target type, however this got removed in beta 5 and has still not been put back even though Xcode 14 RC is released. With Xcode 14 beta 4, if the background asset target was chosen then a bunch of template code was created, same as happens with any extension type. But if the background asset extension target type isn't even present in the Xcode 14 RC, how is one supposed to create an extension and use this new feature?

I have an app update that is completely ready for submission. This update incorporates a subscription for new functionality. I'm unable to submit as the subscription is stuck in the "Prepare for submission" state instead of going to "Ready to submit" and I'm unable to include it with my app. After doing some research, I found that the banking information on my developer account is broken. I tried to update and fix this information. However, I get an error saying that it is unable to find "Bank of America". I suspect this is causing everything else to be stuck in the "Prepare for submission" state. Does anyone know how to work around this issue or can someone at Apple give me an ETA as to when things will be fixed. This issue is delaying my release. - Ken

I have been implementing a share extension for my app and have added the activation rule NSExtensionActivationSupportsImageWithMaxCount. While testing I've noticed that my app will appear in the Share Sheet as a viable target when the max count is exceeded by up to 2 additional photos. For example if I set max to 4 then my app will appear in the share sheet when the user is sharing 1-6 images. On its own this wouldn't be too problematic, I figured I could put some validation in the extension that specifies the user has exceeded the allowed number. But while debugging the extension under this scenario I noticed that the inputItems array on the NSExtensionContext will only contain the number of items I've defined as the max, and silently drop the extra items. I'm sure users will see this as a bug with my app "losing" the extra images since the OS/Share Sheet provides my app as a valid target. My entire Info.plist <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <!DOCTYPE plist PUBLIC "-//Apple//DTD PLIST 1.0//EN" "http://www.apple.com/DTDs/PropertyList-1.0.dtd"> <plist version="1.0"> <dict> <key>NSExtensionAttributes</key> <dict> <key>NSExtensionActivationRule</key> <dict> <key>NSExtensionActivationSupportsWebURLWithMaxCount</key> <integer>1</integer> <key>NSExtensionActivationSupportsImageWithMaxCount</key> <integer>4</integer> </dict> </dict> <key>NSExtensionPointIdentifier</key> <string>com.apple.share-services</string> <key>NSExtensionPrincipalClass</key> <string>$(PRODUCT_MODULE_NAME).ShareViewController</string> </dict> </plist> Entire code implementation of the extension class ShareViewController: UIViewController { override func viewDidLoad() { super.viewDidLoad() if let extensionContext { debugPrint(extensionContext) } } } Edit: I've been testing on iOS 26.5 with a minimum deployment of iOS 26.0

Hi everyone, First, I'd like to say that I'm really excited about the direction FSKit is taking. Having a modern, user-space filesystem framework on macOS is a huge improvement, and I'm currently working on porting an existing cross-platform FUSE-based filesystem to use it. One challenge I've run into is automated testing. Our project has Linux, Windows, and macOS CI. On Linux, we can perform real mount/unmount integration tests on every commit. On Windows, we can do the same using WinFsp. However, on GitHub-hosted macOS runners, it appears that filesystem extensions still require interactive approval or registration before they can be mounted. This makes it difficult to validate the actual mount lifecycle in ephemeral CI environments. We can still compile and unit test our filesystem logic, but we can't exercise the final "mount a filesystem and verify it behaves correctly" integration tests without a self-hosted Mac. I'm curious whether this is the expected long-term workflow, or whether Apple has plans to make this easier for developers. Some questions I have are: Is unattended registration of an FSKit filesystem extension in CI something that's being considered? Are there plans to support ephemeral CI environments such as GitHub Actions without requiring manual interaction? Is there a recommended approach for automated integration testing of FSKit filesystems today that I'm overlooking? More generally, what does Apple envision as the best practice for projects that want to continuously test real filesystem mounts? I completely understand the security motivations for requiring user approval on end-user systems. My question is specifically about trusted development and CI environments where the machine is temporary and exists solely for automated testing. Thanks for any guidance, and thanks to the FSKit team for the work that's gone into making user-space filesystems a first-class experience on macOS.

I am writing a share extension for my app so users can share images from other apps. I have added the NSExtensionActivationSupportsImageWithMaxCount key to the NSExtensionActivationRule dictionary but I am wondering if there is a way to define the activation rule to say I will accept any number of images, and not have it constrained by a maximum value. Looking at the documentation I've noticed that attachments seem to be the only option that defines a minimum count (NSExtensionActivationSupportsAttachmentsWithMinCount). Is there an undocumented equivalent for images or some particular combination to use? I know I could set the max to be some very high number like 999, but I'm just wondering if there is an "official" supported way to achieve a min count defined on the extensions rules.

In the WWDC19 session "Embedding and Sharing Visually Rich Links" it mentions how the Messages app is able to gain access to the LPLinkMetadata provided to the Share Sheet (direct time link) so that it does not have to load the metadata itself. Looking through the NSExtensionContext's inputItems in my share extension and I could not see anything obvious that would allow my own share extension to read the loaded metadata. Am I missing something or is the metadata not made available? To be clear, I am aware of how to use LPMetadataProvider to fetch the metadata. I just want to know if my share extension can make use of the metadata that the Share Sheet has already loaded.

Somewhere since iOS 26, the LockedCameraCapture framework gets in an unpredictable state after opening the main app from the LockedCamera extension using LockedCameraCaptureSession.openApplication(for userActivity:). (Feedback with sample code to reproduce: FB21966835) Opening the extension from the lock screen again doesn’t open the extension but puts the lock screen in a state as if it has. Content updated from LockedCameraCaptureManager.shared.sessionContentUpdates comes in inconsistently, usually needs the app to be opened again or the extension to be opened. This makes using this extension impossible for me as I use it to record video files that manually need to be imported when the app is launched (so not through PhotoKit). Does anybody have a suggestion to circumvent this issue or how to get this fixed?

Hello, I am developing a Safari extension that uses service workers and all works well. When the extension is updated, a new content script is injected into the current open tabs however the service worker connection with the new content script does not get established. I confirmed both the old content script and new one is on the page, but the new one just doesn't execute which means it will not connect to the service worker. In Chrome a newly injected content script does work and in FireFox it is handled by FireFox automatically. How can this be done in Safari? Any help would be appreciated.

These days, we live our lives completely surrounded by and immersed in smartphones. It seems there isn't a single person among us who isn't. This is because we can find all kinds of information, meet friends, and enjoy our leisure time on our smartphones. However, there is one thing we are overlooking. It is the emotion you will feel toward the people around you as you die on the day you come to pass away. What is that emotion? It is regret. That regret is likely the longing to enjoy physical intimacy, conversation, travel, and everyday life more. That is why I am developing an app with a special feature. I am developing an app that helps users self-regulate and maintain moderation in their smartphone usage—something we are addicted to and love so much, yet often fail to realize that it is poison. This app is designed to encourage mutual moderation and provide rewards. Ironically, this app is designed to operate on the smartphone itself. The reason is that if the smartphone is a tiger's den, then to catch the tiger, one must enter the tiger's den. While conceptualizing and proceeding with development, I encountered a completely insurmountable wall. This is because the iPhone cannot accurately measure the screen-off time. I earnestly hope that if there is a team or developer working on the iPhone framework, you can resolve this issue. If you can extend the extension or take measures to allow access to that data within the SDK, I believe I will be able to complete this app. I look forward to your help.

Hi all, I'm building an iOS app extension using ExtensionKit that works exclusively with its containing host app, presenting UI via EXHostViewController. I'd like the extension to have read-only access to the host's task for process introspection purposes. I'm aware this would almost certainly require a special entitlement. I know get-task-allow and the debugger entitlement exist, but those aren't shippable to the App Store. I'm looking for something that could realistically be distributed to end users. My questions: Does an entitlement exist (or is one planned) that would grant an extension limited, read-only access to its host's task—given the extension is already tightly coupled to the host? If not, is this something Apple would consider adding? The use case is an extension that needs to inspect host process state without the ability to modify it. Is there a path to request such an entitlement through the provisioning profile process, or is this fundamentally off the table for App Store distribution? It seems like a reasonable trust boundary given the extension already lives inside the host's app bundle, but I understand the security implications. Any insight appreciated. Thanks!

I'm building a Wi-Fi captive portal (web page) that needs the camera to scan a boarding-pass barcode. Inside the iOS Captive Network Assistant (the sign-in pop-up that appears when you join Wi-Fi): getUserMedia() (live camera) doesn't work, and <input type="file" capture="environment"> opens only the photo library, not the camera. The same page works fine in full Safari on the same iPhone. Is camera access intentionally blocked in the CNA, or is there a supported way to use it? Has anyone gotten the camera working inside the captive portal on iOS? Thanks!

Hi, I'm trying to test out an extension I'm building in Xcode and every time I try to test it, Safari crashes immediately. On later versions of Mac OS, e.g. Sequoia, there's no problem. I'm building this extension as part of a Mac Catalyst app that is a hybrid iPad/Mac OS app. On Safari 26.3 (20623.2.7.18.1) I can just add the source tree as a temporary extension and it works fine. But the .appex file for the same thing is causing the older Safari 17.6 (17618.3.11.11.7, 17618) to throw a fit. Trying to get through this with LLMs has focused on whether the extension target is for iOS and Mac OS or just Mac OS alone, and futzing with UIDeviceFamily the Build Settings. But basically it just doesn't work no matter what I do, and Safari shouldn't crash. Here's the .appex's Info.plist after compilation: % defaults read /Users/[username]/Library/Developer/Xcode/DerivedData/PlainSite-[gibberish]/Build/Products/Debug-maccatalyst/PlainSite.app/Contents/PlugIns/PlainSiteRecycler.appex/Contents/Info.plist { BuildMachineOSBuild = 21H1320; CFBundleIdentifier = "com.thinkcomputer.[product].[extension]"; CFBundleShortVersionString = "1.0"; CFBundleSupportedPlatforms = ( MacOSX ); CFBundleVersion = 2; DTCompiler = "com.apple.compilers.llvm.clang.1_0"; DTPlatformBuild = 14C18; DTPlatformName = macosx; DTPlatformVersion = "13.1"; DTSDKBuild = 22C55; DTSDKName = "macosx13.1"; DTXcode = 1420; DTXcodeBuild = 14C18; LSMinimumSystemVersion = "12.0"; NSExtension = { NSExtensionAttributes = { SafariWebExtensionPath = src; }; NSExtensionPointIdentifier = "com.apple.Safari.web-extension"; NSExtensionPrincipalClass = "PlainSiteRecycler.SafariWebExtensionHandler"; }; UIDeviceFamily = ( 2, 6 ); } Crash log: Hardware Model: MacBookPro12,1 Process: Safari [44241] Path: /Applications/Safari.app/Contents/MacOS/Safari Identifier: com.apple.Safari Version: 17.6 (17618.3.11.11.7) Code Type: X86-64 (Native) Role: Background Parent Process: launchd [1] Coalition: com.apple.Safari [1098] Date/Time: 2026-06-12 13:29:10.8546 -0700 Launch Time: 2026-06-12 13:27:27.7047 -0700 OS Version: macOS 12.7.6 (21H1320) Release Type: User Report Version: 104 Exception Type: EXC_BAD_ACCESS (SIGSEGV) Exception Subtype: KERN_PROTECTION_FAILURE at 0x00007ff7b77d1ff8 Exception Codes: 0x0000000000000002, 0x00007ff7b77d1ff8 VM Region Info: 0x7ff7b77d1ff8 is in 0x7ff7b3fd2000-0x7ff7b77d2000; bytes after start: 58720248 bytes before end: 7 REGION TYPE START - END [ VSIZE] PRT/MAX SHRMOD REGION DETAIL MALLOC_SMALL 7fa313000000-7fa313800000 [ 8192K] rw-/rwx SM=PRV GAP OF 0x54a07d2000 BYTES ---> STACK GUARD 7ff7b3fd2000-7ff7b77d2000 [ 56.0M] ---/rwx SM=NUL ... for thread 0 Stack 7ff7b77d2000-7ff7b7fd2000 [ 8192K] rw-/rwx SM=PRV thread 0 Exception Note: EXC_CORPSE_NOTIFY Termination Reason: SIGNAL 11 Segmentation fault: 11 Terminating Process: exc handler [44241] Highlighted by Thread: 0 Backtrace not available No thread state (register information) available Binary Images: 0x0 - 0xffffffffffffffff ??? (*) <00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000> ??? Error Formulating Crash Report: dyld_process_info_create failed with 5 Failed to create CSSymbolicatorRef - corpse still valid ¯_(ツ)/¯ thread_get_state(PAGEIN) returned 0x10000003: (ipc/send) invalid destination port thread_get_state(EXCEPTION) returned 0x10000003: (ipc/send) invalid destination port thread_get_state(FLAVOR) returned 0x10000003: (ipc/send) invalid destination port EOF Full Report {"app_name":"Safari","timestamp":"2026-06-12 13:29:12.00 -0700","app_version":"17.6","slice_uuid":"af2262af-647d-3262-adc8-e52c3ef7579e","build_version":"17618.3.11.11.7","platform":0,"bundleID":"com.apple.Safari","share_with_app_devs":0,"is_first_party":0,"bug_type":"309","os_version":"macOS 12.7.6 (21H1320)","incident_id":"8F871759-8566-49DE-A6F9-EE73128BB836","name":"Safari"} { "uptime" : 100000, "procLaunch" : "2026-06-12 13:27:27.7047 -0700", "procRole" : "Background", "version" : 2, "userID" : 503, "deployVersion" : 210, "modelCode" : "MacBookPro12,1", "procStartAbsTime" : 102649791496150, "coalitionID" : 1098, "osVersion" : { "train" : "macOS 12.7.6", "build" : "21H1320", "releaseType" : "User" }, "captureTime" : "2026-06-12 13:29:10.8546 -0700", "incident" : "8F871759-8566-49DE-A6F9-EE73128BB836", "bug_type" : "309", "pid" : 44241, "procExitAbsTime" : 102752878214260, "cpuType" : "X86-64", "procName" : "Safari", "procPath" : "/Applications/Safari.app/Contents/MacOS/Safari", "bundleInfo" : {"CFBundleShortVersionString":"17.6","CFBundleVersion":"17618.3.11.11.7","CFBundleIdentifier":"com.apple.Safari"}, "buildInfo" : {"ProjectName":"Safari","SourceVersion":"7618003011011007","ProductBuildVersion":"618G22","BuildVersion":"12"}, "storeInfo" : {"deviceIdentifierForVendor":"28124F28-A4EB-556C-A50C-D710162ABDA6","thirdParty":true}, "parentProc" : "launchd", "parentPid" : 1, "coalitionName" : "com.apple.Safari", "crashReporterKey" : "134BE33B-9612-8725-73E0-95998174507F", "wakeTime" : 67008, "sleepWakeUUID" : "F942DC6A-04DF-4EE2-AA9F-DB3EDCB24AC3", "sip" : "enabled", "isCorpse" : 1, "exception" : {"codes":"0x0000000000000002, 0x00007ff7b77d1ff8","rawCodes":[2,140701912080376],"type":"EXC_BAD_ACCESS","signal":"SIGSEGV","subtype":"KERN_PROTECTION_FAILURE at 0x00007ff7b77d1ff8"}, "termination" : {"flags":0,"code":11,"namespace":"SIGNAL","indicator":"Segmentation fault: 11","byProc":"exc handler","byPid":44241}, "usedImages" : [ { "size" : 0, "source" : "A", "base" : 0, "uuid" : "00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" } ], "sharedCache" : { "base" : 140703277129728, "size" : 19331678208, "uuid" : "246818c3-4b9f-3462-bcaf-fdf71975e5fe" }, "legacyInfo" : { "threadHighlighted" : 0 }, "trialInfo" : { "rollouts" : [ { "rolloutId" : "61301e3a61217b3110231469", "factorPackIds" : { "SIRI_FIND_MY_CONFIGURATION_FILES" : "652886aa2c02f032beae8316" }, "deploymentId" : 240000028 }, { "rolloutId" : "5ffde50ce2aacd000d47a95f", "factorPackIds" : { }, "deploymentId" : 240000550 } ], "experiments" : [ ] }, "reportNotes" : [ "dyld_process_info_create failed with 5", "Failed to create CSSymbolicatorRef - corpse still valid ¯\(ツ)_/¯", "thread_get_state(PAGEIN) returned 0x10000003: (ipc/send) invalid destination port", "thread_get_state(EXCEPTION) returned 0x10000003: (ipc/send) invalid destination port", "thread_get_state(FLAVOR) returned 0x10000003: (ipc/send) invalid destination port" ] } Any help would be greatly appreciated!