Overview

Hello Apple Developer Support, My app has been stuck in “Waiting for Review” since February 7, and I have submitted multiple inquiries without receiving any response. This delay has now become extremely concerning. Missing a planned launch due to an indefinite review timeline is very difficult for independent developers. If there is an issue with the submission, I would appreciate clear communication. If there are review delays, transparency would help us plan accordingly. I respect the review process, but the lack of updates after this amount of time is frustrating. I would sincerely appreciate clarification on the status. I kindly ask for a specific and personalized response regarding my case, as my previous inquiries received only general or automated replies without addressing the actual issue. Thank you.

As part of the OpenJDK testing we run several regression tests, including for Java SE networking APIs. These APIs ultimately end up calling BSD socket functions. On macos, starting macos 26, including on recent 26.2 version, we have started seeing some unexplained but consistent exception from one of these BSD socket APIs. We receive a "ENOBUFS" errno (No buffer space available) when trying to construct a socket(). These exact same tests continue to pass on many other older versions of macos (including 15.7.x). After looking into this more, we have been able to narrow this down to a very trivial C code which is as follows (also attached): #include <stdio.h> #include <sys/socket.h> #include <string.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <sys/errno.h> static int create_socket(const int attempt_number) { const int fd = socket(AF_INET6, SOCK_STREAM, 0); if (fd < 0) { fprintf(stderr, "socket creation failed on attempt %d," " due to: %s\n", attempt_number, strerror(errno)); return fd; } return fd; } int main() { const unsigned int num_times = 250000; for (unsigned int i = 1; i <= num_times; i++) { const int fd = create_socket(i); if (fd < 0) { return -1; } close(fd); } fprintf(stderr, "successfully created and closed %d sockets\n", num_times); } The code very trivially creates a socket() and close()s it. It does this repeatedly in a loop for a certain number of iterations. Compiling this as: clang sockbufspaceerr.c -o sockbufspaceerr.o and running it as: ./sockbufspaceerr.o consistently generates an error as follows on macos 26.x: socket creation failed on attempt 160995, due to: No buffer space available The iteration number on which the socket() creation fails varies, but the issue does reproduce. Running the same on older versions of macos doesn't reproduce the issue and the program terminates normally after those many iterations. Looking at the xnu source that is made available for each macos release here https://opensource.apple.com/releases/, I see that for macos 26.x there have been changes in this kernel code and there appears to be some kind of memory accountability code introduced in this code path. However, looking at the reproducer/application code in question, I believe it uses the right set of functions to both create as well as release the resources, so I can't see why this should cause the above error in macos 26.x. Does this look like some issue that needs attention in the macos kernel and should I report it through feedback assitant tool?

We have been having unexplained failures with the codesign tool recently on macosx aarch64 and x64 hosts. Every once in a while when signing an app locally using the following command: /usr/bin/codesign -s - -vvvv --force /home/me/FooBarCalculator.app results in the following error: /home/me/FooBarCalculator.app: timestamps differ by 185 seconds - check your system clock The number of seconds reported in the error message keeps varying (but usually in that range). We have checked the system clock but there isn't anything wrong (from what we can see) with the host. In fact, we have been seeing this error on several hosts now, so it isn't specific to one host. While looking into this issue, we even printed the details of an already signed binary using the following command: codesign -dvvv HelloWorld.app and that prints among other things, similar warning message: ... Timestamp=12 May 2026 at 5:36:0 AM HelloWorld.app: timestamp mismatch: internal time 12 May 2026 at 5:32:59 AM (184 seconds apart) I'm looking for inputs on how we go about debugging this issue and where/how the codesign tool sources these timestamps from (any specific API?) and what value is it comparing against to notice a difference. These affected hosts have different operating system versions some 15.x and some 26.x.

The epic saga of registering an Apple Developer Account for my company seems to have been successfully resolved. The full story can be read here My account has been approved, I've paid the membership fee, and everything appears to be in order. Huge thanks to everyone, especially the Apple staff members who didn't stay indifferent and went out of their way to help. Current status: My developer account is active. I can sign in to https://developer.apple.com/account and see that everything looks fine - there are no pending actions on my side (no agreements to sign, etc.), and the account appears completely normal. However, when I try to sign in to App Store Connect, I get the following error: To access App Store Connect, you must be an individual or team member in the Apple Developer Program, or invited by an individual to access their content in App Store Connect. (https://appstoreconnect.apple.com/login?errorKey=ITC.signin.error.invalidUser.asc) I'm attaching a screenshot. What I've already tried: Clearing browser cache, trying different browsers and devices, and waiting for some time — none of this helped. On May 9, I submitted a support request (Case ID: 20000112974233), but I still haven't received a response. My guess is that my account may have exhausted its Apple Developer Support request limit, since during the original issue I sent dozens of messages and may have used up my quota. This is just a hypothesis, but if I'm right, I would be very grateful if my ability to receive Apple Developer Support could be restored. Thank you in advance. For reference: similar case: I also did some research and found that another forum user had the same issue, which was resolved through Apple Developer Support (hopefully this helps point in the right direction): https://discussions.apple.com/thread/255265181 Thanks in advance for any help!

model : iphone 17 ios version: 26.2 app used: https://developer.apple.com/documentation/wifiaware/building-peer-to-peer-apps Here is our observation when we tried to make wifi aware connection between iphone and our wifi device. note : we used iphone as subscriber ( view simulation) 1.pairing & bootstrapping was successfully done 2.Data path was successfully established between iphone and our device. after data path establishment ,within few seconds , DATA PATH TERMINATION was sent from iphone which leads to pairing verification with new NMI address. Same behaviour is noticed even when we try to establish connection between two iphone devices. Here we have few questions. Once we establish data path , Why iphone initiates data path termination instead using the same service for data path exchange. 2.Why do we go for PAIRING VERIFICATION everytime.

I'm keeping most information in an actor and I would like to save also a closure in it that I get from func application( _ application: UIApplication, handleEventsForBackgroundURLSession identifier: String, completionHandler: @escaping () -> Void) Task.init{ await GeoreferenceQueue.shared.setBackgroundCompletionHandler(completionHandler) } } where GeoreferenceQueue is and actor, while the caller is a class. yet I receive error: Passing closure as a 'sending' parameter risks causing data races between code in the current task and concurrent execution of the closure and Sending task-isolated 'completionHandler' to actor-isolated instance method 'setBackgroundCompletionHandler' risks causing data races between actor-isolated and task-isolated uses

Hi everyone, We are the engineering team behind an enterprise communications application for macOS. We are experiencing a critical crash on macOS 26 that did not occur on any previous macOS version. We are seeking clarification from Apple engineers or anyone who may have insight into this behaviour. Environment Architecturex86_64macOS26.4.1 (25E253)HardwareMac15,13 (MacBook Pro)ExceptionSIGILL / ILL_ILLOPCCrashed ThreadThread 0 (Main Thread)TriggerPlaying a notification sound via NSSound during an incoming call Crash Stack 0 caulk consolidating_free_map::maybe_create_free_node + 119 ← SIGILL 1 caulk tiered_allocator + 1469 2 caulk exported_resource::do_allocate + 15 3 AudioToolboxCore EABLImpl::create + 204 4 CoreAudio AUNotQuiteSoSimpleTimeFactory + 33267 8 AudioToolboxCore AudioUnitInitialize + 189 9 AudioToolbox XAudioUnit::Initialize + 19 10 AudioToolbox MESubmixGraph::initialize + 125 11 AudioToolbox MESubmixGraph::connectInputChannel + 1172 12 AudioToolbox MEDeviceStreamClient::AddRunningClient + 509 15 AudioToolbox AudioQueueObject::StartRunning + 194 16 AudioToolbox AudioQueueObject::Start + 1447 22 AudioToolbox AQ::API::V2Impl::AudioQueueStartWithFlags + 805 23 AVFAudio AVAudioPlayerCpp::playQueue + 354 24 AVFAudio AVAudioPlayerCpp::DoAction + 134 25 AVFAudio -[AVAudioPlayer play] + 26 26 AppKit -[NSSound play] + 100 27 Our App -[AudioHelper tryToStartSound:ofType:] + 569 28 Our App block_invoke + 59 Behaviour Difference Between macOS Versions The exact same code path that triggers this crash on macOS 26 works without any issue on macOS 14 and macOS 15 — no crash, no warning, no log output of any kind. The crash occurs inside Apple's private caulk memory allocator during CoreAudio audio engine initialisation, triggered by a call to [NSSound play]. The SIGILL / ILL_ILLOPC at maybe_create_free_node + 119 suggests a hard ud2 trap — an intentional abort guard inserted at compile time. This strongly suggests that something changed in macOS 26 within NSSound / CoreAudio / caulk that causes this code path to fail in a way it previously did not. Questions We have the following specific questions: Was there a deliberate threading policy change in NSSound / CoreAudio in macOS 26? Is the SIGILL in caulk::consolidating_free_map::maybe_create_free_node an intentional thread-affinity assertion introduced in macOS 26? Are there any other NSSound / AVAudioPlayer / AudioQueue APIs that have similarly tightened their requirements in macOS 26 that we should be aware of? Is there a migration guide, release note, or WWDC session that covers CoreAudio changes in macOS 26 that we may have missed? Has anyone else in the developer community encountered a similar SIGILL crash in caulk on macOS 26 during audio playback?

I’m encountering a persistent issue with my Network Extension (specifically NEFilterDataProvider) and would really appreciate any insights. The extension generally works as expected, but after some time — especially after sleep/wake cycles or network changes — a global network outage occurs. During this state, no network traffic works: pings fail, browsers can’t load pages, etc. As soon as I stop the extension (by disabling it in System Preferences), the network immediately recovers. If I re-enable it, the outage returns instantly. I’ve also noticed that once this happens, the extension stops receiving callbacks like handleNewFlow(), and reinstalling the app or restarting the extension doesn’t help. The only thing that resolves the issue is rebooting the system. After reboot, the extension works fine again — until the problem reoccurs later. I asked AI about this behavior, and it suggested the possibility that the kernel might have marked the extension as untrusted, causing the system to intentionally block all network traffic as a safety mechanism. Has anyone experienced similar behavior with NEFilterDataProvider? Could there be a way to detect or prevent this state without rebooting? Is there any logging or diagnostic data I should collect when it happens again? Any guidance or pointers would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance!

Dear Apple Developer Support Team, I would like to inquire whether there is a stable and official method to obtain the correct Team ID. When my app attempts to store data in the Keychain on a physical device, the retrieved Team ID is an unknown one and does not match the Team ID of my developer certificate. This issue consistently results in Keychain access failure with error code -34018. Could you please advise the root cause and provide a reliable solution to fix this Team ID mismatch and resolve the -34018 Keychain error? NSDictionary *query = [NSDictionary dictionaryWithObjectsAndKeys: kSecClassGenericPassword, kSecClass, @"bundleSeedID", kSecAttrAccount, @"", kSecAttrService, (id)kCFBooleanTrue, kSecReturnAttributes, nil]; CFDictionaryRef result = nil; OSStatus status = SecItemCopyMatching((CFDictionaryRef)query, (CFTypeRef *)&result); if (status == errSecItemNotFound) status = SecItemAdd((CFDictionaryRef)query, (CFTypeRef *)&result); if (status != errSecSuccess) return nil; NSString *accessGroup = [(__bridge NSDictionary *)result objectForKey:kSecAttrAccessGroup]; NSArray *components = [accessGroup componentsSeparatedByString:@"."]; NSString *bundleSeedID = [[components objectEnumerator] nextObject]; CFRelease(result); return bundleSeedID;

Hi Im creating an app with Alarmkit, the idea is to have the hardware buttons react like they do in Alarmclock with a snooze or if the buttons can just mute without intent. right now, hardware button end and dismisses the Alarm. its instinct to click that button. apple needs to update or do something.

Hi everyone, I'm developing an iOS app using Swift (Foundation, Network, and Combine) that communicates via TCP with a weighing scale. The scale uses an internal ESP32 module acting as a Wi-Fi Access Point (no internet access) specifically for data transmission. The app connects to this network and opens a socket to receive weight data and send command strings. I’m currently facing two main issues: Socket Management: The socket isn't closing properly. Occasionally, the app opens multiple simultaneous connections instead of maintaining a single one. Since the ESP32 has a client limit, these ghost connections eventually hang the communication module. Invalid Outbound Data: The connection drops frequently because the scale receives invalid strings from the app. My logs show strange character sequences (like "gggggggggfdhj" or "vfgdddddddddddtty") being sent involuntarily. I haven't programmed these strings, and they cause the scale to terminate the session due to protocol violations. How can I ensure proper socket closure and prevent these random data packets? Additionally, a technical question: Is it possible to keep this TCP connection active in the background indefinitely on iOS while the user interacts with other apps?

Hi DTS, I have 4 notarytool submissions all stuck in "In Progress" with no movement for 12+ hours. 'xcrun notarytool log <id›' returns "Submission log is not yet available" for all of them - they don't appear to have been processed at all. Team Identifier: NS22D2XK8A 1 .dmg submission at 2026-05-12T01:35Z (12+ hours stuck) dmg submissions between 10:04Z and 12:12Z This is my first time notarizing with this Team ID - possibly the new-account first-submission "in-depth analysis" delay? The DMG passes every standard check: Signed with Developer ID Application (Team NS22D2XK8A) Hardened runtime on all 6 embedded binaries (codesign flags 0x10000) Full authority chain: Developer ID App → Developer ID CA → Apple Root CA Secure timestamp present Entitlements: allow-jit, allow-unsigned-executable-memory, disable-library-validation, network.client, network.server, files.user-selected. read-write codesign --verify -deep --strict passes cleanly spctl source = "Developer ID Application" (correct) DMG itself signed inside-out per TN2206 I have read the other recent "stuck In Progress" threads from new Developer IDs - same pattern. Could the queue be unblocked, or is there a team-side configuration that needs flipping? Happy to provide submission UUIDs + filenames privately via Feedback Assistant or DM. Thanks!

For a couple of months now I haven't been able to see new crash reports for my App Store apps in Xcode. I see the list of crash reports in the Organizer, but selecting any of the new ones always shows the same error message: Error Downloading Crash Log Information: An error occurred preventing Xcode from downloading crash log information. "my.email at domain.com" failed with error: There was a failure decoding response: (HTTP 500, 20364 bytes) The data couldn't be read because it isn't in the correct format.. Pushing the Reload button makes the view load for a bit, but then the same error appears again. Since I want to keep fixing crashes in my apps as fast as possible, is Apple aware of the issue and working on a fix? I don't know if this is a Xcode or App Store Connect issue. I would have expected this issue to be fixed with the newest Xcode version 26.5, but it's still happening. I opened FB22589345 on April 23, but got no response so far.

Hello, I would like to have MSAL login fully working in a Developer ID signed macOS application. I am using the following library for adding MSAL support to my macOS app : https://github.com/AzureAD/microsoft-authentication-library-for-objc . The MSAL login (even silent login via the MSAL broker) works fully via my company Entra ID when I run and test my local dev build. But : when I build and sign and notarize my application with a company Developer ID signature, the login fails, and I see keychain access related issues in the MSAL library log entries. The MSAL library requires the following keychain access groups to be enabled : $(AppIdentifierPrefix)com.company.app.bundle.id $(AppIdentifierPrefix)com.microsoft.identity.universalstorage The above requirement is confirmed under these links: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/entra/msal/objc/howto-v2-keychain-objc?tabs=objc and also their sample app : https://github.com/AzureAD/microsoft-authentication-library-for-objc/blob/410256714ee0489d212c0cbd8772259a69e7d862/MSAL/test/app/mac/MSALMacTestApp.entitlements#L18 The problem seems to be that such keychain access groups access cannot be configured for Developer ID signed applications. Would it be possible to enable such Keychain Access groups somehow for a Developer ID signed application? Thank you for any help in advance!

I’m seeing a regression in Xcode 26.4 where Interface Builder will not allow connecting IBOutlets or IBActions. Symptoms: The usual gutter circle/dot does not appear next to IBOutlet / IBAction in the code editor Because of this, I cannot: drag from storyboard → code drag from code → storyboard The class is valid and already connected to the storyboard (existing outlets work) Assistant Editor opens the correct view controller file Important: The exact same project, unchanged, works perfectly in Xcode 26.3. I can create and connect outlets/actions normally there. ⸻ Environment Xcode: 26.4 macOS: 26.4 Mac Mini M4 Pro 64G Ram Project: Objective-C UIKit app using Storyboards This is a long-running, ObjC, project (not newly created) ⸻ What I’ve already tried To rule out the usual suspects: Verified View Controller Custom Class is correctly set in Identity Inspector Verified files are in the correct Target Membership Verified outlets are declared correctly in the .h file: @property (weak, nonatomic) IBOutlet UILabel *exampleLabel; Opened correct file manually (not relying on Automatic Assistant) Tried both: storyboard → code drag code → storyboard drag Tried using Connections Inspector Clean Build Folder Deleted entire DerivedData Restarted Xcode Updated macOS to 26.4 Ran: sudo xcodebuild -runFirstLaunch Confirmed required platform components installed Reopened project fresh ⸻ Observations In Xcode 26.4 the outlet “connection circles” are completely missing In Xcode 26.3 they appear immediately for the same code Existing connections still function at runtime — this is purely an Interface Builder issue ⸻ Question The gutter circles appearance has always been flaky in Xcode over the 13+ years I've been using it but now with 26.4 they have completely disappeared. Has anyone else seen this in Xcode 26.4, or found a workaround? At this point it looks like a regression in Interface Builder, but I haven’t found any mention of it yet.

I have a app that has both mobile and watch versions. Recently some testers report that the watch app could not be launched if the put the app in the background and then resume. And if they kill the app and try to launch again, there is no any response when tapping the app icon. I managed to export some system logs by installing a sysdiagnose profile, and this info looks suspicious

Hello, We are currently in the process of creating our Developer ID Application certificate which is due to expire. While creating the certificate, we were posed with the option of choosing a Developer ID Certificate Intermediary G2 Sub CA which is supported by Xcode 11.4.1 and later Previous Sub CA We currently build our application out of Xcode using Make or CMake files and perform the codesign and productsign using the codesign commands. We also use 2 different build machines, Ventura with Xcode 14.3 for our latest releases High Sierra (10.13) with Xcode 10.1 for legacy releases to support some customers. Can you please let us know which Developer ID Certificate Intermediary we should choose for generating the new Developer ID Application certificate?

FB: https://feedbackassistant.apple.com/feedback/22556883 We're seeing a small number of production users where both Transaction.currentEntitlements and Transaction.all return zero transactions for a valid, active, non-refunded non-consumable IAP. This makes it impossible to restore the purchase via any StoreKit 2 API. Environment: Xcode 26.4 (Build 17E192) iOS 26.4.1 Direct call to SK2 Transactions.all & Flutter in_app_purchase package v3.2.3 (uses SK2 on iOS 15+) Non-consumable IAP (one-time purchase) What we observe: AppStore.sync() triggers but the purchase stream returns 0 transactions Transaction.all returns empty Transaction.currentEntitlements also returns empty User is confirmed on the correct Apple ID Issue reproduces on both iPhone and Mac for the same Apple ID Issue appears to have started recently for users who previously had no problems Debug log from affected production user: [2026-04-20T08:50:10.744115Z] init: iapAvailable=true [2026-04-20T08:50:10.744566Z] init: isPremium=false [2026-04-20T08:50:10.744567Z] init: triggering silent restorePurchases [2026-04-20T08:50:45.974566Z] restore: started [2026-04-20T08:50:45.986848Z] restore: sk2Transactions count=0 [2026-04-20T08:50:45.993004Z] restore: sk2Direct isVerified=false active=null [2026-04-20T08:50:45.993011Z] restore: sk2Direct inconclusive — falling back to standard restore [2026-04-20T08:51:16.000851Z] restore: timed out after 30s — fallback isPremium=false [2026-04-20T08:51:16.000910Z] restore: completed — succeeded=false foundPurchase=false Unable to reproduce in sandbox — Transaction.all works correctly there. Appears specific to production for a small subset of users. Has anyone else seen this?

We have a VPN app that uses NEPacketTunnelProvider with includeAllNetworks = true. We've encountered an issue where push notifications are not delivered over Wi-Fi while the tunnel is active in a pre-MFA quarantine state (tunnel is up but traffic is blocked on server side), regardless of whether excludeAPNS is set to true or false. Observed behavior Wi-Fi excludeAPNS = true - Notifications not delivered Wi-Fi excludeAPNS = false - Notifications not delivered Cellular excludeAPNS = true - Notifications delivered Cellular excludeAPNS = false - Notifications not delivered On cellular, the behavior matches our expectations: setting excludeAPNS = true allows APNS traffic to bypass the tunnel and notifications arrive; setting it to false routes APNS through the tunnel and notifications are blocked (as expected for a non-forwarding tunnel). On Wi-Fi, notifications fail to deliver in both cases. Our question Is this expected behavior when includeAllNetworks is enabled on Wi-Fi, or is this a known issue / bug with APNS delivery? Is there something else in the Wi-Fi networking path that includeAllNetworks affects beyond routing, which could prevent APNS from functioning even when the traffic is excluded from the tunnel? Sample Project Below is the minimal code that reproduces this issue. The project has two targets: a main app and a Network Extension. The tunnel provider captures all IPv4 and IPv6 traffic via default routes but does not forward packets — simulating a pre-MFA quarantine state. The main app configures the tunnel with includeAllNetworks = true and provides a UI toggle for excludeAPNS. PacketTunnelProvider.swift (Network Extension target): import NetworkExtension class PacketTunnelProvider: NEPacketTunnelProvider { override func startTunnel(options: [String : NSObject]?, completionHandler: @escaping (Error?) -> Void) { let settings = NEPacketTunnelNetworkSettings(tunnelRemoteAddress: "127.0.0.1") let ipv4 = NEIPv4Settings(addresses: ["198.51.100.1"], subnetMasks: ["255.255.255.0"]) ipv4.includedRoutes = [NEIPv4Route.default()] settings.ipv4Settings = ipv4 let ipv6 = NEIPv6Settings(addresses: ["fd00::1"], networkPrefixLengths: [64]) ipv6.includedRoutes = [NEIPv6Route.default()] settings.ipv6Settings = ipv6 let dns = NEDNSSettings(servers: ["198.51.100.1"]) settings.dnsSettings = dns settings.mtu = 1400 setTunnelNetworkSettings(settings) { error in if let error = error { completionHandler(error) return } self.readPackets() completionHandler(nil) } } private func readPackets() { packetFlow.readPackets { [weak self] packets, protocols in self?.readPackets() } } override func stopTunnel(with reason: NEProviderStopReason, completionHandler: @escaping () -> Void) { completionHandler() } override func handleAppMessage(_ messageData: Data, completionHandler: ((Data?) -> Void)?) { if let handler = completionHandler { handler(messageData) } } override func sleep(completionHandler: @escaping () -> Void) { completionHandler() } override func wake() { } } ContentView.swift (Main app target) — trimmed to essentials: import SwiftUI import NetworkExtension struct ContentView: View { @State private var excludeAPNs = false @State private var manager: NETunnelProviderManager? var body: some View { VStack { Toggle("Exclude APNs", isOn: $excludeAPNs) .onChange(of: excludeAPNs) { Task { await saveAndReload() } } Button("Connect") { Task { await toggleVPN() } } } .padding() .task { await loadManager() } } private func loadManager() async { let managers = try? await NETunnelProviderManager.loadAllFromPreferences() if let existing = managers?.first { manager = existing } else { let m = NETunnelProviderManager() let proto = NETunnelProviderProtocol() proto.providerBundleIdentifier = "<your-extension-bundle-id>" proto.serverAddress = "127.0.0.1" proto.includeAllNetworks = true proto.excludeAPNs = excludeAPNs m.protocolConfiguration = proto m.localizedDescription = "TestVPN" m.isEnabled = true try? await m.saveToPreferences() try? await m.loadFromPreferences() manager = m } if let proto = manager?.protocolConfiguration as? NETunnelProviderProtocol { excludeAPNs = proto.excludeAPNs } } private func saveAndReload() async { guard let manager else { return } if let proto = manager.protocolConfiguration as? NETunnelProviderProtocol { proto.includeAllNetworks = true proto.excludeAPNs = excludeAPNs } manager.isEnabled = true try? await manager.saveToPreferences() try? await manager.loadFromPreferences() } private func toggleVPN() async { guard let manager else { return } if manager.connection.status == .connected { manager.connection.stopVPNTunnel() } else { await saveAndReload() try? manager.connection.startVPNTunnel() } } } Steps to reproduce Build and run the sample project with above code on a physical iOS device. Connect to a Wi-Fi network. Set excludeAPNS = true using the toggle and tap Connect. Send a push notification to the device to a test app with remote notification capability (e.g., via a test push service or the push notification console). Observe that the notification is not delivered. Disconnect. Switch to cellular. Reconnect with the same settings. Send the same push notification — observe that it is delivered. Environment iOS 26.2 Xcode 26.2 Physical device (iPhone 15 Pro)

On my Apple Developer Account, all I see is "Your enrollment is being processed. Your enrollment ID is JYD86Q79DM." This has been ongoing for almost a week now. This is the first time I am enrolling to the program and need to know how much time it takes and if I am missing any steps? Please advise