We were recently approved for the "User Assigned Device Name" for a specific app Identifier. The "Additional Capabilities" tab isn't present on that App ID. I am an admin in the developer portal, and this does not appear for the account holder as well. Any help would be appreciated.
Demystify code signing and its importance in app development. Get help troubleshooting code signing issues and ensure your app is properly signed for distribution.
Selecting any option will automatically load the page
Post
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
When building to macOS on GameMaker, I get the error "this identity cannot be used for signing code" when using the Developer ID Installer certificate. The certificate was neither expired nor revoked, but nonetheless I created new certificates to start fresh but am still getting that error. I don't get issues building to iOS via GameMaker, just to macOS.
If it makes any difference, I only noticed this issue started happening after I converted my Apple Developer Program account from an individual account to an organizational account, although it was weeks to months before I built to macOS via GameMaker before then, so I don't know if it correlates with that.
Topic:
Code Signing
SubTopic:
Certificates, Identifiers & Profiles
I’ve developed a macOS app, but I’ve had trouble using a script to fully codesign it and package it into a .dmg file. I was only able to complete codesigning using the third-party app itself—not via command-line scripts.
Is it possible to write a script that automates the entire process of codesigning the app?
To provide the best user experience for those downloading the app outside of the Mac App Store, is it correct to first package it as a .app and then wrap that into a .dmg file for distribution?
Currently, the app is available on the web as a .dmg. When downloaded, it appears in a folder and can be double-clicked to launch. However, macOS displays a warning that it was downloaded from the internet. Can I use a script to remove that quarantine warning?
If possible, I’d appreciate a step-by-step explanation and a sample command-line script to:
Codesign the app properly
Package it into a signed .dmg
Remove the quarantine attribute for local testing or distribution
Is the reason I was only able to codesign it inside the third-party app due to how that app was built, or can this always be done from the command line?
Topic:
Code Signing
SubTopic:
General
Hi all,
I’ve run into a signing/entitlements problem that shows up only on Big Sur (11.x).
The very same .app launches perfectly on Monterey (12), Ventura (13), Sonoma (14 / 14.5) and Sequoia (15).
Failure on macOS 11
com.apple.xpc.launchd[1] (application.app.myapp.exams.566312.566318[1602]):
removing service since it exited with consistent failure –
OS_REASON_CODESIGNING |
When validating …/MyAppNameBlurred 3.13.1.app/Contents/MacOS/MyAppNameBlurred 3.13.1:
Code has restricted entitlements, but the validation of its code signature failed.
Unsatisfied Entitlements:
Binary is improperly signed.
Launching from Terminal:
open -a "/Users/admin/Downloads/MyAppNameBlurred 3.13.1.app"
kLSNoLaunchPermissionErr (-10826) | Launchd job spawn failed with error: 153
What I’ve already checked
# signature itself
codesign -dvvv "/Users/admin/Downloads/MyAppNameBlurred 3.13.1.app"
# => valid, Authority = Developer ID Application, runtime enabled
# full deep/strict verification
codesign --verify --deep --strict -vvv "/Users/admin/Downloads/MyAppNameBlurred 3.13.1.app"
# => “satisfies its Designated Requirement”
# Gatekeeper assessment
spctl --assess --type execute --verbose=4 "/Users/admin/Downloads/MyAppNameBlurred 3.13.1.app"
# => accepted (override security disabled)
# embedded provisioning profile matches bundle ID
codesign -d --entitlements :- "/Users/admin/Downloads/MyAppNameBlurred 3.13.1.app" | plutil -p -
security cms -D -i "/Users/admin/Downloads/MyAppNameBlurred 3.13.1.app/Contents/embedded.provisionprofile" \
| plutil -extract Entitlements xml1 -o -
# => both show the AAC entitlement and everything looks in order
# notarization ticket
stapler validate "/Users/admin/Downloads/MyAppNameBlurred 3.13.1.app"
# => “The validate action worked!”
Deployment target: MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET = 11.0
Entitlement added: com.apple.developer.automatic-assessment-configuration = true
Provisioning profile: generated this year via Developer ID, includes the assessment entitlement and nothing else unusual.
Runtime code: we call AEAssessmentSession's network configuration part only on 12 + (guarded with @available(macOS 12.0, *)).
Has anyone hit this mismatch on 11.x? Could Big Sur be expecting something older or idk?
Any pointers appreciated!
Thanks!
Howdy,
I thought this would be an easy question, but it turns out it's really not! In fact, it flies in the face of how the Apple ecosystem is set up. That said, I still need an answer to be able to inform our customers of what their app update options are.
The question: Does app store provisioning ever expire? Based on the very limited information I can find, it either expires in one year, two years, or never. Anecdotal evidence seems to indicate that the answer could be never, but I need to confirm this.
The use case: Some of our customers are very old school. They tend to find a technical solution and stick with it. As such, they do not update apps regularly on their field iPads. They generally only update when they are forced to. They use MDM to deploy the app, and would set the MDM not to pull updated apps from the app store when available, essentially keeping the same version of the app in use for as much as 3 years or more. If this were to happen, I need to know if the provisioning for the old version of the app will ever expire if they get it from the app store.
I know with an enterprise deployment of .ipa files via MDM, the app provisioning/certificate will expire after 1 or 2 years (can't remember which atm), but I can't find an answer about app store provisioning. Hopefully someone can provide me with an answer on this forum.
Thanks in advance,
Mapguy
Topic:
Code Signing
SubTopic:
Certificates, Identifiers & Profiles
Tags:
App Store
Provisioning Profiles
Device Management
Hi there,
We've discovered a problem with our iOS app. We've been attempting to add a Driverkit driver to it, but any time we run the app through Testflight, the driver installs fine, but when we go to enable the driver toggle in the app's settings, the toggle stays on, but in the device logs I can see:
could not insert bundle at <private> into manager: <private>
As you would expect - this means the driver is not actually enabled and does not respond to a device being connected to the iPad.
This does not happen when building & running the app locally, nor does it happen when installing an Ad Hoc build.
We also have a different app, not yet shipped. We are able to add the driver to that app without issue. It works after going through Testflight.
What we have discovered now is that everything works fine even if we just create an entirely new app with it's own bundle IDs. I should point out that in all cases, we're keeping the capabilities the same for each of these apps/IDs - including the managed capabilities.
The bundle IDs that have this problem are older (5 years old or more). It seems like any newer ID will work, but trying to add the driver (and the associated managed capabilities) to an older app/ID results in this vague error message, with no further details.
If we inspect the resulting dexts, we can also see that the "Internal requirements code size" is different on the ones that fail. The failing ones have a size of 204 bytes, whereas the working ones all have a size of 220 bytes. Not sure if that's related but it's strikingly consistent.
Does this mean there is an issue with older app IDs, and we need Apple to manually refresh them in some way before the driverkit capabilities will work after going through Testflight? We have two apps in this state, both are of the same vintage (~5 years+).
We've been battling this issue for months on and off, so would appreciate some help.
Is it possible to directly distribute a macOS app with a Developer ID Certificate that belongs to a different team?
I am trying to resolve issues that arise when distributing a macOS app with a Network Extension (Packet Tunnel) outside the App Store using a Developer ID Certificate from a different team than the app’s provisioning profiles and entitlements.
I started by attempting Direct Distribution in Xcode with automatic signing. However, it fails with the following message:
Provisioning profile "Mac Team Direct Provisioning Profile: ” failed qualification checks: Profile doesn't match the entitlements file's value for the com.apple.developer.networking.networkextension entitlement.
I suspect the issue is that the provisioning profile allows "packet-tunnel-provider-systemextension", whereas the entitlements generated by Xcode contain "packet-tunnel-provider". When I manually modify the .entitlements file to include the -systemextension suffix, the project fails to build because Xcode does not recognize the modified entitlement. If there is a workaround for this issue, please let me know.
Due to these issues, I resorted to manually creating a signed and notarized app. My process is as follows:
Export the .app from the Xcode archive.
Since the exported .app does not contain the necessary entitlements or provisioning profile for direct distribution, I replace Contents/embedded.provisioningprofile in both the .app and the .appex network extension.
Sign the app and its components in the following order:
codesign --force --options runtime --timestamp --sign "Developer ID Application: <name>" <app>.app/Contents/Frameworks/<fw>.framework/
codesign --force --options runtime --timestamp --sign "Developer ID Application: <name>"<app>.app/Contents/PlugIns/<netext>.appex/Contents/Frameworks/<fw>.framework/Versions/A/<fw>
codesign --force --options runtime --entitlements dist-vpn.entitlements --timestamp --sign "Developer ID Application: <name>" <app>.app/Contents/PlugIns/<netext>.appex/
codesign --force --options runtime --entitlements dist.entitlements --timestamp --sign "Developer ID Application: <name>" <app>.app
Verify the code signature:
codesign --verify --deep --strict --verbose=4 <app>.app
- <app>.app: valid on disk
- <app>.app: satisfies its Designated Requirement
Create a ZIP archive using:
ditto -c -k --sequesterRsrc --keepParent <app>.app <app>.zip
Notarize the app with notarytool and staple it.
The notarization completes successfully with errors: nil.
Package the notarized app into a DMG, notarize, and staple the DMG.
The app runs successfully on the development machine. However, when moved to another machine and placed in /Applications, it fails to open. Inspecting Console.app reveals Gatekeeper is blocking the launch:
taskgated-helper <bundleid>: Unsatisfied entitlements: com.apple.developer.networking.networkextension, com.apple.developer.team-identifier taskgated-helper entitlements: { "com.apple.developer.networking.networkextension" = ("packet-tunnel-provider-systemextension"); "com.apple.developer.team-identifier" = <teamid>; }
As mentioned earlier, the Developer ID Certificate used for signing belongs to a different team. We are a third-party developer and do not have access to the Developer ID Certificate of the team assigned as the team-identifier.
When I changed the bundle identifier (app ID), team, entitlements, and provisioning profiles to match the team associated with the Developer ID Certificate, the app worked.
My question is:
Is this failure caused by using a Developer ID Certificate from a different team, or should it still work if the provisioning profiles and entitlements are correctly set? Could there be an issue elsewhere in the provisioning profiles or entitlements for the original app ID?
Topic:
Code Signing
SubTopic:
Certificates, Identifiers & Profiles
Tags:
Network Extension
Gatekeeper
Code Signing
Developer ID
Yesterday there were reported outages on the Developer ID Notary Service, but it was reported pretty late and we were able to notice the outages in real time. It says resolved now, however an error still persists:
Error: HTTP status code: 403. A required agreement is missing or has expired. This request requires an in-effect agreement that has not been signed or has expired. Ensure your team has signed the necessary legal agreements and that they are not expired.
Is there an ongoing outage at this moment that is not being reported again?
Our pipelines have been working flawlessly for months without intervention nor changes until the most recent outages
It's been over 24h and it's still in progress. Is there a timeout for a failed notarization? or do we just wait for days.. weeks.. moths?
Successfully received submission info
createdDate: 2025-06-25T09:52:03.153Z
id: 2ae713a5-c2e3-432f-84ee-e5d3d4aed621
name: slideshow-city-1.1.0-arm64.dmg
status: In Progress
I am subscribed to an individual developer license.
https://developer.apple.com/documentation/xcode/configuring-network-extensions
"Network Extension" does not appear in the Capability section in Xcode. Below is my Xcode screenshot.
We've been creating iOS apps for a few years now, but when I tried last month, I got an error in my XCode that says:
No profiles for 'com.os.hub.mth2' were found
Xcode couldn't find any iOS App Development provisioning profiles matching 'xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx'.
I'm not sure if it's the cause or not, but when I look at the signing certificates, the Developer ID Application Certificate says:
Missing Private Key
The weird part of that is that I see a private key with this name in my Keychain access, so I'm not sure what's wrong.
There has been a significant time gap between now and the last time we created a mobile app, so I'm not sure if something changed in XCode/MacOS to cause this issue, or if something expired.
I'd appreciate any advice.
Topic:
Code Signing
SubTopic:
Certificates, Identifiers & Profiles
Tags:
App Store Connect
Notarization
Developer ID
Yes, this is very likely the completely wrong way to do things but I would like to ask regardless.
Currently with windows/linux I can perform an in-situ upgrade of an application by performing a download of the binary 'foo' and then doing a rename-and-replace and subsequently requesting the licencee to restart the program and all is good.
With macOS, as the binary is within the foo.app ( Contents/macOS/foo ) I imagine I cannot perform a similar operation without breaking the signing of the foo.app itself?
....or, can I individually sign the binary foo for macOS and perform the same type of operation?
Download new foo as foo.new
rename current foo.app/Content/macOS/foo -> foo.old
rename foo.new -> foo
Restart application
Again, I know this is very likely an un-macOS way of performing the task but as you can imagine with supporting cross-platform development it's usually easier to maintain a consistent method even if it's "not ideal".
Topic:
Code Signing
SubTopic:
General
I'm developing an app using Electron Builder for a potential port to Windows in the future. I've had a heck of a time getting credentials to work and felt like I was in some sort of time loop doing the same things over and over again to no avail. I finally was able to sign my app, sign the .dmg and start the notarization process. That was last night and it still says "In Progress". If anyone is able to push it through, that would be awesome! (id: 2520e724-7069-408a-9ea4-60b23e8435a7)
I saw another thread on here where people stated it was taking forever, I'm not sure if this is just because its my first time, but I was hoping to get a beta out to testers this weekend. I just need a version that doesn't get flagged as "Malware" by Gatekeeper. This is just for a standalone macOS application, not the App Store.
Is there a reason that this process takes an absurd amount of time? Will it always be like this or is this just a fluke and it was a bad time to try?
Thanks in advance for any hint to solve the following account problem:
I tried to store credentials for notarizing.
Presumably with the wrong combination of entries (similar to signing) – using the name of my university instead of my Apple Account.
xcrun notarytool store-credentials "notarytool-password" --apple-id "Berliner Hochschule fuer Technik" --team-id "8YAW3HL2QP" --password "my Apple-Account-pw"
.. retried assuming a syntax error (like missing ").
Got the error message:
This process stores your credentials securely in the Keychain. You reference these credentials later using a profile name.
Validating your credentials...
`Error: HTTP status code: 401. Your Apple ID has been locked. Visit iForgot to reset your account (https://iforgot.apple.com), then generate a new app-specific password. Ensure that all authentication arguments are correct.`
Happy to see: Signing is not affected and I still an can log in to my account on developer.apple.com. So notarizing “only” seems to be affected.
But how to reset the account to resolve the issue?
The iforgot.apple.com link does not help - I provided my iPhone-number but did not receive further messages – neither on the iPhone nor on my “developer” macbook.
Many thanks in advance
All the best
Florian
This is a continuation of my own old post that became inactive to regain traction. I am trying to resolve issues that arise when distributing a macOS app with a SysExt Network Extension (Packet Tunnel) outside the App Store using a Developer ID Certificate.
To directly distribute the app, I start with exporting the .app via Archive in Xcode.
After that, I create a new Developer ID provisioning profile for both the app and sysext and replace the embedded ones in the .app package.
After I have replaced the provisioning profiles and the have the entitlements files ready, I start signing the frameworks, sysext and parent app.
codesign --force --options runtime --timestamp --sign "Developer ID Application: <name>"<app>.app/Contents/Library/SystemExtensions/<sysext>.systemextension/Contents/Frameworks/<fw>.framework/Versions/A/<fw>
codesign --force --options runtime --timestamp --sign "Developer ID Application: <name>" <app>.app/Contents/Frameworks/<fw>.framework/
codesign --force --options runtime --entitlements dist-vpn.entitlements --timestamp --sign "Developer ID Application: <name>" <app>.app/Contents/Library/SystemExtensions/<sysext>.systemextension/Contents/MacOS/<sysext>
codesign --force --options runtime --entitlements dist.entitlements --timestamp --sign "Developer ID Application: <name>" <app>.app
After validation is successful with
codesign --verify --deep --strict --verbose=4 <app>.app
I zip the package, notarize and staple it
ditto -c -k --keepParent "<app>.app" "<app>..zip"
xcrun notarytool submit <app>.zip --keychain-profile “”<credents> --wait
xcrun stapler staple <app>.app
After that I finish creating signed and notarized .dmg/.pkg.
hdiutil create -volname “<app>” -srcfolder “<app>.app/" -ov -format UDZO ./<app>.dmg
codesign --force --sign "Developer ID Application: <name>" <app>.dmg
xcrun notarytool submit <app>.dmg --keychain-profile "<credentials>" --wait
xcrun stapler staple <app>.dmg
Then when I move the .dmg to a clean system, open the .dmg, move the .app to the Applications folder, the attempt to run it fails with “The application “” can’t be opened.”. When I look into the console, the gatekeeper disallows the launch job with the message:
86127 debug ProvisioningProfiles taskgated-helper ConfigurationProfiles entitlements: {
"com.apple.developer.networking.networkextension" = (
"packet-tunnel-provider-systemextension"
);
"com.apple.developer.system-extension.install" = 1;
"com.apple.developer.team-identifier" = <teamid>;
"keychain-access-groups" = (
“<teamid>.<app>.AppGroup"
);
} com.apple.ManagedClient
<app>: Unsatisfied entitlements: com.apple.developer.networking.networkextension, keychain-access-groups, com.apple.developer.system-extension.install, com.apple.developer.team-identifier
LAUNCH: Runningboard launch of <app> <private> returned RBSRequestErrorFailed, error Error Domain=RBSRequestErrorDomain Code=5 "Launch failed." UserInfo={NSLocalizedFailureReason=Launch failed., NSUnderlyingError=0x600001a25830 {Error Domain=NSPOSIXErrorDomain Code=153 "Unknown error: 153" UserInfo={NSLocalizedDescription=Launchd job spawn failed}}}, so returning -10810
I went through all possible formats (macOS-Style and iOS-Style App Group IDs) and combinations of appgroups according to the post “App Groups: macOS vs iOS: Working Towards Harmony”. But none of those work for me. The weird part is that when I try the same steps on different developer account, I am able to get the app running. What can be wrong?
Topic:
Code Signing
SubTopic:
Entitlements
Tags:
Network Extension
Gatekeeper
Code Signing
Developer ID
I've signed an app, zipped it, and uploaded it to github. When I download it on another Mac, I get "it can't be opened because it could not be verified for malware".
But on that computer, I can verify it with codesign, and it appears to be correct (as far as I can tell).
I can copy/paste the app from my other Mac, and that copy will run without problem.
sys_policy, however, gives:
Notary Ticket Missing
File: ReView.app
Severity: Fatal
Full Error: A Notarization ticket is not stapled to this application.
Type: Distribution Error
This is the same for the copy that runs, and the copy that doesn't.
The difference between them appears to be a quarantine xattr. I can delete this, and the app launches without incident.
Is this expected? Why should a signed app be quarantined just because it's been downloaded?
The whole point of paying the fee is to avoid the security obstacles...! ;-)
Hi, I am working on a personal HIDDriverKit project. The documentation suggests that you do not need the entitlements from Apple to do local development - that all you need to do is turn of SIP, enable developer mode, and turn signing to "Sign to Run Locally".
However, I have followed all of these steps, and am still running into the error that to build, I need to have a provisioning profile with the DriverKit (development) feature (MacOS 15.2 Xcode 16.2).
Am I missing something here regarding the steps for local development? Does one need to request a development version of the entitlements even for local development? Do I need a paid developer account to do this?
Thank-you in advance.
Hi there!
I have an issue with uploading a PKG installer to the MacOS AppStore.
Uploading with:
xcrun altool --upload-app -t macos -f $PKGPATH -u $DEVELOPER_ID -p $APP_SPECIFIC_PWD
results in error:
*** Error: Validation failed Invalid Provisioning Profile. The provisioning profile included in the bundle com.frogblue.frogCom [com.frogblue.frogCom.pkg/Payload/frogSIP.app] is invalid. [Missing code-signing certificate.] For more information, visit the macOS Developer Portal. (ID: fc4e5488-6d09-4ab2-b1f7-017a33c69723) (409)
Application seems to be correctly code signed with „3rd Party Mac Developer Application“ certificate.
codesign -dv --verbose=4 /Users/dietmar.finkler/Desktop/frogSIP/deploy/frogSIP.app
Identifier=com.frogblue.frogCom
Format=app bundle with Mach-O universal (x86_64 arm64)
CodeDirectory v=20500 size=266432 flags=0x10000(runtime) hashes=8315+7 location=embedded
VersionPlatform=1
VersionMin=720896
VersionSDK=918784
Hash type=sha256 size=32
CandidateCDHash sha256=923de799a54616706b76050b50b7ee6d59f8355a
CandidateCDHashFull sha256=923de799a54616706b76050b50b7ee6d59f8355a65aa7cce03e34bb2033da1e9
Hash choices=sha256
CMSDigest=923de799a54616706b76050b50b7ee6d59f8355a65aa7cce03e34bb2033da1e9
CMSDigestType=2
Executable Segment base=0
Executable Segment limit=31604736
Executable Segment flags=0x1
Page size=4096
CDHash=923de799a54616706b76050b50b7ee6d59f8355a
Signature size=9109
Authority=3rd Party Mac Developer Application: frogblue TECHNOLOGY GmbH (UG2P6T5LNH)
Authority=Apple Worldwide Developer Relations Certification Authority
Authority=Apple Root CA
Timestamp=26.02.2025 at 10:07:08
Info.plist entries=31
TeamIdentifier=UG2P6T5LNH
Runtime Version=14.5.0
Sealed Resources version=2 rules=13 files=1124
Internal requirements count=1 size=212
The PKG build with productbuild seems also be correctly code signed with„3rd Party Mac Developer Installer“ certificate.
pkgutil --check-signature /Users/dietmar.finkler/Desktop/frogSIP/frogSIP-1.2a2.pkg
Status: signed by a developer certificate issued by Apple (Development)
Certificate Chain:
1. 3rd Party Mac Developer Installer: frogblue TECHNOLOGY GmbH (UG2P6T5LNH)
Expires: 2026-02-25 17:17:54 +0000
SHA256 Fingerprint:
D1 9E AC 27 C7 26 F3 2E 1E F5 50 2C 7A 1B 1D FB 54 D6 17 C1 1C 58
C1 7E F8 87 B6 44 D1 49 17 DC
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Apple Worldwide Developer Relations Certification Authority
Expires: 2030-02-20 00:00:00 +0000
SHA256 Fingerprint:
DC F2 18 78 C7 7F 41 98 E4 B4 61 4F 03 D6 96 D8 9C 66 C6 60 08 D4
24 4E 1B 99 16 1A AC 91 60 1F
------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. Apple Root CA
Expires: 2035-02-09 21:40:36 +0000
SHA256 Fingerprint:
B0 B1 73 0E CB C7 FF 45 05 14 2C 49 F1 29 5E 6E DA 6B CA ED 7E 2C
68 C5 BE 91 B5 A1 10 01 F0 24
KeyChain login items show both "3rd Party Mac Developer Application" and "3rd Party Mac Developer Installer“ certificates.
But checking with
security find-identity -v -p codesigning
shows only the "3rd Party Mac Developer Application“ certificate. "3rd Party Mac Developer Installer“ is missing.
I check also the entitlement in the app package, which looks ok for me.
codesign -d --entitlements :- /Users/dietmar.finkler/Desktop/frogSIP/deploy/frogSIP.app
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE plist PUBLIC "-//Apple//DTD PLIST 1.0//EN" "https://www.apple.com/DTDs/PropertyList-1.0.dtd"><plist version="1.0"><dict><key>com.apple.application-identifier</key><string>UG2P6T5LNH.com.frogblue.frogCom</string><key>com.apple.developer.aps-environment</key><string>production</string><key>com.apple.developer.associated-domains</key><array><string>applinks:go.dev.frogblue.cloud</string><string>applinks:go.test.frogblue.cloud</string><string>applinks:go.prod.frogblue.cloud</string></array><key>com.apple.developer.team-identifier</key><string>UG2P6T5LNH</string><key>com.apple.security.app-sandbox</key><true/><key>com.apple.security.cs.disable-library-validation</key><true/><key>com.apple.security.device.audio-input</key><true/><key>com.apple.security.device.camera</key><true/><key>com.apple.security.network.client</key><true/><key>com.apple.security.network.server</key><true/></dict></plist>
What I am missing?
Thanx for any hint!
Regards
Dietmar Finkler
Hi guys,
I got an error about mac notarization result return 132.
here is the stack trace on the logs:
2025-02-25 02:53:55,503 ERROR [org.ecl.cbi.ws.mac.not.xcr.not.NotarytoolNotarizer] (macos-notarization-service-pool-thread-13) Error while parsing the output after the upload of '/tmp/macos-notarization-service/pending-files/myapplication.dmg' to the Apple notarization service: org.xml.sax.SAXParseException; lineNumber: 1; columnNumber: 1; Premature end of file.
at java.xml/com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.util.ErrorHandlerWrapper.createSAXParseException(ErrorHandlerWrapper.java:204)
at java.xml/com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.util.ErrorHandlerWrapper.fatalError(ErrorHandlerWrapper.java:178)
at java.xml/com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.impl.XMLErrorReporter.reportError(XMLErrorReporter.java:400)
at java.xml/com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.impl.XMLErrorReporter.reportError(XMLErrorReporter.java:327)
at java.xml/com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.impl.XMLScanner.reportFatalError(XMLScanner.java:1465)
at java.xml/com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.impl.XMLDocumentScannerImpl$PrologDriver.next(XMLDocumentScannerImpl.java:1013)
at java.xml/com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.impl.XMLDocumentScannerImpl.next(XMLDocumentScannerImpl.java:605)
at java.xml/com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.impl.XMLDocumentFragmentScannerImpl.scanDocument(XMLDocumentFragmentScannerImpl.java:542)
at java.xml/com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.parsers.XML11Configuration.parse(XML11Configuration.java:889)
at java.xml/com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.parsers.XML11Configuration.parse(XML11Configuration.java:825)
at java.xml/com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.parsers.XMLParser.parse(XMLParser.java:141)
at java.xml/com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.parsers.AbstractSAXParser.parse(AbstractSAXParser.java:1224)
at java.xml/com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.jaxp.SAXParserImpl$JAXPSAXParser.parse(SAXParserImpl.java:637)
at java.xml/com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.jaxp.SAXParserImpl.parse(SAXParserImpl.java:326)
at java.xml/javax.xml.parsers.SAXParser.parse(SAXParser.java:197)
at org.eclipse.cbi.ws.macos.notarization.xcrun.common.PListDict.fromXML(PListDict.java:134)
at org.eclipse.cbi.ws.macos.notarization.xcrun.notarytool.NotarytoolNotarizer.analyzeSubmissionResult(NotarytoolNotarizer.java:39)
at org.eclipse.cbi.ws.macos.notarization.xcrun.common.NotarizationTool.upload(NotarizationTool.java:50)
at org.eclipse.cbi.ws.macos.notarization.xcrun.common.Notarizer.lambda$uploadFailsafe$3(Notarizer.java:65)
at net.jodah.failsafe.Functions.lambda$get$0(Functions.java:48)
at net.jodah.failsafe.RetryPolicyExecutor.lambda$supply$0(RetryPolicyExecutor.java:66)
at net.jodah.failsafe.Execution.executeSync(Execution.java:128)
at net.jodah.failsafe.FailsafeExecutor.call(FailsafeExecutor.java:379)
at net.jodah.failsafe.FailsafeExecutor.get(FailsafeExecutor.java:68)
at org.eclipse.cbi.ws.macos.notarization.xcrun.common.Notarizer.uploadFailsafe(Notarizer.java:65)
at org.eclipse.cbi.ws.macos.notarization.NotarizationService.lambda$notarize$0(NotarizationService.java:192)
at java.base/java.util.concurrent.CompletableFuture$AsyncSupply.run(CompletableFuture.java:1768)
at java.base/java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:539)
at java.base/java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:264)
at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:304)
at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1136)
at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:635)
at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:840)
Do you know why?
If you have any thread or documents telling about the details of return values of the command: 'xcrun notarytool submit'
Displaying attribute for a private key I see a number of applications that are allowed to access it without needing a password e.g. racoon; Keychain Access.app; Certificate Assitant.app etc..
I want to add /usr/bin/codesign to the list but the gui window that pops up when I click on + doesn't seem to allow me to do that :(
How do I do it please
Topic:
Code Signing
SubTopic:
General