We are investigating SKAdNetwork attribution for a production iOS app distributed through the App Store.
Bundle ID: com.stencilstudio.app
App Store ID: 6760613806
We receive real winning SKAdNetwork postbacks directly from the App Store at our attribution endpoint. The raw Apple payloads consistently contain:
version: "3.0"
campaign-id: 25
did-win: true
Some postbacks also include a valid fine conversion value, for example:
conversion-value: 1
However, we have not received postbacks containing:
version: "4.0"
source-identifier
postback-sequence-index
coarse-conversion-value
The advertising network is Meta.
The advertised app is App Store distributed and has an iOS deployment target of 16.1.
We are trying to understand one specific technical point:
What determines whether the resulting production attribution postback is SKAdNetwork 3.0 or 4.0?
In particular:
Is the postback version determined by the SKAdNetwork version used by the ad network when signing the winning ad impression?
Can anything on the advertised-app side, such as an entitlement, App Store Connect setting, build configuration, registration state, or SDK configuration, cause an attribution to remain on version 3.0?
Is there any advertiser-side diagnostic that allows the advertised-app developer to determine which SKAdNetwork version the winning impression was signed with?
Given that the postbacks themselves explicitly contain version: "3.0", is there any other condition we should verify on the advertised-app side before asking the ad network to investigate how its impressions are being signed?
Example raw postback received directly from the App Store:
{
"app-id": 6760613806,
"fidelity-type": 1,
"conversion-value": 1,
"campaign-id": 25,
"did-win": true,
"version": "3.0",
"ad-network-id": "v9wttpbfk9.skadnetwork",
"redownload": false
}
We can provide additional production postbacks if useful.
0
0
52