At WWDC25 we launched a new type of Lab event for the developer community - Group Labs. A Group Lab is a panel Q&A designed for a large audience of developers. Group Labs are a unique opportunity for the community to submit questions directly to a panel of Apple engineers and designers. Here are the highlights from the WWDC25 Group Lab for UI Frameworks. How would you recommend developers start adopting the new design? Start by focusing on the foundational structural elements of your application, working from the "top down" or "bottom up" based on your application's hierarchy. These structural changes, like edge-to-edge content and updated navigation and controls, often require corresponding code modifications. As a first step, recompile your application with the new SDK to see what updates are automatically applied, especially if you've been using standard controls. Then, carefully analyze where the new design elements can be applied to your UI, paying particular attention to custom controls or UI that could benefit from a refresh. Address the large structural items first then focus on smaller details is recommended. Will we need to migrate our UI code to Swift and SwiftUI to adopt the new design? No, you will not need to migrate your UI code to Swift and SwiftUI to adopt the new design. The UI frameworks fully support the new design, allowing you to migrate your app with as little effort as possible, especially if you've been using standard controls. The goal is to make it easy to adopt the new design, regardless of your current UI framework, to achieve a cohesive look across the operating system. What was the reason for choosing Liquid Glass over frosted glass, as used in visionOS? The choice of Liquid Glass was driven by the desire to bring content to life. The see-through nature of Liquid Glass enhances this effect. The appearance of Liquid Glass adapts based on its size; larger glass elements look more frosted, which aligns with the design of visionOS, where everything feels larger and benefits from the frosted look. What are best practices for apps that use customized navigation bars? The new design emphasizes behavior and transitions as much as static appearance. Consider whether you truly need a custom navigation bar, or if the system-provided controls can meet your needs. Explore new APIs for subtitles and custom views in navigation bars, designed to support common use cases. If you still require a custom solution, ensure you're respecting safe areas using APIs like SwiftUI's safeAreaInset. When working with Liquid Glass, group related buttons in shared containers to maintain design consistency. Finally, mark glass containers as interactive. For branding, instead of coloring the navigation bar directly, consider incorporating branding colors into the content area behind the Liquid Glass controls. This creates a dynamic effect where the color is visible through the glass and moves with the content as the user scrolls. I want to know why new UI Framework APIs aren’t backward compatible, specifically in SwiftUI? It leads to code with lots of if-else statements. Existing APIs have been updated to work with the new design where possible, ensuring that apps using those APIs will adopt the new design and function on both older and newer operating systems. However, new APIs often depend on deep integration across the framework and graphics stack, making backward compatibility impractical. When using these new APIs, it's important to consider how they fit within the context of the latest OS. The use of if-else statements allows you to maintain compatibility with older systems while taking full advantage of the new APIs and design features on newer systems. If you are using new APIs, it likely means you are implementing something very specific to the new design language. Using conditional code allows you to intentionally create different code paths for the new design versus older operating systems. Prefer to use if #available where appropriate to intentionally adopt new design elements. Are there any Liquid Glass materials in iOS or macOS that are only available as part of dedicated components? Or are all those materials available through new UIKit and AppKit views? Yes, some variations of the Liquid Glass material are exclusively available through dedicated components like sliders, segmented controls, and tab bars. However, the "regular" and "clear" glass materials should satisfy most application requirements. If you encounter situations where these options are insufficient, please file feedback. If I were to create an app today, how should I design it to make it future proof using Liquid Glass? The best approach to future-proof your app is to utilize standard system controls and design your UI to align with the standard system look and feel. Using the framework-provided declarative API generally leads to easier adoption of future design changes, as you're expressing intent rather than specifying pixel-perfect visuals. Pay close attention to the design sessions offered this year, which cover the design motivation behind the Liquid Glass material and best practices for its use. Is it possible to implement your own sidebar on macOS without NSSplitViewController, but still provide the Liquid Glass appearance? While technically possible to create a custom sidebar that approximates the Liquid Glass appearance without using NSSplitViewController, it is not recommended. The system implementation of the sidebar involves significant unseen complexity, including interlayering with scroll edge effects and fullscreen behaviors. NSSplitViewController provides the necessary level of abstraction for the framework to handle these details correctly. Regarding the SceneDelagate and scene based life-cycle, I would like to confirm that AppDelegate is not going away. Also if the above is a correct understanding, is there any advice as to what should, and should not, be moved to the SceneDelegate? UIApplicationDelegate is not going away and still serves a purpose for application-level interactions with the system and managing scenes at a higher level. Move code related to your app's scene or UI into the UISceneDelegate. Remember that adopting scenes doesn't necessarily mean supporting multiple scenes; an app can be scene-based but still support only one scene. Refer to the tech note Migrating to the UIKit scene-based life cycle and the Make your UIKit app more flexible WWDC25 session for more information.

Hello, and an early "Merry Christmas" to all, I'm building a SwiftUI app, and one of my Views is a fullscreen UIViewRepresentable (SpriteView) beneath a SwiftUI interface. Whenever the user interacts with any SwiftUI element, the UIView registers a hit in touchesBegan(). For example, my UIView has logic for pinching (not implemented via UIGestureRecognizer), so whenever the user holds down a SwiftUI element while touching the UIView, that counts as two touches to the UIView which invokes the pinching logic. Things I've tried to block SwiftUI from passing the gesture down to the UIView: Adding opaque elements beneath control elements Adding gestures to the elements above Adding gesture masks to the gestures above Converting eligible elements to Buttons (since those seem immune) Adding SpriteViews beneath those elements to absorb gestures So far nothing has worked. As long as the UIView is beneath SwiftUI elements, any interactions with those elements will be registered as a hit. The obvious solution is to track each SwiftUI element's size and coordinates with respect to the UIView's coordinate space, then use exclusion areas, but this is both a pain and expensive, and I find it hard to believe this is the best fix for such a seemingly basic problem. I'm probably overlooking something basic, so any suggestions will be greatly appreciated

I’m trying to record videos with AvAssetWriter but sometimes my videos exempt audio buffers recorded and when audio is included, the stream of video buffers stops. the gist below is my code. https://gist.github.com/kwameaj67/70a3409c84d48cf758b3734c08a46244

I am working on a SwiftUI project where I need to dynamically update the UI by adding or removing components based on some event. The challenge is handling complex UI structures efficiently while ensuring smooth animations and state management. Example Scenario: I have a screen displaying a list of items. When a user taps an item, additional details (like a subview or expanded section) should appear dynamically. If the user taps again, the additional content should disappear. The UI should animate these changes smoothly without causing unnecessary re-renders. My Current Approach: I have tried using @State and if conditions to toggle views, like this: struct ContentView: View { @State private var showDetails = false var body: some View { VStack { Button("Toggle Details") { showDetails.toggle() } if showDetails { Text("Additional Information") .transition(.slide) // Using animation } } .animation(.easeInOut, value: showDetails) } } However, in complex UI scenarios where multiple components need to be shown/hidden dynamically, this approach is not maintainable and could cause performance issues. I need help with the below questions. Questions: State Management: Should I use @State, @Binding, or @ObservedObject for handling dynamic UI updates efficiently? Best Practices: What are the best practices for structuring SwiftUI views to handle dynamic updates without excessive re-renders? Performance Optimization: How can I prevent unnecessary recomputations when updating only specific UI sections? Animations & Transitions: What is the best way to apply animations smoothly while toggling visibility of multiple components? Advanced Approaches: Are there better techniques using @EnvironmentObject, ViewBuilder, or even GeometryReader for dynamically adjusting UI layouts? Any insights, code examples, or resources would be greatly appreciated.

I am able to retrieve the text in the input field by doing: let contextBeforeInput = textDocumentProxy.documentContextBeforeInput ?? "" let contextAfterInput = textDocumentProxy.documentContextAfterInput ?? "" let fullText = contextBeforeInput + contextAfterInput However, when I'm pasting text into the input field, textDocumentProxy.documentContextBeforeInput refuses to return the entire text from the input field but instead only returns the last two sentences. I have tried this with the input fields in WhatsApp, Signal, and Telegram and it's all the same, so it doesn't seem to be caused by the specific app. At first I thought it was a limitation imposed by Apple but other third party keyboard extensions such as Grammarly are able to pick up the whole pasted text from the input field, so how are they doing it?

Hello! Is there a way to perform an action before alert (no matter which) appears and sheet (no matter which) opens? Perhaps, system event or something like this.

I think it can be dismissed with dismiss() onInAppPurchaseCompletion action handler but I have no reason to handle it, and if it's not handled it will show error alerts for you (see documentation). How can I dismiss it and still benefit from default onInAppPurchaseCompletion action? Thanks,

With "Requires full screen" Split View and Slide Over are disabled but the line on the bottom of the screen remains. How can that line removed as when a video is displayed full screen?

So I am looking to use a custom NSWindow application (so I can implement some enhanced resizing/dragging behavior which is only possible overriding NSWindow). The problem is my whole application is currently SwiftUI-based (see the project here: https://github.com/msdrigg/Roam/blob/50a2a641aa5f2fccb4382e14dbb410c1679d8b0c/Roam/RoamApp.swift). I know there is a way to make this work by dropping my @main SwiftUI app and replacing it with a SwiftUI root view hosted in a standard AppKit root app, but that feels like I'm going backwards. Is there another way to get access (and override) the root NSWindow for a SwiftUI app?

Based on crash reports for our app in production, we're seeing these SwiftUI crashes but couldn't figure out why it is there. These crashes are pretty frequent (>20 crashed per day). Would really appreciate it if anyone has any insight on why this happens. Based on the stacktrace, i can't really find anything that links back to our app (replaced with MyApp in the stacktrace). Thank you in advance! Crashed: com.apple.main-thread 0 libdispatch.dylib 0x39dcc _dispatch_semaphore_dispose.cold.1 + 40 1 libdispatch.dylib 0x4c1c _dispatch_semaphore_signal_slow + 82 2 libdispatch.dylib 0x2d30 _dispatch_dispose + 208 3 SwiftUICore 0x77f788 destroy for StoredLocationBase.Data + 64 4 libswiftCore.dylib 0x3b56fc swift_arrayDestroy + 196 5 libswiftCore.dylib 0x13a60 UnsafeMutablePointer.deinitialize(count:) + 40 6 SwiftUICore 0x95f374 AtomicBuffer.deinit + 124 7 SwiftUICore 0x95f39c AtomicBuffer.__deallocating_deinit + 16 8 libswiftCore.dylib 0x3d783c _swift_release_dealloc + 56 9 libswiftCore.dylib 0x3d8950 bool swift::RefCounts<swift::RefCountBitsT<(swift::RefCountInlinedness)1>>::doDecrementSlow<(swift::PerformDeinit)1>(swift::RefCountBitsT<(swift::RefCountInlinedness)1>, unsigned int) + 160 10 SwiftUICore 0x77e53c StoredLocation.deinit + 32 11 SwiftUICore 0x77e564 StoredLocation.__deallocating_deinit + 16 12 libswiftCore.dylib 0x3d783c _swift_release_dealloc + 56 13 libswiftCore.dylib 0x3d8950 bool swift::RefCounts<swift::RefCountBitsT<(swift::RefCountInlinedness)1>>::doDecrementSlow<(swift::PerformDeinit)1>(swift::RefCountBitsT<(swift::RefCountInlinedness)1>, unsigned int) + 160 14 MyApp 0x1673338 objectdestroyTm + 6922196 15 libswiftCore.dylib 0x3d783c _swift_release_dealloc + 56 16 libswiftCore.dylib 0x3d8950 bool swift::RefCounts<swift::RefCountBitsT<(swift::RefCountInlinedness)1>>::doDecrementSlow<(swift::PerformDeinit)1>(swift::RefCountBitsT<(swift::RefCountInlinedness)1>, unsigned int) + 160 17 SwiftUICore 0x650290 _AppearanceActionModifier.MergedBox.__deallocating_deinit + 32 18 libswiftCore.dylib 0x3d783c _swift_release_dealloc + 56 19 libswiftCore.dylib 0x3d8950 bool swift::RefCounts<swift::RefCountBitsT<(swift::RefCountInlinedness)1>>::doDecrementSlow<(swift::PerformDeinit)1>(swift::RefCountBitsT<(swift::RefCountInlinedness)1>, unsigned int) + 160 20 SwiftUICore 0x651b44 closure #1 in _AppearanceActionModifier.MergedBox.update()partial apply + 28 21 libswiftCore.dylib 0x3d783c _swift_release_dealloc + 56 22 libswiftCore.dylib 0x3d8950 bool swift::RefCounts<swift::RefCountBitsT<(swift::RefCountInlinedness)1>>::doDecrementSlow<(swift::PerformDeinit)1>(swift::RefCountBitsT<(swift::RefCountInlinedness)1>, unsigned int) + 160 23 libswiftCore.dylib 0x3b56fc swift_arrayDestroy + 196 24 libswiftCore.dylib 0xa2a54 _ContiguousArrayStorage.__deallocating_deinit + 96 25 libswiftCore.dylib 0x3d783c _swift_release_dealloc + 56 26 libswiftCore.dylib 0x3d8950 bool swift::RefCounts<swift::RefCountBitsT<(swift::RefCountInlinedness)1>>::doDecrementSlow<(swift::PerformDeinit)1>(swift::RefCountBitsT<(swift::RefCountInlinedness)1>, unsigned int) + 160 27 SwiftUICore 0x4a6c4c type metadata accessor for _ContiguousArrayStorage<CVarArg> + 120 28 libswiftCore.dylib 0x3d783c _swift_release_dealloc + 56 29 libswiftCore.dylib 0x3d8950 bool swift::RefCounts<swift::RefCountBitsT<(swift::RefCountInlinedness)1>>::doDecrementSlow<(swift::PerformDeinit)1>(swift::RefCountBitsT<(swift::RefCountInlinedness)1>, unsigned int) + 160 30 SwiftUICore 0x4a5d88 static Update.dispatchActions() + 1332 31 SwiftUICore 0xa0db28 closure #2 in closure #1 in ViewRendererHost.render(interval:updateDisplayList:targetTimestamp:) + 132 32 SwiftUICore 0xa0d928 closure #1 in ViewRendererHost.render(interval:updateDisplayList:targetTimestamp:) + 708 33 SwiftUICore 0xa0b0d4 ViewRendererHost.render(interval:updateDisplayList:targetTimestamp:) + 556 34 SwiftUI 0x8f1634 UIHostingViewBase.renderForPreferences(updateDisplayList:) + 168 35 SwiftUI 0x8f495c closure #1 in UIHostingViewBase.requestImmediateUpdate() + 72 36 SwiftUI 0xcc700 thunk for @escaping @callee_guaranteed () -> () + 36 37 libdispatch.dylib 0x2370 _dispatch_call_block_and_release + 32 38 libdispatch.dylib 0x40d0 _dispatch_client_callout + 20 39 libdispatch.dylib 0x129e0 _dispatch_main_queue_drain + 980 40 libdispatch.dylib 0x125fc _dispatch_main_queue_callback_4CF + 44 41 CoreFoundation 0x56204 __CFRUNLOOP_IS_SERVICING_THE_MAIN_DISPATCH_QUEUE__ + 16 42 CoreFoundation 0x53440 __CFRunLoopRun + 1996 43 CoreFoundation 0x52830 CFRunLoopRunSpecific + 588 44 GraphicsServices 0x11c4 GSEventRunModal + 164 45 UIKitCore 0x3d2eb0 -[UIApplication _run] + 816 46 UIKitCore 0x4815b4 UIApplicationMain + 340 47 SwiftUI 0x101f98 closure #1 in KitRendererCommon(_:) + 168 48 SwiftUI 0xe2664 runApp<A>(_:) + 100 49 SwiftUI 0xe5490 static App.main() + 180 50 MyApp 0x8a7828 main + 4340250664 (MyApp.swift:4340250664) 51 ??? 0x1ba496ec8 (Missing)

I tried to use AppIntentConfiguration in iOS17 to fail to achieve such a dynamic configuration. code： struct ConfigurationAppIntent: WidgetConfigurationIntent {     static var title: LocalizedStringResource { "位置" }     static var description: IntentDescription { "选择位置以展示城市天气" }     @Parameter(title: "Select City", optionsProvider: CityOptionsProvider())     var selectedCity: String? }

My code extension MyViewController: UICollectionViewDelegate, UICollectionViewDataSource { func collectionView( _ collectionView: UICollectionView, cellForItemAt indexPath: IndexPath ) -> UICollectionViewCell { if let cell = collectionView.dequeueReusableCell( withReuseIdentifier: "CollectionViewCellID", for: indexPath ) as? CollectionViewCell { cell.setup() return cell } return UICollectionViewCell() } func collectionView( _ collectionView: UICollectionView, didSelectItemAt indexPath: IndexPath ) { // Unnecessary dequeue guard collectionView.dequeueReusableCell( withReuseIdentifier: "CollectionViewCellID", for: indexPath ) is CollectionViewCell else { return } // My action for selecting cell print("Cell Selected") } } Error: *** Assertion failure in -[UICollectionView _updateVisibleCellsNow:], UICollectionView.m:5673 *** Terminating app due to uncaught exception 'NSInternalInconsistencyException', reason: 'Expected dequeued view to be returned to the collection view in preparation for display. When the collection view's data source is asked to provide a view for a given index path, ensure that a single view is dequeued and returned to the collection view. Avoid dequeuing views without a request from the collection view. For retrieving an existing view in the collection view, use -[UICollectionView cellForItemAtIndexPath:] or -[UICollectionView supplementaryViewForElementKind:atIndexPath:]. Solution: The problem was doing unnecessary dequeuing in didSelectItemAt when selecting the cell. In previous iOS like 17 or 16 or lower, it was allowed to dequeue where it is not really needed but from iOS 18, it may restricted to unnecessary dequeuing. So better to remove dequeue and use cellForItem(at) if we need to get cell from collection view. Example extension MyViewController: UICollectionViewDelegate, UICollectionViewDataSource { func collectionView( _ collectionView: UICollectionView, cellForItemAt indexPath: IndexPath ) -> UICollectionViewCell { if let cell = collectionView.dequeueReusableCell( withReuseIdentifier: "CollectionViewCellID", for: indexPath ) as? CollectionViewCell { cell.setup() return cell } return UICollectionViewCell() } func collectionView( _ collectionView: UICollectionView, didSelectItemAt indexPath: IndexPath ) { guard collectionView.cellForItem(at: indexPath) is CollectionViewCell else { return } // My action for selecting cell print("Cell Selected") } }

I have a SwiftUI app that needs to be able to receive photos and videos from the Photos app. When the user shares an item from the Photos app they can choose to share to a destination app. When doing so from the Files app, my app appears as a share destination and the .onOpenURL successfully handles the incoming content. The CFBundleTypeName and CFBundleTypeRole have been configured accordingly. What I don't understand is why I can share from the Files app and select my app as the destination, while not being able to select my app when sharing from the Photos app. What does the Photos app require to allow a given app to available as a share destination? I'd also like to be able to do this from other apps such as the YouTube app.

Hi Apple team and community, We’re encountering a strange issue with Live Activity that seems related to memory management or background lifecycle. ❓ Issue: Our app updates a Live Activity regularly (every 3 minutes) using .update(...). However, after the app remains in the background for around 8 hours, the Live Activity reverts to the initial state that was passed into .request(...). Even though the app continues sending updates in the background, the UI on the Lock Screen and Dynamic Island resets to the original state.

I am working on Agora Voice Call and using CallKit to manage incoming and outgoing calls. Issue: When I accept a call, CallKit goes behind my app. I want CallKit to remain in front of my app. Please guide me.

I want to add the option to choose an alternative icon inside the app. Is there a way to load an icon asset from within the app? I downloaded Apple’s alternative icon sample, which is supposed to show a list of icons to choose from, but even in the sample, it did not work. So the current solution is to add every alternative icon along with another image asset of the same image to display to the user. This sounds like a waste of bytes. Thank you in advance for any help.

I have a simple SwiftUI Text: Text(t) .font(Font.system(size: 9)) Strangely its ideal height seems to be larger when it is empty. I initially observed this in a custom Layout container that wasn't working quite right. Eventually I looked at the height returned by v.dimensions(in:), and found that when t is non-empty the height is 11; when empty, it's 14. Subsequently I observed similar behaviour in a regular VStack container. Has anyone seen anything similar? Are there any properties that could affect this behaviour? (This is on a watch - I don't know if that matters.)

A NavigationStack with a singular enum for .navigationDestination() works fine. Both NavigationLinks(value:) and directly manipulating the NavigationPath work fine for moving around views. Zero problems. The issue is when we instead use a NavigationSplitView, I've only dabbled with two-column splits (sidebar and detail) so far. Now, if the sidebar has its own NavigationStack, everything works nicely on an iPhone, but on an iPad, you can't push views onto the detail from the sidebar. (They're pushed on the sidebar) You can solve this by keeping a NavigationStack ONLY on the detail. Sidebar links now properly push onto the detail, and the detail can move around views by itself. However, if you mix NavigationLink(value:) with manually changing NavigationPath, it stops working with no error. If you only use links, you're good, if you only change the NavigationPath you're good. Mixing doesn't work. No error in the console either, the breakpoints hit .navigationDestination and the view is returned, but never piled up. (Further attempts do show the NavigationPath is being changed properly, but views aren't changing) This problem didn't happen when just staying on NavigationStack without a NavigationSplitView. Why mix? There's a few reasons to do so. NavigationLinks put the appropriate disclosure indicator (can't replicate its look 100% without it), while NavigationPaths let you trigger navigation without user input (.onChange, etc) Any insights here? I'd put some code samples but there's a metric ton of options I've tested here.

Why is the pitch slider always visible in the SwiftUI tvOS map view? It doesn't even appear to be supported there, let alone the fact that I specify mapControlVisibility(.hidden). Am I missing something or is Apple? See attached screenshot. This really messes up my UI. Here is my code: import SwiftUI import MapKit struct ContentView: View { @State var position = MapCameraPosition.region(MKCoordinateRegion( center: CLLocationCoordinate2D(latitude: 37.7749, longitude: -122.4194), span: MKCoordinateSpan(latitudeDelta: 0.05, longitudeDelta: 0.05))) var body: some View { Map(position: $position) .mapControlVisibility(.hidden) .mapStyle(.standard(pointsOfInterest: .including(.airport))) } }

We have SwiftUI AttributedString with links. But these links are inaccessible via automation scripts. The text is visible to the automation scripts as XCUIElementTypeStaticText and there is no provision to access the links within. Is there any workaround available for this case ?

How do I draw a single line of text in a SwiftUI Canvas, scaled to fill a given rectangle? Example: Canvas { context, size in let r = CGRect(origin: CGPointZero, size: size); // Whole canvas let t = Text("Hello World"); context.draw(t, in: r); } Outside of Canvas I'd add .minimumScaleFactor(0) .lineLimit(1), and I guess set a large default font size, and I'd get the result I want. But inside Canvas, .minimumScaleFactor and .lineLimit don't seem to be available; they return some View, not Text, which can't be used in context.draw. (Is there a trick to make that work?) I have written the following to do this, but I think there must be an easier way to achieve this! Suggestions? extension GraphicsContext { mutating func draw_text_in_rect(string: String, rect: CGRect) { let text = Text(string) .font(.system(size: 25)); // The font size used here does matter, because e.g. letter spacing // varies with the font size. let resolved = resolve(text); let text_size = resolved.measure(in: CGSize(width: CGFloat.infinity, height: CGFloat.infinity)); let text_aspect = text_size.width / text_size.height; let fit_size = CGSize(width: min(rect.size.width, rect.size.height*text_aspect), height: min(rect.size.height, rect.size.width/text_aspect)); let fit_rect = CGRect(x: rect.origin.x + (rect.size.width-fit_size.width)/2, y: rect.origin.y + (rect.size.height-fit_size.height)/2, width: fit_size.width, height: fit_size.height); let scale = fit_size.width / text_size.width; // For debug: // var p = Path(); // p.addRect(fit_rect); // stroke(p, with: GraphicsContext.Shading.color(.red), lineWidth: 1); translateBy(x: fit_rect.minX, y: fit_rect.minY); scaleBy(x:scale, y:scale); draw(resolved, at: CGPointZero, anchor: UnitPoint.topLeading); transform = CGAffineTransformIdentity; } };