I'm unable to sign in to Feedback Assistant on macOS. I have two Apple accounts and neither will sign in. I am able to sign in via the website. With the desktop app I'm getting a rather generic error message:
"Unable to sign in to Feedback Assistant
Thank you for your patience. Please try again later."
This started this morning.
General
RSS for tagDive into the vast array of tools and services available to developers.
Selecting any option will automatically load the page
Post
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
I used to develop iPhone apps about a decade ago and am now back at it with an iPhone and companion Apple Watch app.
Why does it suck so bad? I a must be doing something wrong, but what I am doing is out of the box. The majority of the time when I go to build on the watch I get:
Previous preparation error: A connection to this device could not be established.; Timed out while attempting to establish tunnel using negotiated network parameters.
Which I then first try to force quit the app on the watch and if that does not work, reboot the watch (which is pretty ridiculous).
I tried Gemini and it gave me the following explanation:
This is arguably the single most frustrating error in the entire watchOS development ecosystem. As an expert, I can tell you that you are not doing anything wrong; you are fighting a fragile architecture.
Here is the technical breakdown of why this happens and a workflow to mitigate it without constant reboots.
The Technical "Why"
This error message reveals that the issue lies in the CoreDevice (and formerly usbmuxd) infrastructure, specifically in the secure transport layer.
The "Tunnel" Failure: Xcode attempts to establish a secure, encrypted tunnel (DTXConnection) to the Apple Watch to push the debugger and the app binary. Unlike the iPhone, which can sustain a high-bandwidth connection easily, the Watch aggressively manages its radios (Bluetooth vs. WiFi vs. AWDL) to save battery.
The "Handshake" Timeout: If the Watch is on Bluetooth (Low Energy) when Xcode initiates the tunnel, the bandwidth is insufficient. The system tries to escalate the connection to WiFi (or Apple Wireless Direct Link). If this negotiation takes even a few milliseconds too long—due to 2.4GHz interference, router mDNS configuration, or the Watch CPU being throttled—the handshake times out.
The "Previous Preparation Error": This is the insidious part. Once the handshake fails once, Xcode’s device service caches that failure state for the device UUID. It marks the device as "unreachable" to prevent the IDE from hanging indefinitely on subsequent tries.
Why you see it constantly: You aren't actually triggering a new connection attempt; you are hitting the cached "failed" state immediately.
Unfortunately, the solutions it gives me are:
The "Wired Proxy" Method (Most Reliable)
This is the gold standard for watchOS debugging. Do not rely on "Connect via Network" for the Watch directly if you can avoid it.
Disable WiFi on your Mac (temporarily) or ensure the Mac and iPhone are on the exact same SSID.
Plug your iPhone into the Mac via USB.
Ensure the Watch is paired to that iPhone.
Result: Xcode will tunnel the instructions through the USB connection to the Phone, and the Phone acts as a high-bandwidth proxy to the Watch. This eliminates the "Mac-to-Watch" WiFi negotiation failure point.
Do you hit this regularly? What do you do to make for a smooth development and deployment process? Or is it really this fragile?
Thanks for any help!
Bryan
Simply opening Simulator app (26.0) causes high CPU usage on macOS Tahoe (26.1).
ReportCrash process usage is very high throughout and causes the system to heat up pretty soon.
Looking into Console app for the logs found MercuryPosterExtension process is keep on crashing. (Check under Crash Reports)
simctl Diagnose
https://download.developer.apple.com/OS_X/OS_X_Logs/simctl_Diagnose_Logging_Instructions.pdf
Share the Simulator Diagnose report while reporting, Thanks.
I have raised a ticket/feedback with Apple. I request all of you to raise one too so this gets fixed soon.
Apple Feedback Assistant - FB20985249
For example, what if I wanted to remove CoreData from the SDK when I install to reduce the SDK’s size?
After the Update of Latest Command Line Tools 16.3 I am facing issue to compile C++ programs. Like it is giving some kind of library error in the MACOSX15.sdk file and this is the error.
In file included from /Library/Developer/CommandLineTools/SDKs/MacOSX15.sdk/usr/include/mach/machine/_structs.h:35,
from /Library/Developer/CommandLineTools/SDKs/MacOSX15.sdk/usr/include/arm/_mcontext.h:36,
from /Library/Developer/CommandLineTools/SDKs/MacOSX15.sdk/usr/include/machine/_mcontext.h:34,
from /Library/Developer/CommandLineTools/SDKs/MacOSX15.sdk/usr/include/sys/signal.h:146,
from /Library/Developer/CommandLineTools/SDKs/MacOSX15.sdk/usr/include/sys/wait.h:109,
from /Library/Developer/CommandLineTools/SDKs/MacOSX15.sdk/usr/include/_stdlib.h:70,
from /Library/Developer/CommandLineTools/SDKs/MacOSX15.sdk/usr/include/stdlib.h:58,
from /opt/homebrew/Cellar/gcc/14.2.0_1/include/c++/14/cstdlib:79,
from /opt/homebrew/Cellar/gcc/14.2.0_1/include/c++/14/stdlib.h:36,
from /Library/Developer/CommandLineTools/SDKs/MacOSX15.sdk/usr/include/assert.h:44,
from /opt/homebrew/Cellar/gcc/14.2.0_1/include/c++/14/cassert:44,
from /opt/homebrew/Cellar/gcc/14.2.0_1/include/c++/14/aarch64-apple-darwin24/bits/stdc++.h:33,
from 1.cpp:1:
/Library/Developer/CommandLineTools/SDKs/MacOSX15.sdk/usr/include/mach/arm/_structs.h:627:35: error: expected primary-expression before 'unsigned'
627 | } __attribute__((aligned(_Alignof(unsigned int))));
| ^~~~~~~~
/Library/Developer/CommandLineTools/SDKs/MacOSX15.sdk/usr/include/mach/arm/_structs.h:627:26: error: '_Alignof' was not declared in this scope
627 | } __attribute__((aligned(_Alignof(unsigned int))));
| ^~~~~~~~
/Library/Developer/CommandLineTools/SDKs/MacOSX15.sdk/usr/include/mach/arm/_structs.h:633:35: error: expected primary-expression before 'unsigned'
633 | } __attribute__((aligned(_Alignof(unsigned int))));
| ^~~~~~~~
/Library/Developer/CommandLineTools/SDKs/MacOSX15.sdk/usr/include/mach/arm/_structs.h:633:26: error: '_Alignof' was not declared in this scope
633 | } __attribute__((aligned(_Alignof(unsigned int))));
| ^~~~~~~~
/Library/Developer/CommandLineTools/SDKs/MacOSX15.sdk/usr/include/mach/arm/_structs.h:639:35: error: expected primary-expression before 'unsigned'
639 | } __attribute__((aligned(_Alignof(unsigned int))));
| ^~~~~~~~
/Library/Developer/CommandLineTools/SDKs/MacOSX15.sdk/usr/include/mach/arm/_structs.h:639:26: error: '_Alignof' was not declared in this scope
639 | } __attribute__((aligned(_Alignof(unsigned int))));
| ^~~~~~~~
/Library/Developer/CommandLineTools/SDKs/MacOSX15.sdk/usr/include/mach/arm/_structs.h:645:35: error: expected primary-expression before 'unsigned'
645 | } __attribute__((aligned(_Alignof(unsigned int))));
| ^~~~~~~~
/Library/Developer/CommandLineTools/SDKs/MacOSX15.sdk/usr/include/mach/arm/_structs.h:645:26: error: '_Alignof' was not declared in this scope
645 | } __attribute__((aligned(_Alignof(unsigned int))));
But after downgrading the version to 16.2 it works fine. I can't understand that it's their any issue with Command Line Tools 16.3??
Just recently, any pkg file that I create with pkgbuild will install the Payload's application as a zero-byte file in the /Applications directory. This has been working for years without issue for me.
Here are the commands I am using with company specific items replaced:
pkgbuild --analyze --root MyApplicationRootDirectory standalone.plist
plutil -replace BundleIsRelocatable -bool NO standalone.plist
pkgbuild --identifier MyIdentifier --version 1.0 --install-location /Applications --root MyApplicationRootDirectory --component-plist standalone.plist --sign 'Developer ID Installer: MyCompany (MySignId)' --timestamp installer.pkg
Any ideas on what could be causing the issue?
I have verified the following:
The application being added to the pkg is both signed and notarized using the correct Developer ID Application certificate.
The resultant pkg file is both signed and notarized using the Developer ID Installer certificate.
Verified the pkg contents using "pkgutil --expand" to dump the contents.
Verified the pkg's Payload contents by extracting the data using "cat Payload | gunzip | cpio -1". This results in an application file that is a binary match for file added in the "pkgbuild --root" argument.
My application is the only file within the directory passed to the "pkgbuild --root" argument.
There are no warnings in the System Settings / Privacy & Security Panel when running the package installer.
I have a valid Mac Developer account.
I am building the application and the pkg file on the same computer.
Thank you for any insight.
I'm trying to download the iOS 26 restore image for my iPhone 14 Pro Max, which is my test device. However, when I attempted to install it directly via the over-the-air (OTA) update, the iPhone rebooted to the iOS 26 "Welcome" screen, but with no touch functionality—the screen was completely unresponsive.
I restored the device back to iOS 18.5 and tried the OTA update again, but once more, the touch screen stopped working upon completion.
Now, I am trying to download the iOS 26 restore image from the official developer page (https://developer.apple.com/download/#ios-restore-images-ipad-new) to install it manually using my Mac. However, I've run into a problem with the download links:
The link for the iPhone 14 Pro Max (iOS 26) restore image actually downloads the iPhone 14 Pro (iOS 18.5) image.
Conversely, the link for the iPhone 14 Pro seems to provide the correct iPhone 14 Pro Max (iOS 26) image.
The issue is that when I try to restore my iPhone using this seemingly correct file, I receive an error that the firmware file is not valid or compatible. I suspect it's not being properly signed by Apple for my device during the restore process.
Does anyone have the correct, official download link for the iOS 26 restore image for the iPhone 14 Pro Max? How can I fix these errors?
We are developing a Flutter application targeted for MacOS and Windows . We are using the FlutterMacOS and connectivity_plus packages in our app
But whenever we are releasing a version to App Store we are getting the privacy manifest file missing for above 2 packages
We tried to add xcPrivacy file inside the Runner Xcode project. But that doesn't solve the issue
Adding the relevant lines from the warning email getting from App Store below
"ITMS-91061: Missing privacy manifest - Your app includes “Contents/Frameworks/FlutterMacOS.framework/Versions/A/FlutterMacOS”, which includes Flutter, an SDK that was identified in the documentation as a commonly used third-party SDK. Starting February 12, 2025, if a new app includes a commonly used third-party SDK, or an app update adds a new commonly used third-party SDK, the SDK must include a privacy manifest file or you won’t be able to submit the app for review in App Store Connect. Please contact the provider of the SDK that includes this file to get an updated SDK version with a privacy manifest. For more details about this policy, including a list of SDKs that are required to include signatures and manifests, visit: https://developer.apple.com/support/third-party-SDK-requirements.
ITMS-91061: Missing privacy manifest - Your app includes “Contents/Frameworks/connectivity_plus.framework/Versions/A/connectivity_plus”, which includes connectivity_plus, an SDK that was identified in the documentation as a commonly used third-party SDK. Starting February 12, 2025, if a new app includes a commonly used third-party SDK, or an app update adds a new commonly used third-party SDK, the SDK must include a privacy manifest file or you won’t be able to submit the app for review in App Store Connect. Please contact the provider of the SDK that includes this file to get an updated SDK version with a privacy manifest. For more details about this policy, including a list of SDKs that are required to include signatures and manifests, visit: https://developer.apple.com/support/third-party-SDK-requirements."
Please suggest a solution to solve this issue as early as possible , because February 12th onwards we will get blocked to release new versions
Hello, I am experiencing crash on TopShelf and I checked all the crashlogs, but I don't know how to interpret it.
I see only addresses in the trace logs, so it's really hard to understand what's going on. Is there a way how to symbolicate frames 5 - 17?
Does anybody have an idea, what can be wrong?
Thanks in advance.
0 libswiftCore.dylib 0x000000019bd33a88 _assertionFailure(_:_:file:line:flags:) + 264 (AssertCommon.swift:147)
1 TopShelf 0x00000001048b998c 0x1045ac000 + 3201420
2 TopShelf 0x0000000104cc04a8 0x1045ac000 + 7423144
3 libdispatch.dylib 0x000000019ab89294 _dispatch_client_callout + 20 (object.m:576)
4 libdispatch.dylib 0x000000019ab8aae0 _dispatch_once_callout + 32 (once.c:52)
5 TopShelf 0x00000001048f4098 0x1045ac000 + 3440792
6 TopShelf 0x00000001048f4930 0x1045ac000 + 3442992
7 TopShelf 0x00000001048cc8bc 0x1045ac000 + 3279036
8 TopShelf 0x00000001045b5a61 0x1045ac000 + 39521
9 TopShelf 0x0000000104ca8841 0x1045ac000 + 7325761
10 TopShelf 0x00000001049e5cc5 0x1045ac000 + 4431045
11 TopShelf 0x0000000104cc0dfd 0x1045ac000 + 7425533
12 TopShelf 0x00000001045b4b95 0x1045ac000 + 35733
13 TopShelf 0x00000001045b4e81 0x1045ac000 + 36481
14 TopShelf 0x00000001045b50e5 0x1045ac000 + 37093
15 TopShelf 0x00000001045b5a61 0x1045ac000 + 39521
16 TopShelf 0x00000001045b54b5 0x1045ac000 + 38069
17 TopShelf 0x00000001045b50e5 0x1045ac000 + 37093
18 libswift_Concurrency.dylib 0x000000019c30aedd completeTaskWithClosure(swift::AsyncContext*, swift::SwiftError*) + 1 (Task.cpp:497)
Up to now I've been building my x64 binaries on Sequioa specifying a target macOS level of 13.4. That worked fine.
In an attempt to debug a problem that was causing some pain I created a 13.4 x64 build environment and tried to build the code there.
This code:
using CacheKeyType = std::filesystem::path;
using CacheValueType = std::tuple<LoadedImage, int, bool>; // <image, lastUse, currentlyLoading>
using CacheType = std::unordered_map<CacheKeyType, CacheValueType>;
friend class ThreadLoader;
static inline constexpr int16_t MAXIMAGESINCACHE = 20;
static inline constinit std::atomic_int age{ 0 };
static inline std::shared_mutex rwMutex{};
static inline CacheType imageCache{};
got me the following errors:
/Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Platforms/MacOSX.platform/Developer/SDKs/MacOSX13.3.sdk/usr/include/c++/v1/__hash_table:838:5: error: static_assert failed due to requirement 'integral_constant<bool, false>::value' "the specified hash does not meet the Hash requirements"
static_assert(__check_hash_requirements<_Key, _Hash>::value,
^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Platforms/MacOSX.platform/Developer/SDKs/MacOSX13.3.sdk/usr/include/c++/v1/__hash_table:853:1: note: in instantiation of template class 'std::__enforce_unordered_container_requirements<std::filesystem::path, std::hash<std::filesystem::path>, std::equal_to<std::filesystem::path>>' requested here
typename __enforce_unordered_container_requirements<_Key, _Hash, _Equal>::type
^
/Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Platforms/MacOSX.platform/Developer/SDKs/MacOSX13.3.sdk/usr/include/c++/v1/unordered_map:1152:30: note: while substituting explicitly-specified template arguments into function template '__diagnose_unordered_container_requirements'
static_assert(sizeof(__diagnose_unordered_container_requirements<_Key, _Hash, _Pred>(0)), "");
^
/Users/amonra/.vs/DSS/build/DeepSkyStackerKernel/DeepSkyStackerKernel_autogen/EWIEGA46WW/../../../../DeepSkyStackerKernel/imageloader.h:60:26: note: in instantiation of member function 'std::unordered_map<std::filesystem::path, std::tuple<LoadedImage, int, bool>>::~unordered_map' requested here
static inline CacheType imageCache{};
^
2 errors generated.
Which isn't "mega-helpful" :(
I thought that specifying:
set(CMAKE_OSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET 13.4 CACHE STRING "Minimum operating system version for deployment" FORCE)
would have made the compilations use the same headers as for Ventura above, but it seems not?
Is this to be expected?
Topic:
Developer Tools & Services
SubTopic:
General
I have an Xcode project setup as follows:
3 static libraries
1 framework target, whose Mach-O type is set to Dynamic Library
main app target (iOS app)
The target dependencies are as follows:
In framework's build phase [Link with libraries], I have the 3 libs statically linked.
In the main app's build phase [Link with libraries], I have only the framework, which is dynamically linked.
As per my understanding:
The libs are statically linked to the framework. So, the framework binary would contain code from all the libs.
The framework is dynamically linked to the main app (iOS app in this case). So, the main app's binary only has a reference to the framework's binary, which would be loaded in the memory at runtime.
Assuming my understanding is correct, I'm stuck with the following problem:
All 3 libs build successfully
The framework builds successfully
The main app target doesn't build. The compilation is successful, but the build fails with linker errors.
Please let me know if I am doing something incorrectly, or if a configuration is missing. Below are more details:
The linker gives the following error:
Undefined symbols for architecture arm64:
"StringUtils.GetStr() -> Swift.String", referenced from:
dynamic_fw.AppDelegate.application(_: __C.UIApplication, didFinishLaunchingWithOptions: [__C.UIApplicationLaunchOptionsKey : Any]?) -> Swift.Bool in AppDelegate.o
"TWUtils.GetNum() -> Swift.Int", referenced from:
dynamic_fw.AppDelegate.application(_: __C.UIApplication, didFinishLaunchingWithOptions: [__C.UIApplicationLaunchOptionsKey : Any]?) -> Swift.Bool in AppDelegate.o
ld: symbol(s) not found for architecture arm64
clang: error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see invocation)
And the command shown in the logs for linking phase is:
Ld /Users/raunit.shrivastava/Library/Developer/Xcode/DerivedData/dynamic-fw-foqtqhpopkmoapfufzxbfloamnpr/Build/Products/Debug-iphonesimulator/dynamic-fw.app/dynamic-fw normal (in target 'dynamic-fw' from project 'dynamic-fw')
cd /Users/raunit.shrivastava/Desktop/dynamic-fw
/Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Toolchains/XcodeDefault.xctoolchain/usr/bin/clang -Xlinker -reproducible -target arm64-apple-ios17.5-simulator -isysroot /Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Platforms/iPhoneSimulator.platform/Developer/SDKs/iPhoneSimulator17.5.sdk -O0 -L/Users/raunit.shrivastava/Library/Developer/Xcode/DerivedData/dynamic-fw-foqtqhpopkmoapfufzxbfloamnpr/Build/Intermediates.noindex/EagerLinkingTBDs/Debug-iphonesimulator -L/Users/raunit.shrivastava/Library/Developer/Xcode/DerivedData/dynamic-fw-foqtqhpopkmoapfufzxbfloamnpr/Build/Products/Debug-iphonesimulator -L. -L./StringUtils -L./TWFramework -L./TWUtils -L./dynamic-fw -F/Users/raunit.shrivastava/Library/Developer/Xcode/DerivedData/dynamic-fw-foqtqhpopkmoapfufzxbfloamnpr/Build/Intermediates.noindex/EagerLinkingTBDs/Debug-iphonesimulator -F/Users/raunit.shrivastava/Library/Developer/Xcode/DerivedData/dynamic-fw-foqtqhpopkmoapfufzxbfloamnpr/Build/Products/Debug-iphonesimulator -F. -F./StringUtils -F./TWFramework -F./TWUtils -F./dynamic-fw -filelist /Users/raunit.shrivastava/Library/Developer/Xcode/DerivedData/dynamic-fw-foqtqhpopkmoapfufzxbfloamnpr/Build/Intermediates.noindex/dynamic-fw.build/Debug-iphonesimulator/dynamic-fw.build/Objects-normal/arm64/dynamic-fw.LinkFileList -Xlinker -rpath -Xlinker @executable_path/Frameworks -Xlinker -rpath -Xlinker ./\*\* -dead_strip -Xlinker -object_path_lto -Xlinker /Users/raunit.shrivastava/Library/Developer/Xcode/DerivedData/dynamic-fw-foqtqhpopkmoapfufzxbfloamnpr/Build/Intermediates.noindex/dynamic-fw.build/Debug-iphonesimulator/dynamic-fw.build/Objects-normal/arm64/dynamic-fw_lto.o -Xlinker -export_dynamic -Xlinker -no_deduplicate -Xlinker -objc_abi_version -Xlinker 2 -fobjc-link-runtime -L/Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Toolchains/XcodeDefault.xctoolchain/usr/lib/swift/iphonesimulator -L/usr/lib/swift -Xlinker -add_ast_path -Xlinker /Users/raunit.shrivastava/Library/Developer/Xcode/DerivedData/dynamic-fw-foqtqhpopkmoapfufzxbfloamnpr/Build/Intermediates.noindex/dynamic-fw.build/Debug-iphonesimulator/dynamic-fw.build/Objects-normal/arm64/dynamic_fw.swiftmodule -Xlinker -sectcreate -Xlinker __TEXT -Xlinker __entitlements -Xlinker /Users/raunit.shrivastava/Library/Developer/Xcode/DerivedData/dynamic-fw-foqtqhpopkmoapfufzxbfloamnpr/Build/Intermediates.noindex/dynamic-fw.build/Debug-iphonesimulator/dynamic-fw.build/dynamic-fw.app-Simulated.xcent -Xlinker -sectcreate -Xlinker __TEXT -Xlinker __ents_der -Xlinker /Users/raunit.shrivastava/Library/Developer/Xcode/DerivedData/dynamic-fw-foqtqhpopkmoapfufzxbfloamnpr/Build/Intermediates.noindex/dynamic-fw.build/Debug-iphonesimulator/dynamic-fw.build/dynamic-fw.app-Simulated.xcent.der -framework TWFramework -Xlinker -no_adhoc_codesign -Xlinker -dependency_info -Xlinker /Users/raunit.shrivastava/Library/Developer/Xcode/DerivedData/dynamic-fw-foqtqhpopkmoapfufzxbfloamnpr/Build/Intermediates.noindex/dynamic-fw.build/Debug-iphonesimulator/dynamic-fw.build/Objects-normal/arm64/dynamic-fw_dependency_info.dat -o /Users/raunit.shrivastava/Library/Developer/Xcode/DerivedData/dynamic-fw-foqtqhpopkmoapfufzxbfloamnpr/Build/Products/Debug-iphonesimulator/dynamic-fw.app/dynamic-fw
I have created and Ios app using xojo, and run using the Xcode simulator. I want to test it on my phone and don't seed to put it on the app store as it is for personal use. I've seen pages that indicate a free apple developer option is available for a limited time but can't for the live of me get my app to actually run on my phone. I've tried both apple configurator and xcode to add my app with no luck
hey I accidentally deleted my info.plist with holds my app version and other critical things and I don't know how to get it back or how to recode it
Topic:
Developer Tools & Services
SubTopic:
General
Hello,
I'm checking to see if anyone else is experiencing an issue downloading the latest beta simulator.
When I try to download the iOS 26 beta 5 simulator in Xcode, the download fails instantly. There is no progress, just an immediate error with no message other than the code itself: DVTDownloadableErrorDomain Code: 41.
I've already restarted both Xcode and the Mac multiple times. I have also tried downloading on different networks to rule out a firewall issue.
Xcode 16.2
Flutter version 3.27.1
0 0x1008abee4 __assert_rtn + 160
1 0x1008add9c ld::tool::OutputFile::setFixup64(unsigned char*, unsigned long long, ld::Atom const*) (.cold.3) + 0
2 0x100789640 ld::tool::OutputFile::setFixup64(unsigned char*, unsigned long long, ld::Atom const*) + 656
3 0x100785b78 ld::tool::OutputFile::applyFixUps(ld::Internal&, unsigned long long, ld::Atom const*, unsigned char*) + 4388
4 0x10078be18 ___ZN2ld4tool10OutputFile10writeAtomsERNS_8InternalEPh_block_invoke + 488
5 0x19bc19428 _dispatch_client_callout2 + 20
6 0x19bc2d850 _dispatch_apply_invoke3 + 336
7 0x19bc193e8 _dispatch_client_callout + 20
8 0x19bc1ac68 _dispatch_once_callout + 32
9 0x19bc2c8a4 _dispatch_apply_invoke + 252
10 0x19bc193e8 _dispatch_client_callout + 20
11 0x19bc2b080 _dispatch_root_queue_drain + 864
12 0x19bc2b6b8 _dispatch_worker_thread2 + 156
13 0x19bdc5fd0 _pthread_wqthread + 228
A linker snapshot was created at:
/tmp/Test Kopi Kenangan.debug.dylib-2025-02-27-100512.ld-snapshot
ld: Assertion failed: (reconstituted == accumulator), function setFixup64, file OutputFile.cpp, line 2975.
clang: error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see invocation)
I've been messing around with converting my app icons to use Icon Composer. My app has multiple app icons, but I've noticed that I cant seem to set .icon files using the alternate app icon api. I believe this is due to the requirement that alternate app icons live in the Assets Catalogue but .icon files go anywhere in your project. Is there any plan to support this? Or am i missing something?
I was able to successfully set a .icon file for the primary app icon.
I just noticed that when you check the online documentation for Foundation using the delicious Objective-C flavor, some values are no more the expected ones:
https://developer.apple.com/documentation/foundation/filemanager/copyitem(at:to:)?language=objc#return-value
true if the item was copied successfully or the file manager’s delegate stopped the operation deliberately. Returns false if an error occurred.
Considering that a BOOL used to be YES or NO for the last quarter of a century, I have the following question:
[Q] What is the idea behind the disturbing changes of the Objective-C documentation?
I have one iOS device running iOS 16.7.10. When I run xcrun devicectl list devices I can't see that device at all. Is that know limitation (devicectl only work in iOS 17 and above) or is something wrong with my setup.
Also is there some documention about devicectl. I can't seem to find anything about in the offical apple sites.
Topic:
Developer Tools & Services
SubTopic:
General
Hi everyone,
We’re testing the new iOS 26 capability, Performing Fast Account Creation with Passkeys, using the sample project provided here: Performing Fast Account Creation with Passkeys.
When running the project on the iOS 26 simulator and tapping the "Sign Up" button, we encounter the following error:
The operation couldn’t be completed. (com.apple.AuthenticationServices.AuthorizationError error 1010.)
From the header file, this error is described as:
/// ASAuthorizationError.h
/// This error signals that the device is not currently set up to create passkeys.
ASAuthorizationErrorDeviceNotConfiguredForPasskeyCreation AS_API_AVAILABLE(ios(19.0), macos(16.0), visionos(3.0)) = 1010,
We’ve tested this on both Xcode 26 Beta 1 and Beta 2, and the error persists on the simulator in both versions.
However, when testing on a physical iOS 26 device, everything works as expected, just like in the WWDC demo.
Could this issue be related to missing simulator settings? Or is it a potential bug in the simulator? Any advice would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks in advance!
We have universal links which takes user to various journeys in the app when user clicks on the link, however it works only when app is installed. If app is not installed link takes user to the App Store and when the user installs and opens the app, the link does not launch the intended deeplink flow.
Is there any way we can pass context to app store and receive it when user opens the app?
Android provides similar functionality using install referral lib. Checking if similar is possible in iOS.