Hi We are modifying the official Wi‑Fi Aware sample app to integrate QUIC for transmission speed testing. Unfortunately, we have been unable to establish a successful QUIC connection between two iOS devices. Could you provide a correct implementation example of using QUIC over Wi‑Fi Aware? I have attached the iOS system logs and our modified app project for your reference in case FB22499984 . Thanks

I've just implemented background session downloads, and in testing (with 1044 downloadTasks), I'm seeing some strange behavior that's not 100% reproducible. Sometimes when I background the app, when I foreground it (or the OS does), the URLSessionDownloadDelegate's function urlSession(_:downloadTask:didFinishDownloadingTo:) gets called twice. I'm also logging the URLSessionTaskDelegate's function urlSession(_:task:didCompleteWithError:) and in this case, it does not get called between calls to didFinishDownloadingTo. Both cases are being called with the exactly same task, session and location. The first call copies the location to a semi-permanent destination (and I confirmed that file is correct), and the second call fails on move because the destination already exists. I can obviously work around this fairly easily, but wondering if I'm missing something or if there's a bug. It does appear to happen more reliably when I background for 15 seconds or longer. A second issue which is reproducible is that while backgrounded, some files are completing downloads and never calling the download delegate's urlSession(_:downloadTask:didWriteData:totalBytesWritten:totalBytesExpectedToWrite:) I tried resuming one or all of the tasks in applicationDidBecomeActive as suggested in multiple other forums posts, but neither of those seems to resolve the issue. Again, I can work around this (using a combination of totalBytesWritten and the known size of files which have completed downloads), but I'm wondering if I'm missing something obvious. I actually thought that perhaps the resume() workaround was causing the first issue, but removing it does not have an effect.

I've managed to put together a WebSocket client in Swift using NWProtocolWebSocket (though the documentation does not make it easy.) The point I'm stuck on is how to get a meaningful error if the server rejects the HTTP request, for example with a 404 or 403 status. The error reported to my stateUpdateHandler is a low-level POSIXErrorCode(rawValue: 53): Software caused connection abort). Additionally, how can I add custom headers to the HTTP request, like authorization or cookies? (I'm kind of wondering whether good ol' NSURLSession would have been a better choice -- TN3151 says: "Unless you have a specific reason to use URLSession, use Network framework for new WebSocket code", but at this point I feel that's bad advice.)

After an app update replaces our extension with the new version, the XPC connection between the app and the extension fails to work roughly 20% of the time. Once it's broken, it stays broken — our reconnect/retry logic doesn't recover it, stopping and starting the extension doesn't recover it, and the only thing that fixes it is a full machine restart. This obviously isn't ideal. I've seen a few other threads describing the same or a very similar issue: https://developer.apple.com/forums/thread/728063 https://developer.apple.com/forums/thread/779395 https://developer.apple.com/forums/thread/742992 On a broken upgrade cycle, when we run: sudo launchctl print system/NetworkExtension.com.company.example.app.filter.5.5.0.2248 the endpoints entry is missing from the output entirely. On a working upgrade cycle, the same command shows endpoints = {} is present. So it looks like our XPC service isn't actually getting registered with launchd in the broken case. We've tried various changes to our connection logic, but nothing prevents the issue — random upgrades still end up broken with no obvious cause. Is there a known way to recover the XPC registration without requiring a machine restart?

Hello, I am experiencing a specific authorization error on macOS Tahoe when trying to discover all available service types on the local network. While the implementation works perfectly on iOS and macOS Sonoma, it fails on Tahoe with a specific error code. The Issue When calling DNSServiceBrowse with the meta-query string _services._dns-sd._udp, the function immediately returns kDNSServiceErr_NoAuth (-65555). // This call fails on macOS Tahoe DNSServiceErrorType err = DNSServiceBrowse( &ref, 0, kDNSServiceInterfaceIndexAny, "_services._dns-sd._udp", // Meta-query for all services domc, probe_browse_reply, (__bridge void *)self ); Important Findings & Observations Specific Services Work: If I change the service type to a specific one (e.g., _http._tcp or _ssh._tcp) using NWBrowser, it works correctly and returns results. The error only occurs when browsing for _services._dns-sd._udp using DNSServiceBrowse. Local Network Permission: I have confirmed that the Local Network toggle is ON for my app in System Settings > Privacy & Security > Local Network. Entitlements: My app has the com.apple.developer.networking.multicast entitlement. Info.plist: Both NSLocalNetworkUsageDescription and NSBonjourServices (including _services._dns-sd._udp) are properly configured. Sandbox: The issue persists regardless of whether the App Sandbox is enabled (with incoming/outgoing connections) or disabled. Environment Not Working OS: macOS Tahoe 26 Working OS: macOS Sonoma, iOS 26 Question It seems macOS Tahoe has introduced a stricter policy regarding Network Reconnaissance or meta-service browsing. Is there a new requirement or a specific entitlement needed in macOS Tahoe to browse for _services._dns-sd._udp? Any guidance on how to restore this functionality for network utility apps on macOS Tahoe would be greatly appreciated. Best regards.

Our app has a network extension (as I've mentioned lots 😄). We do an upgrade by downloading the new package, stopping & removing all of our components except for the network extension, and then installing the new package, which then loads a LaunchAgent causing the containing app to run. (The only difference between a new install and upgrade is the old extension is left running, but not having anything to tell it what to do, just logs and continues.) On some (but not all) upgrades... nothing ends up able to communicate via XPC with the Network Extension. My simplest cli program to talk to it gets Could not create proxy: Error Domain=NSCocoaErrorDomain Code=4099 "The connection to service named blah was invalidated: failed at lookup with error 3 - No such process." UserInfo={NSDebugDescription=The connection to service named bla was invalidated: failed at lookup with error 3 - No such process.} Could not communicate with blah Restarting the extension by doing a kill -9 doesn't fix it; neither does restarting the control daemon. The only solution we've come across so far is rebooting. I filed FB11086599 about this, but has anyone thoughts about this?

We have a Man In The Middle proxy that supports all kind of protocols (http, tls, dns, mail protocols, grpc, etc...)... On apple devices we are running it using the Network Extension framework as a NETransparentProxy. First of all, thank you for the framework, took a while to learn the ins and outs but it works nicely and runs smooth... However now that we start to roll it out to customers we see issues here and there.. For most it works fine, but for some that use other proxy/vpn solutions they run into all kind of "connectivity" issues... E.g. some customers run products from companies like zscaler, fortinet, tailscale etc... First we weren't sure if you could even run multiple TransparentProxy's that have the same network capture rules (e.g. the entire TCP range), but turns out that is fine as we tested it with a demo proxy of ours as well as the product version, both deployed as system extensions NETransparentProxy, and it is all fine.. However also here the ordering is not clear? Traffic seems to flow through both but cannot tell what the order is and if the user or we have any control over it. Now... Our proxy is not a VPN and thus not open a tunnel to a remote location. It is local only there to protect the developer. As such in theory it should be compatible with any other VPN and proxy as any traffic we intercept (all traffic) is still ok to go through their proxy/client-vpn and than through a remote tunnel if desired. So the questions I have is: Is there a way, either from within the code or that our users can configure to, on the order of multiple (network extension or other) proxies? Is TransparentProxy the correct solution if I also want compatibility with these other products and want to MITM the traffic? The flows that current work fine are: ClientApp --> NETransparentProxy[ours] --> remote target server clientApp --> L7 HTTP/SOCKS5 Proxy (system or app-defined) --> NETransparentProxy[ours] --> remote target server clientApp --> L7 HTTP/SOCKS5 Proxy (system or app-defined) --> NETransparentProxy[ours/demo] --> NETransparentProxy[demo/ours] --> remote target server However when people also have products from zscaler, fortinet, tailscale or some others it seems to work sometimes but not always, which makes me think it is order defined? What all of them have in common is that they need to go through a remote tunnel, whereas we do not go through a remote tunnel... Which if I am correct (perhaps I am not) should mean that as long as traffic always goes first via us that it should work? e.g. clientApp --> NETransparentProxy[ours] --> NETransparentProxy/Tunnel/...[third party vpn] --> Vpn Server --> remote target server That should in that case just work. But it does not work in case we are behind the (vpn proxy) client. Please let me know if I provide enough detail and if I'm clear? I am mostly wondering about what I can expect in terms of compatibility if there is anything I (or our company user) can do about ordering/priority/something ?

Hi. I have a private cryptographic key that I want to generate and store for use by the system extension only (a network extension NETransparentProxyProvider). The ideal properties I want is: only accessible by extension never leave extension not be accessible by root user or other apps Here is what I have tried so far (by/within the system extension): app data container / local storage: this works, but is accessible by root user app data shared container (storage): this works, but also acccessible by root user system keyring: works, but also accesible by root user System extension by itself does not seem to be able to store/load secrets in app protected keyring. The host application however can store in app protected keyring.... So I though, let's use an app group (as access group) and have it like this shared between host and (system) extension... but nop... (system) extension cannot access the secret... Ok... so than I thought: manual low-level XPC calls.... Also that doesn't work, got something almost to work but seemed to require an entire 3rd (launchd/daemon) service.... way to complex for what I want... also seems that as a root user I can use debug tools to also access it There is however the SendMessage/HandleMessage thing available for TransparentProxy.... that does work... but (1) also doesn't seem the most secure (2) the docs clearly state cannot rely on that for this state as the system extension can be started while the host app is not active.... (e.g. at startup) So that is not a solution either.... I went in so many different directions and rabbit holes in the last days.... this feels like a lot harder than it should be? How do other VPN/Proxy like solutions store secrets that are unique to an extension???? I am hoping there is something available here that I am simply missing despite all my effort... any guidance greatly appreciated...

Hi All, I am working on a macOS System Extension using Apple’s Network Extension Framework, designed to observe and log network activity at multiple layers. The system extension is currently stable and working as expected for HTTP and DNS traffic with 3 providers, getting Socket, HTTP, and DNS logs. Current Architecture Overview The project consists of two Xcode targets: 1. Main App Process Responsible for: Managing system extension lifecycle (activation, configuration) Establishing IPC (XPC) communication with extensions Receiving structured logs from extensions Writing logs efficiently to disk using a persistent file handle Uses: OSSystemExtensionManager NEFilterManager, NETransparentProxyManager, NEDNSProxyManager NWPathMonitor for network availability handling Persistent logging mechanism (FileHandle) 2. System Extension Process Contains three providers, all running within a single system extension process: a) Content Filter (NEFilterDataProvider) Captures socket-level metadata Extracts: PID via audit token Local/remote endpoints Protocol (TCP/UDP, IPv4/IPv6) Direction (inbound/outbound) Sends structured JSON logs via shared IPC b) Transparent Proxy (NETransparentProxyProvider) Intercepts TCP flows Creates a corresponding NWConnection to the destination Captures both HTTP and HTTPS traffic, sends it to HTTPFlowLogger file which bypasses if it's not HTTP traffic. Uses a custom HTTPFlowLogger: Built using SwiftNIO library (NIO HTTP1) Parses up to HTTP/1.1 traffic Handles streaming, headers, and partial body capture (with size limits) Maintains per-flow state and lifecycle management Logs structured HTTP data via shared IPC c) DNS Proxy (NEDNSProxyProvider) Intercepts UDP DNS traffic Forwards queries to upstream resolver (system DNS or fallback) Maintains shared UDP connection Tracks pending requests using DNS IDs Parses DNS packets (queries + responses) using a custom parser Logs structured DNS metadata via shared IPC Shared Component: IPCConnection Single bidirectional XPC channel used by all providers Handles: App → Extension registration Extension → App logging Uses Mach service defined in system extension entitlements Project Structure NetworkExtension (Project) │ ├── NetworkExtension (Target 1: Main App) │ ├── AppDelegate.swift │ ├── Assets.xcassets │ ├── Info.plist │ ├── NetworkExtension.entitlements │ ├── Main.storyboard │ └──ViewController.swift │ ├── SystemExtensions (Target 2: Extension Process) │ ├── common/ │ │ ├── IPCConnection.swift │ │ └── main.swift │ │ │ ├── DNSProxyProvider/ │ │ ├──DNSDataParser.swift │ │ └──DNSProxyProvider.swift (DNS Proxy) │ │ │ ├── FilterDataProvider/ │ │ └── FilterDataProvider.swift │ │ │ ├── TransparentProxyProvider/ │ │ ├── HTTPLogParser.swift │ │ ├── LogDataModel.swift │ │ └──TransparentProxyProvider.swift │ │ │ ├── Info.plist │ └── SystemExtensions.entitlements │ Current Capabilities Unified logging pipeline across: Socket-level metadata HTTP traffic (HTTP/1.1) DNS queries/responses Efficient log handling using persistent file descriptors Stable IPC communication between app and extensions Flow-level tracking and lifecycle management Selective filtering (e.g., bypass rules for specific IPs) What's the best approach to add TLS Inspection with MITM proxy setup? Some context and constraints: Existing implementation handles HTTP parsing and should remain unchanged (Swift-based). I’m okay with bypassing apps/sites that use certificate pinning (e.g., banking apps) and legitimate sites. Performance is important — I want to avoid high CPU utilization. I’m relatively new to TLS inspection and MITM proxy design. Questions Is it a good idea to implement TLS inspection within a system extension, or does that typically introduce significant complexity and performance overhead? As NETransparentProxyProvider already intercepting HTTPS traffic, can we redirect it to a separate processing pipeline (e.g., another file/module), while keeping the existing HTTP parser(HTTPFlowLogger - HTTP only parser) intact? What are the recommended architectural approaches for adding HTTPS parsing via MITM in a performant way? Are there best practices for selectively bypassing pinned or sensitive domains while still inspecting other traffic? Any guidance on avoiding common pitfalls (e.g., certificate handling, connection reuse, latency issues)? I’m looking for a clean, maintainable approach to integrate HTTPS inspection into my existing system without unnecessary complexity or performance degradation. Please let me know if any additional details from my side would help in suggesting the most appropriate approach. Thanks in advance for your time and insights—I really appreciate it.

Our business interface requests require disabling HTTP(s) proxies. We configured URLSessionConfiguration.connectionProxyDictionary as before, but found that it does not work on iOS 26 1.Core code: let configuration = URLSessionConfiguration.default configuration.connectionProxyDictionary = [ "HTTPEnable": false, "HTTPSEnable": false, "SOCKSEnable": false, ] let session = URLSession(configuration: configuration) let request = URLRequest(url: URL(string: "https://www.baidu.com")!,timeoutInterval: Double.infinity) // 发送请求 let task = session.dataTask(with: request) { data, response, error in if let error = error { print("网络请求失败: \(error)") } if let data = data { print("网络请求成功，返回数据长度: \(data.count)") if let responseString = String(data: data, encoding: .utf8) { print("返回数据: \(responseString.prefix(100))...") } } } task.resume() 2.Specific steps: We captured traffic using Proxyman and Charles. With the same code, requests cannot be captured on iOS 18 and iOS 16.1, but can be captured on iOS 26.2 and 26.1. Conclusion:Therefore, we suspect there is a bug with URLSessionConfiguration.connectionProxyDictionary on iOS 26.x. Please let us know whether this is a bug. If not, how should we properly disable HTTP(s) proxies? Note: We need to exclude PAC proxies, which are commonly used in corporate internal networks. 3.Devices & Software Xcode 16.4 iPhone 26.2、Simulator 26.1 iPhone 16、Simulator 18.0、Simulator 18.6 Proxyman、Charles

Hello Apple Support Team, We are experiencing a performance issue with HTTP/3 in our iOS application during testing. Problem Description: Network requests using HTTP/3 are significantly slower than expected. This issue occurs on both Wi-Fi and 4G networks, with both IPv4 and IPv6. The same setup worked correctly in an earlier experiment. Key Observations: The slowdown disappears when the device uses: · A personal hotspot. · Network Link Conditioner (with no limitations applied). · Internet sharing from a MacBook via USB (where traffic was also inspected with Wireshark without issues). The problem is specific to HTTP/3 and does not occur with HTTP/2. The issue is reproducible on iOS 15, 18.7, and the latest iOS 26 beta. HTTP/3 is confirmed to be active (via assumeHttp3Capable and Alt-Svc header). Crucially, the same backend endpoint works with normal performance on Android devices and using curl with HTTP/3 support from the same network. I've checked the CFNetwork logs in the Console but haven't found any suspicious errors or obvious clues that explain the slowdown. We are using a standard URLSession with basic configuration. Attempted to collect qlog diagnostics by setting the QUIC_LOG_DIRECTORY=~/ tmp environment variable, but the logs were not generated. Question: What could cause HTTP/3 performance to improve only when the device is connected through a hotspot, unrestricted Network Link Conditioner, or USB-tethered connection? The fact that Android and curl work correctly points to an issue specific to the iOS network stack. Are there known conditions or policies (e.g., related to network interface handling, QoS, or specific packet processing) that could lead to this behavior? Additionally, why might the qlog environment variable fail to produce logs, and are there other ways to obtain detailed HTTP/3 diagnostic information from iOS? Any guidance on further diagnostic steps or specific system logs to examine would be greatly appreciated. Thank you for your assistance.

Our business interface requests require disabling HTTP(s) proxies. We configured URLSessionConfiguration.connectionProxyDictionary as before, but found that it does not work on iOS 16.2 and 16.3.1. 1.Core code: let configuration = URLSessionConfiguration.default configuration.connectionProxyDictionary = [ "HTTPEnable": false, "HTTPSEnable": false, "SOCKSEnable": false, ] let session = URLSession(configuration: configuration) let request = URLRequest(url: URL(string: "https://www.baidu.com")!,timeoutInterval: Double.infinity) // 发送请求 let task = session.dataTask(with: request) { data, response, error in if let error = error { print("网络请求失败: \(error)") } if let data = data { print("网络请求成功，返回数据长度: \(data.count)") if let responseString = String(data: data, encoding: .utf8) { print("返回数据: \(responseString.prefix(100))...") } } } task.resume() 2.Specific steps: We captured traffic using Proxyman and Charles. With the same code, requests cannot be captured on iOS 18 and iOS 16.1, but can be captured on iOS 26.2 and 26.1. Conclusion:Therefore, we suspect there is a bug with URLSessionConfiguration.connectionProxyDictionary on iOS 26.x. Please let us know whether this is a bug. If not, how should we properly disable HTTP(s) proxies? Note: We need to exclude PAC proxies, which are commonly used in corporate internal networks. 3.Devices & Soft Xcode 16.4 iPhone 26.2、Simulator 26.1 Proxyman、Charles

We use TeamCity as our Continuous Integration (CI) solution to build and run automated tests. These are integration tests executed through our 4D application, which is properly code‑signed and notarized. These CI machines are heavily used and build multiple versions per day, making them critical to our development workflow. However, we are experiencing an issue on some machines: after a certain period of time, network communication through our application stops working, while network communication remains fully functional when using third‑party tools (for example, LDAP clients). Based on our investigation, this issue appears to be related to Local Network Privacy management. We have followed the procedure described in Apple’s Technical Note: TN3179: Understanding local network privacy | Apple Developer Documentation to reset network authorizations, but this has not been sufficient to resolve the issue. In addition, our CI environment requires acknowledging a large number of Local Network access permission prompts. Given that these machines build multiple versions per day and are intended to run unattended, this is not practical in an automated CI context. We have around ten Macs dedicated to running these tests, and manually approving these pop‑ups is not a viable solution.

https://developer.apple.com/documentation/corewlan/cweventtype/linkqualitydidchange As per the documentation core WLAN will send notification when there is a change in RSSI. I did not receive any notification when there is a change in RSSI.

Hello, I have an app that is using iOS 26 Network Framework APIs. It is using QUIC, TLS 1.3 and Bonjour. For TLS I am using a PKCS#12 identity. All works well and as expected if the devices (iPhone with no cellular, iPhone with cellular, and iPad no cellular) are all on the same wifi network. If I turn off my router (ie no more wifi network) and leave on the wifi toggle on the iOS devices - only the non cellular iPhone and iPad are able to discovery and connect to each other. My iPhone with cellular is not able to. By sharing my logs with Cursor AI it was determined that the connection between the two problematic peers (iPad with no cellular and iPhone with cellular) never even makes it to the TLS step because I never see the logs where I print out the certs I compare. I tried doing "builder.requiredInterfaceType(.wifi)" but doing that blocked the two non cellular devices from working. I also tried "builder.prohibitedInterfaceTypes([.cellular])" but that also did not work. Is AWDL on it's way out? Should I focus my energy on Wi-Fi Aware? Regards, Captadoh

While going through the documentation for NWConnection, there seems to be state known as .waiting which means that the connection is waiting for a path change. For TCP, the state is understandable and can occur under some scenarios. But for the case of UDP, I have following queries: Why do we need .waiting state for the case of UDP? Even if we do need .waiting state for UDP, when all does this state occurs?

Here’s the formatted summary in English for your issue submission: Issue Summary We are activating a Network Extension system extension (filter-data) from a signed and notarized macOS app. Activation consistently fails with the following error: Error Message: OSSystemExtensionErrorDomain code=4 Extension not found in App bundle. Unable to find any matched extension with identifier: com.seaskylight.yksmacos.ExamNetFilter.data At the same time, sysextd logs show: no policy, cannot allow apps outside /Applications However, our host app and executable paths are already under /Applications, and the extension bundle physically exists in the expected app bundle location. Environment Information macOS: Darwin 25.4.0 Host App: /Applications/xxx.app Host Bundle ID: com.seaskylight.yksmacos System Extension Bundle ID: com.seaskylight.yksmacos.ExamNetFilter.data Team ID: BVU65MZFLK Device Management: Enrolled via DEP: No MDM Enrollment: No Reproduction Steps Install the host app to /Applications. Launch the host app via Finder or using the command: open -a "/Applications/xxx.app" Trigger OSSystemExtensionRequest activationRequestForExtension for: com.seaskylight.yksmacos.ExamNetFilter.data. Observe failure callback (code=4). Collect logs: log show --last 2m --style compact --info --debug --predicate 'process == "sysextd"' Check extension status using: systemextensionsctl list (shows 0 extension(s)) Observed Results sysextd client activation request for com.seaskylight.yksmacos.ExamNetFilter.data attempts to realize extension with identifier com.seaskylight.yksmacos.ExamNetFilter.data. Log indicates: no policy, cannot allow apps outside /Applications App-side Diagnostics (captured at failure) PID: 3249 Bundle Path: /Applications/xxx.app Real Path: /Applications/xxx.app Exec Path: /Applications/xxx.app/Contents/MacOS/xxx Real Exec Path: /Applications/xxx.app/Contents/MacOS/xxx Ext Path: /Applications/xxx.app/Contents/Library/SystemExtensions/ExamNetFilterData.systemextension Ext Exists: true Running From Helper: false Error Callback: NSError{domain=OSSystemExtensionErrorDomain code=4 desc=Extension not found in App bundle...} Additional Validation We reproduced the same failure using a minimal native host app (SysExtProbe) in /Applications that only submits the activation request for the same extension identifier. It also fails with OSSystemExtensionErrorDomain code=4, indicating this is not specific to Electron app logic. Signing / Packaging Notes Host app and system extension are signed with the same Team ID (BVU65MZFLK). System extension bundle exists under: /Applications/xxx.app/Contents/Library/SystemExtensions/ExamNetFilterData.systemextension Extension Info.plist contains bundle id: com.seaskylight.yksmacos.ExamNetFilter.data Host app includes NSSystemExtensionUsageDescription. Questions for DTS In non-MDM personal-device scenarios, what exact conditions trigger sysextd to emit: no policy, cannot allow apps outside /Applications even when both bundlePath and realpath are in /Applications? Can code=4 (“Extension not found in App bundle”) be returned for policy/state reasons even when the extension bundle is present and the identifier matches? Are there known sysextd policy/cache states that cause this behavior, and what is the recommended recovery procedure? Feel free to copy and paste this summary for your submission. If you need any further modifications or assistance, let me know!

Hello team, I am trying to find out a way to block urls in the chrome browser if it is found in local blocked list cache. I found URL Filter Network very much suitable for my requirement. But I see at multiple places that this solution is only for Enterprise level or MDM or supervised device. So can I run this for normal user ? as my targeting audience would be bank users. One more thing how can I test this in development environment if we need supervised devices and do we need special entitlement ? When trying to run sample project in the simulator then getting below error

Hello, I am currently developing a PIR server using the pir-server-example repository. We are anticipating a total of 10 million URLs for our dataset. In this context, what would be the optimal shard size (number of records per shard) to balance computational latency and communication overhead? Any advice or best practices for handling a dataset of this scale would be greatly appreciated. Thank you.

We've received several reports of a new bug while setting up our products with WAC. The Accessory Setup UI appears with a blank network selected and the message 'This accessory will be set up to join "(null)".' at top. The user can tap "Show Other Networks..." to select another network, but this experience is very confusing. Why does this UI present a choice that is known to be invalid when other valid choices exist? I've captured a screenshot and sysdiagnose from this case. In most cases this problem happens only intermittently, but I can reproduce it consistently by disconnecting my iPhone from any WiFi network (WiFi remains enabled). My suggestion for a better user experience is that this UI should select the default network according to these rules: The network to which iPhone is currently connected. Any network which is in the known/my list for this iPhone Any valid network I believe rule #1 is the existing behavior, but applying rules #2 and #3 as fallbacks would be an improvement. Is there anything I can change in my iOS code or in my accessory's WAC server to improve this experience?