Hello, I have a few questions regarding URL Filter (iOS 26) and Content Filter Providers. URL Filter According to the WWDC26 video, URL Filter appears to be available for both consumer and enterprise deployments. This seems consistent with the classic Network Extension Provider Deployment documentation (TN3134 – August 2025), where no specific deployment restriction is mentioned. However, a more recent document (Apple Platform Deployment, September 2025) indicates the following for URL Filter: “Requires supervision on iPhone, iPad and Mac” (with a green checkmark). 👉 My question: Is URL Filter actually available for consumer use on non-supervised iPhones (deployed on Testflight and AppStore), or is supervision now required? Content Filter Providers From past experience, I remember that Content Filter Providers were only available on supervised devices. Based on the current documentation, I am questioning their usability in a consumer context, i.e. on non-supervised iPhones. In the Network Extension Provider Deployment documentation, it is stated that this is a Network Extension and that, since iOS 16, it is a “per-app on managed device” restriction. In the more recent Apple Platform Deployment document, it states for iPhone and iPad: “App needs to be installed on the user’s iOS and iPadOS device and deletion can be prevented if the device is supervised.” 👉 My understanding: Supervised device: The Content Filter Provider is installed via a host application that controls enabling/disabling the filter, and the host app can be prevented from being removed thanks to supervision. Non-supervised device: The Content Filter Provider is also installed via a host application that controls enabling/disabling the filter, but the app can be removed by the user, which would remove the filter. 👉 My question: Can Content Filter Providers be used in a consumer context on non-supervised iPhones (deployed on Testflight and AppStore), accepting that the user can uninstall the host app (and therefore remove the filter)? Thank you in advance for your feedback. Sources: TN3134 => TN3134: Network Extension provider deployment | Apple Developer Documentation Apple Platform Deployment / Filter content for Apple devices => https://support.apple.com/en-gb/guide/deployment/dep1129ff8d2/1/web/1.0

We've received several reports of a new bug while setting up our products with WAC. The Accessory Setup UI appears with a blank network selected and the message 'This accessory will be set up to join "(null)".' at top. The user can tap "Show Other Networks..." to select another network, but this experience is very confusing. Why does this UI present a choice that is known to be invalid when other valid choices exist? I've captured a screenshot and sysdiagnose from this case. In most cases this problem happens only intermittently, but I can reproduce it consistently by disconnecting my iPhone from any WiFi network (WiFi remains enabled). My suggestion for a better user experience is that this UI should select the default network according to these rules: The network to which iPhone is currently connected. Any network which is in the known/my list for this iPhone Any valid network I believe rule #1 is the existing behavior, but applying rules #2 and #3 as fallbacks would be an improvement. Is there anything I can change in my iOS code or in my accessory's WAC server to improve this experience?

My application (using a nested framework for networking) was working correctly on iPadOS 18, but failed to perform a UDP broadcast operation after upgrading the device to iPadOS 26. The low-level console logs consistently show a "Permission denied" error. Symptoms & Error Message: When attempting to send a UDP broadcast packet using NWConnection (or a similar low-level socket call within the framework), the connection fails immediately with the following error logged in the console: nw_socket_service_writes_block_invoke [C2:1] sendmsg(fd 6, 124 bytes) [13: Permission denied] (Error code 13 corresponds to EACCES). Verification Steps (What I have checked): Multicast Networking Entitlement is Approved and Applied: The necessary entitlement (com.apple.developer.networking.multicast) was granted by Apple. The Provisioning Profile used for signing the Host App Target has been regenerated and explicitly includes "Multicast Networking" capability (see attached screenshot). I confirmed that Entitlements cannot be added directly to the Framework Target, only the Host App Target, which is the expected behavior. Local Network Privacy is Configured: The Host App's Info.plist contains the NSLocalNetworkUsageDescription key with a clear usage string. Crucially, the Local Network Access alert does not reliably appear when the Broadcast function is first called (despite a full reinstall after OS upgrade). Even when Local Network Access is manually enabled in Settings, the Broadcast still fails with EACCES. Code Implementation: The Broadcast is attempted using NWConnection to the host 255.255.255.255 on a specific port. Request: Since all required entitlements and profiles are correct, and the failure is a low-level EACCES on a newly updated OS version, I suspect this may be a regression bug in the iPadOS 26 security sandbox when validating the Multicast Networking Entitlement against a low-level socket call (like sendmsg). Has anyone else encountered this specific Permission denied error on iPadOS 26 with a valid Multicast Entitlement, and is there a known workaround aside from switching to mDNS/Bonjour?

Hello eveybody,Currently I'm working on an app which connects to a device. During testing I encounter an internal error of NEHotspotConfigurationErrorDomain. See the log snippet:Domain=NEHotspotConfigurationErrorDomain Code=8 "internal error." UserInfo={NSLocalizedDescription=internal error.}This error appears randomly. In one day I encountered it three times. The only solution I can think of is catching this error somehow and then telling the user to restart the device.After this error appears, the wifi functionality of iOS in all third party apps seems to be broken. Only restarting helps as far as I know. Also there seems to be nothing we as app developers can do about it. Therefor I wonder if there is some way to prevent this error somehow? The only solution I can think of is catching this error somehow and then telling the user to restart the device.Also since there is not much information about this error on the web, it would be really nice if someone can clarify whats going on with this error.Regards.

Hello and Good day! We are conducting Bonjour Conformance Test (BCT) for Printer device. BCT result is PASSED but with warning in Multicast DNS, specifically, WARNING: SHARED REPLY TIMING - UNIFORM RANDOM REPLY TIME DISTRIBUTION Other Shared Reply Timing is passed: PASSED: MULTIPLE QUESTIONS - SHARED REPLY TIMING - UNIFORM RANDOM REPLY TIME DISTRIBUTION Environment: BCT Tool Version: 1.5.4 (15400) MacOS Sequioa 15.5 DUT Firmware : Linux Debian 9 Apple mDNSResponder 1790.80.10 Service types: _ipps._tcp, _uscans._tcp, _ipp._tcp, _uscan._tcp Router : NEC AtermWR8370N Setup: 1-to-1 [Mac->Router<-DUT connection] Based on debug.log, this is where WARNING occurs: NOTICE 2026-03-04 10:51:06.870187+0900 _shared_reply_timing 04103: Shared reply response times: min = 26ms, max = 114ms, avg = 65.50ms WARNING 2026-03-04 10:51:06.870361+0900 _shared_reply_timing 04136: 50 percent of the replies within the correct range fell in the interval 20ms and 46ms (should be close to 25%). PASSED (SHARED REPLY TIMING) In the same debug.log for MULTIPLE QUESTIONS - SHARED REPLY TIMING is PASSED: NOTICE 2026-03-04 10:52:29.912334+0900 _shared_reply_timing 04103: Shared reply response times: min = 22ms, max = 112ms, avg = 78.00ms DEBUG_2 2026-03-04 10:52:29.912849+0900 recv_packet 01997: received packet (558 bytes) PASSED (MULTIPLE QUESTIONS - SHARED REPLY TIMING) [Details] Looking at Bonjour_Conformance_Guideline.pdf https://download.developer.apple.com/Documentation/Bonjour_Conformance_Test_Guideline/Bonjour_Conformance_Guideline.pdf there were some differences: In 1.6.2 Expected Result: Test Result File of Test that All Tests Passed, this is not displayed: PASSED: SHARED REPLY TIMING - UNIFORM RANDOM REPLY TIME DISTRIBUTION And in II.8 Shared Reply Timing: (Ideally, 25% of the answers should fall in each 21ms quadrant of the range 20ms - 125ms.) and comparing to the debug.log, there was a discrepancy of the interval, because 20ms and 46ms is 26ms interval. From RFC6762 6. Responding, Ideal range is from 20ms-120ms Because of this, please advise on the questions below: I would like to know on the possible cause and resolution for these WARNINGS. And since in current BCT result, (Test result integrity signature is generated), I would like to know if this is acceptable for BCT certification. Thank you.

Hi, Our project is a MacOS SwiftUI GUI application that bundles a (Sandboxed) System Network Extension, signed with a Developer ID certificate for distribution outside of the app store. The system network extension is used to write a packet tunnel provider (NEPacketTunnelProvider), as our project requires the creation of a TUN device. In order for our System VPN to function, it must reach out to a (self-hosted) server (i.e. to discover a list of peers). Being self-hosted, this server is typically not accessible via the public web, and may only be accessible from within a VPN (such as those also implemented using NEPacketTunnelProvider, e.g. Tailscale, Cloudflare WARP). What we've discovered is that the networking code of the System Network Extension process does not attempt to use the other VPN network interfaces (utunX) on the system. In practice, this means requests to IPs and hostnames that should be routed to those interfaces time out. Identical requests made outside of the Network System Extension process use those interfaces and succeed. The simplest example is where we create a URLSession.downloadTask for a resource on the server. A more complicated example is where we execute a Go .dylib that continues to communicate with that server. Both types of requests time out. Two noteworthy logs appear when packets fail to send, both from the kernel 'process': cfil_hash_entry_log:6088 <CFIL: Error: sosend_reinject() failed>: [30685 com.coder.Coder-Desktop.VPN] <UDP(17) out so b795d11aca7c26bf 57728068503033955 57728068503033955 age 0> lport 3001 fport 3001 laddr 100.108.7.40 faddr 100.112.177.88 hash 58B15863 cfil_service_inject_queue:4472 CFIL: sosend() failed 49 I also wrote some test code that probes using a UDP NWConnection and NWPath availableInterfaces. When run from the GUI App, multiple interfaces are returned, including the one that routes the address, utun5. When ran from within the sysex, only en0 is returned. I understand routing a VPN through another is unconventional, but we unfortunately do need this functionality one way or another. Is there any way to modify which interfaces are exposed to the sysex? Additionally, are these limitations of networking within a Network System Extension documented anywhere? Do you have any ideas why this specific limitation might exist?

Hi, I’m implementing a macOS DNS Proxy as a system extension and running into a persistent activation error: OSSystemExtensionErrorDomain error 9 (validationFailed) with the message: extension category returned error This happens both on an MDM‑managed Mac and on a completely clean Mac (no MDM, fresh install). Setup macOS: 15.x (clean machine, no MDM) Xcode: 16.x Team ID: AAAAAAA111 (test) Host app bundle ID: com.example.agent.NetShieldProxy DNS Proxy system extension bundle ID: com.example.agent.NetShieldProxy.dnsProxy The DNS Proxy is implemented as a NetworkExtension system extension, not an app extension. Host app entitlements From codesign -d --entitlements :- /Applications/NetShieldProxy.app: xml com.apple.application-identifier AAAAAAA111.com.example.agent.NetShieldProxy <key>com.apple.developer.system-extension.install</key> <true/> <key>com.apple.developer.team-identifier</key> <string>AAAAAAA111</string> <key>com.apple.security.app-sandbox</key> <true/> <key>com.apple.security.application-groups</key> <array> <string>group.com.example.NetShieldmac</string> </array> <key>com.apple.security.files.user-selected.read-only</key> <true/> xml com.apple.application-identifier AAAAAAA111.com.example.agent.NetShieldProxy.dnsProxy <key>com.apple.developer.networking.networkextension</key> <array> <string>dns-proxy-systemextension</string> </array> <key>com.apple.developer.team-identifier</key> <string>AAAAAAA111</string> <key>com.apple.security.application-groups</key> <array> <string>group.com.example.NetShieldmac</string> <string>group.example.NetShieldmac</string> <string>group.example.agent.enterprise.macos</string> <string>group.example.com.NetShieldmac</string> </array> DNS Proxy system extension Info.plist On the clean Mac, from: bash plutil -p "/Applications/NetShieldProxy.app/Contents/Library/SystemExtensions/com.example.agent.NetShieldProxy.dnsProxy.systemextension/Contents/Info.plist" I get: json { "CFBundleExecutable" => "com.example.agent.NetShieldProxy.dnsProxy", "CFBundleIdentifier" => "com.example.agent.NetShieldProxy.dnsProxy", "CFBundleName" => "com.example.agent.NetShieldProxy.dnsProxy", "CFBundlePackageType" => "SYSX", "CFBundleShortVersionString" => "1.0.1.8", "CFBundleSupportedPlatforms" => [ "MacOSX" ], "CFBundleVersion" => "0.1.1", "LSMinimumSystemVersion" => "13.5", "NSExtension" => { "NSExtensionPointIdentifier" => "com.apple.dns-proxy", "NSExtensionPrincipalClass" => "com_example_agent_NetShieldProxy_dnsProxy.DNSProxyProvider" }, "NSSystemExtensionUsageDescription" => "SYSTEM_EXTENSION_USAGE_DESCRIPTION" } The DNSProxyProvider class inherits from NEDNSProxyProvider and is built in the system extension target. Activation code In the host app, I use: swift import SystemExtensions final class SystemExtensionActivator: NSObject, OSSystemExtensionRequestDelegate { private let extensionIdentifier = "com.example.agent.NetShieldProxy.dnsProxy" func activate(completion: @escaping (Bool) -> Void) { let request = OSSystemExtensionRequest.activationRequest( forExtensionWithIdentifier: extensionIdentifier, queue: .main ) request.delegate = self OSSystemExtensionManager.shared.submitRequest(request) } func request(_ request: OSSystemExtensionRequest, didFailWithError error: Error) { let nsError = error as NSError print("Activation failed:", nsError) } func request(_ request: OSSystemExtensionRequest, didFinishWithResult result: OSSystemExtensionRequest.Result) { print("Result:", result.rawValue) } } Runtime behavior on a clean Mac (no MDM) config.plist is created under /Library/Application Support/NetShield (via a root shell script). A daemon runs, contacts our backend, and writes /Library/Application Support/NetShield/state.plist with a valid dnsToken and other fields. The app NetShieldProxy.app is installed via a notarized, stapled Developer ID .pkg. The extension bundle is present at: /Applications/NetShieldProxy.app/Contents/Library/SystemExtensions/com.example.agent.NetShieldProxy.dnsProxy.systemextension. When I press Activate DNS Proxy in the UI, I see in the unified log: text NetShieldProxy: [com.example.agent:SystemExtensionActivator] Requesting activation for system extension: com.example.agent.NetShieldProxy.dnsProxy NetShieldProxy: [com.example.agent:SystemExtensionActivator] SystemExtensionActivator - activation failed: extension category returned error (domain=OSSystemExtensionErrorDomain code=9) NetShieldProxy: [com.example.agent:SystemExtensionActivator] SystemExtensionActivator - OSSystemExtensionError code enum: 9 NetShieldProxy: [com.example.agent:SystemExtensionActivator] SystemExtensionActivator - validationFailed And: bash systemextensionsctl list -> 0 extension(s) There is no prompt in Privacy & Security on this clean Mac. Question Given: The extension is packaged as a system extension (CFBundlePackageType = SYSX) with NSExtensionPointIdentifier = "com.apple.dns-proxy". Host and extension share the same Team ID and Developer ID Application cert. Entitlements on the target machine match the provisioning profile and Apple’s docs for DNS Proxy system extensions (dns-proxy-systemextension). This is happening on a clean Mac with no MDM profiles at all. What are the likely reasons for OSSystemExtensionErrorDomain error 9 (validationFailed) with "extension category returned error" in this DNS Proxy system extension scenario? Is there any additional configuration required for DNS Proxy system extensions (beyond entitlements and Info.plist) that could trigger this category-level validation failure? Any guidance or examples of a working DNS Proxy system extension configuration (host entitlements + extension Info.plist + entitlements) would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!

I am facing an intermittent problem where iPhones are failing to pair/connect with Xcode under Xcode -> Windows -> Devices and Simulators. This happens when more than one web content filters are present, for instance, I have my web content filter (FilterSockets true, FilterGrade Firewall) and there is also Sentinel One web content filter with same configuration. Note: We are not blocking any flow from remoted / remotepairingd / core device service / MDRemoteServiceSupport etc processes. But they do get paused and resumed at times for our internal traffic verification logic. So, we are trying to understand what impact our content filter may be having on this iPhone Pairing?? If we stop either one of the filters the problem goes away. I have tracked the network traffic to the phone, and it seems to be using a ethernet interface (en5/en10) over the USB-C cable. I can see endpoints like this: localEndpoint = fe80::7:afff:fea1:edb8%en5.54442 remoteEndpoint = fe80::7:afff:fea1:ed47%en5.49813 I also see remoted process has the below ports open : sudo lsof -nP -iTCP -iUDP | grep remoted remoted 376 root 4u IPv6 0xce4a89bddba37bce 0t0 TCP [fe80:15::7:afff:fea1:edb8]:57395->[fe80:15::7:afff:fea1:ed47]:58783 (ESTABLISHED) remoted 376 root 6u IPv6 0xf20811f6922613c7 0t0 TCP [fe80:15::7:afff:fea1:edb8]:57396 (LISTEN) remoted 376 root 7u IPv6 0x2c393a52251fcc56 0t0 TCP [fe80:15::7:afff:fea1:edb8]:57397 (LISTEN) remoted 376 root 8u IPv6 0xcb9c311b0ec1d6a0 0t0 TCP [fd6e:8a96:a57d::2]:57398 (LISTEN) remoted 376 root 9u IPv6 0xc582859e0623fe4e 0t0 TCP [fd6e:8a96:a57d::2]:57399 (LISTEN) remoted 376 root 10u IPv6 0x2f7d9cee24a44c5b 0t0 TCP [fd6e:8a96:a57d::2]:57400->[fd6e:8a96:a57d::1]:60448 (ESTABLISHED) remoted 376 root 11u IPv6 0xbdb7003643659de 0t0 TCP [fd07:2e7e:2a83::2]:57419 (LISTEN) remoted 376 root 12u IPv6 0x569a5b649ff8f957 0t0 TCP [fd07:2e7e:2a83::2]:57420 (LISTEN) remoted 376 root 13u IPv6 0xa034657978a7da29 0t0 TCP [fd07:2e7e:2a83::2]:57421->[fd07:2e7e:2a83::1]:61729 (ESTABLISHED) But due to the dynamic nature of port and IPs used we are not able to decide on an effective early bypass NEFilterRule. We don't want to use a very broad bypass criteria like all link local IPs etc. Any help will be greatly appreciated.

Greetings.I have an app today that uses multipeer connectivity extensively. Currently, when the user switches away from the app, MPC disconnects the session(s) - this is by design apparently (per other feedback). I'd like to hear if anyone has experimented with iOS9 multitasking / multipeer and whether MPC sessions can stay alive?Thanks

I have a custom VPN app that uses NETunnelProviderManager to install a VPN Profile if one is not already installed. On previous iOS versions this would open the VPN Settings and ask for either the PIN, FaceID or TouchID and install the profile. With iOS 26 beta5 it opens the VPN Settings and stops. Is this a bug in iOS 26? Have there been changes to NETunnelProviderManager for iOS 26 that I'm not aware of? FYI we do the samething on macOS 26 beta5 and that works as expected.

According to documentation, the URLSession background tasks continue even when the app is suspended. What is the lifespan of the URLSessionDownloadDelegate object when app is suspended or terminated? Will it get re-created and re-initialize properties when the app re-launches, or will it somehow restore the existing property values? Also, urlSessionDidFinishEvents not getting called, and what do we need to do there with the backgroundCompletionHandler? Any insights are much appreciated. We are getting ready to launch and this is a roadblock. (visionOS26.4) Thank you. @Observable class DownloadManager: NSObject, URLSessionDownloadDelegate { ... let config = URLSessionConfiguration.background(withIdentifier: "TestDL") config.sessionSendsLaunchEvents = true var urlSession = URLSession(configuration: config, delegate: self, delegateQueue: nil) func downloadFiles(... { // initiate multiple file downloads concurrently for url in urlList { let task = urlSession.downloadTask(with: url) task.resume() } } func urlSession(_ session: URLSession, downloadTask: URLSessionDownloadTask, didFinishDownloadingTo location: URL) { ... func urlSession(_ session: URLSession, downloadTask: URLSessionDownloadTask, didWriteData bytesWritten: Int64, totalBytesWritten: Int64, totalBytesExpectedToWrite: Int64) { ... func urlSession(_: URLSession, task: URLSessionTask, didCompleteWithError error: Error?) { ... // Not getting called ?? // Is this only called when app is suspended/terminated? func urlSessionDidFinishEvents(forBackgroundURLSession session: URLSession) { print("didFinishEvents") Task { @MainActor in //urlSession?.finishTasksAndInvalidate() //urlSession = nil // not sure what to do here: if let appDelegate = UIApplication.shared.delegate as? AppDelegate, let completionHandler = appDelegate.backgroundCompletionHandler { completionHandler() appDelegate.backgroundCompletionHandler = nil } } }

Howdy, I've been developing a packet tunnel extension meant to run on iOS and MacOS. For development I'm using xcodegen + xcodebuild to assemble a bunch of swift and rust code together. I'm moving from direct TUN device management on Mac to shipping a Network Extension (appex). With that move I noticed that on some mac laptops NE fails to start completely, whilst on others everything works fine. I'm using CODE_SIGN_STYLE: Automatic, Apple IDs are within the same team, all devices are registered as dev devices. Signing dev certificates, managed by xcode. Some suspicious logs: (NetworkExtension) [com.apple.networkextension:] Signature check failed: code failed to satisfy specified code requirement(s) ... (NetworkExtension) [com.apple.networkextension:] Provider is not signed with a Developer ID certificate What could be the issue? Where those inconsistencies across devices might come from?

https://developer.apple.com/documentation/corewlan/cweventtype/linkqualitydidchange As per the documentation core WLAN will send notification when there is a change in RSSI. I did not receive any notification when there is a change in RSSI.

Hello, I am investigating a recurring crash that appears to be originating within the system's network stack. OS Version: iPhone OS 26.1 (23B85) Role: Foreground Exception Type: EXC_BAD_ACCESS (SIGSEGV) Exception Subtype: KERN_INVALID_ADDRESS at 0x0000000000000000 Exception Codes: 0x0000000000000001, 0x0000000000000000 Triggered by Thread: 19 Description: The crash is triggered by Thread 19 and occurs deep within libquic.dylib during a QUIC recovery timer event. Based on the backtrace, the failure happens in quic_recovery_pto. The issue seems to occur when a protocol instance schedules a wakeup, leading to a null pointer dereference in the system library. Crashed Thread Backtrace snippet:Thread 19 Crashed: Thread 19 Crashed: 0 libquic.dylib 0x00000001a00a38cc quic_recovery_pto + 72 (quic_recovery.c:1259) 1 libquic.dylib 0x00000001a00a3390 quic_recovery_timer_fired + 132 (quic_recovery.c:1460) 2 libquic.dylib 0x00000001a00a1f8c quic_timer_run + 248 (quic_timer.c:210) 3 Network 0x000000018ec76cbc __nw_protocol_instance_schedule_wakeup_block_invoke + 76 (protocol_implementation.cpp:5847) 4 Network 0x000000018eba34e0 __nw_context_reset_timer_block_with_time_block_invoke + 268 (context.cpp:2224) 5 libdispatch.dylib 0x00000001c84727ec _dispatch_client_callout + 16 (client_callout.mm:85) 6 libdispatch.dylib 0x00000001c845d664 _dispatch_continuation_pop + 596 (queue.c:349) 7 libdispatch.dylib 0x00000001c8470528 _dispatch_source_latch_and_call + 396 (source.c:601) 8 libdispatch.dylib 0x00000001c846f1fc _dispatch_source_invoke + 844 (source.c:966) 9 libdispatch.dylib 0x00000001c8463288 _dispatch_workloop_invoke + 1612 (queue.c:4761) 10 libdispatch.dylib 0x00000001c846c3ec _dispatch_root_queue_drain_deferred_wlh + 292 (queue.c:7265) 11 libdispatch.dylib 0x00000001c846bce4 _dispatch_workloop_worker_thread + 692 (queue.c:6859) 12 libsystem_pthread.dylib 0x00000001ec0623b8 _pthread_wqthread + 292 (pthread.c:2696) 13 libsystem_pthread.dylib 0x00000001ec0618c0 start_wqthread + 8 (:-1) Can anyone provide insights into what might be causing libquic to access an invalid address in this context? Any help or suggestions for further diagnostics would be greatly appreciated.

Hello Apple Support Team, We are seeing a production crash on iOS 26 devices that appears to originate from Apple system frameworks rather than application code. 1. Crash Details OS Version: iOS 26.x App built with: Xcode 16 Devices: Multiple models (not device-specific) Exception Type: SIGSEGV SEGV_ACCERR Fault Address: 0x0000000000000100 Crashed Thread: 4 (network background queue) Crash trace summary: Last Exception : 0 libobjc.A.dylib _objc_release_x8 + 8 1 libboringssl.dylib _nw_protocol_boringssl_deallocate_options + 92 2 Network 0x000000019695207c 0x00000001968dc000 + 483452 3 libswiftCore.dylib __swift_release_dealloc + 56 4 libswiftCore.dylib bool swift::RefCounts<swift::RefCountBitsT<(swift::RefCountInlinedness)1> >::doDecrementSlow<(swift::PerformDeinit)1>(swift::RefCountBitsT<(swift::RefCountInlinedness)1>, unsigned int) + 152 5 Network 0x0000000196951f6c 0x00000001968dc000 + 483180 6 Network 0x0000000196952000 0x00000001968dc000 + 483328 7 libswiftCore.dylib __swift_release_dealloc + 56 8 libswiftCore.dylib bool swift::RefCounts<swift::RefCountBitsT<(swift::RefCountInlinedness)1> >::doDecrementSlow<(swift::PerformDeinit)1>(swift::RefCountBitsT<(swift::RefCountInlinedness)1>, unsigned int) + 152 9 libswiftCore.dylib void multiPayloadEnumFN<&handleRefCountsDestroy>(swift::TargetMetadata<swift::InProcess> const*, swift::LayoutStringReader1&, unsigned long&, unsigned char*) + 248 10 libswiftCore.dylib swift::swift_cvw_arrayDestroy(swift::OpaqueValue*, unsigned long, unsigned long, swift::TargetMetadata<swift::InProcess> const*) + 1172 11 libswiftCore.dylib _$sSp12deinitialize5countSvSi_tF + 40 12 CollectionsInternal ___swift_instantiateGenericMetadata + 1236 13 CollectionsInternal ___swift_instantiateGenericMetadata + 388 14 CollectionsInternal ___swift_instantiateGenericMetadata + 1044 15 libswiftCore.dylib __swift_release_dealloc + 56 16 libswiftCore.dylib bool swift::RefCounts<swift::RefCountBitsT<(swift::RefCountInlinedness)1> >::doDecrementSlow<(swift::PerformDeinit)1>(swift::RefCountBitsT<(swift::RefCountInlinedness)1>, unsigned int) + 152 17 Network 0x000000019695f9fc 0x00000001968dc000 + 539132 18 Network 0x000000019695f9bc 0x00000001968dc000 + 539068 19 libswiftCore.dylib __swift_release_dealloc + 56 20 libswiftCore.dylib bool swift::RefCounts<swift::RefCountBitsT<(swift::RefCountInlinedness)1> >::doDecrementSlow<(swift::PerformDeinit)1>(swift::RefCountBitsT<(swift::RefCountInlinedness)1>, unsigned int) + 152 21 libswiftCore.dylib swift_cvw_destroyImpl(swift::OpaqueValue*, swift::TargetMetadata<swift::InProcess> const*) + 212 22 Network 0x0000000196def5d8 0x00000001968dc000 + 5322200 23 Network 0x0000000196ded130 0x00000001968dc000 + 5312816 24 libswiftCore.dylib __swift_release_dealloc + 56 25 libswiftCore.dylib bool swift::RefCounts<swift::RefCountBitsT<(swift::RefCountInlinedness)1> >::doDecrementSlow<(swift::PerformDeinit)1>(swift::RefCountBitsT<(swift::RefCountInlinedness)1>, unsigned int) + 152 26 Network 0x000000019695fde0 0x00000001968dc000 + 540128 27 libobjc.A.dylib object_cxxDestructFromClass(objc_object*, objc_class*) + 116 28 libobjc.A.dylib objc_destructInstance_nonnull_realized(objc_object*) + 76 29 libobjc.A.dylib __objc_rootDealloc + 72 30 Network 0x000000019695f99c 0x00000001968dc000 + 539036 31 Network 0x000000019695fae4 0x00000001968dc000 + 539364 32 Network 0x0000000196b078b8 0x00000001968dc000 + 2275512 33 libobjc.A.dylib object_cxxDestructFromClass(objc_object*, objc_class*) + 116 34 libobjc.A.dylib objc_destructInstance_nonnull_realized(objc_object*) + 76 35 libobjc.A.dylib __objc_rootDealloc + 72 36 Network 0x0000000196b07658 0x00000001968dc000 + 2274904 37 Network 0x00000001968e51d4 nw_queue_context_async_if_needed + 92 38 Network 0x0000000197686ea0 0x00000001968dc000 + 14331552 39 libswiftCore.dylib swift::swift_cvw_arrayDestroy(swift::OpaqueValue*, unsigned long, unsigned long, swift::TargetMetadata<swift::InProcess> const*) + 436 40 libswiftCore.dylib _$sSp12deinitialize5countSvSi_tF + 40 41 CollectionsInternal ___swift_instantiateGenericMetadata + 1236 42 CollectionsInternal ___swift_instantiateGenericMetadata + 388 43 CollectionsInternal ___swift_instantiateGenericMetadata + 1044 44 libswiftCore.dylib __swift_release_dealloc + 56 45 libswiftCore.dylib bool swift::RefCounts<swift::RefCountBitsT<(swift::RefCountInlinedness)1> >::doDecrementSlow<(swift::PerformDeinit)1>(swift::RefCountBitsT<(swift::RefCountInlinedness)1>, unsigned int) + 152 46 Network 0x000000019694a010 0x00000001968dc000 + 450576 47 libobjc.A.dylib object_cxxDestructFromClass(objc_object*, objc_class*) + 116 48 libobjc.A.dylib objc_destructInstance_nonnull_realized(objc_object*) + 76 49 libobjc.A.dylib __objc_rootDealloc + 72 50 Network 0x0000000196a330e0 0x00000001968dc000 + 1405152 51 Network 0x00000001974378e0 0x00000001968dc000 + 11909344 52 Network 0x0000000196a17178 0x00000001968dc000 + 1290616 53 libdispatch.dylib __dispatch_call_block_and_release + 32 54 libdispatch.dylib __dispatch_client_callout + 16 55 libdispatch.dylib _dispatch_workloop_invoke.cold.4 + 32 56 libdispatch.dylib __dispatch_workloop_invoke + 1980 57 libdispatch.dylib __dispatch_root_queue_drain_deferred_wlh + 292 58 libdispatch.dylib __dispatch_workloop_worker_thread + 692 59 libsystem_pthread.dylib __pthread_wqthread + 292 ------ Exception Type: SIGSEGV SEGV_ACCERR Exception Codes: fault addr: 0x0000000000000100 Crashed Thread: 4 2. Behavior & Context The crash occurs during normal HTTPS networking using standard URLSession (no direct usage of Network.framework nor boringssl APIs). It appears to be triggered during QUIC connection establishment or TLS fallback. The stack trace contains no application code frames — all symbols are from system libraries. The crash strongly indicates double-free, over-release, or dangling pointer inside nw_protocol_boringssl_options deallocation. 3. Questions for Apple Is this a known issue in iOS 26 within Network.framework / boringssl related to nw_protocol_boringssl_deallocate_options? What is the root cause of the over‑release / invalid objc_release in this path? Is there a workaround we can implement from the app side (e.g., disabling QUIC, adjusting TLS settings, or queue configuration)? Do you have a target iOS version or patch where this issue will be fixed? We can provide full crash logs and additional metrics upon request. 4. Additional Information Developed using Swift 5, with a deployment target of iOS 12+. Thank you for your support.

We have a VPN app that uses NEPacketTunnelProvider with includeAllNetworks = true. We've encountered an issue where push notifications are not delivered over Wi-Fi while the tunnel is active in a pre-MFA quarantine state (tunnel is up but traffic is blocked on server side), regardless of whether excludeAPNS is set to true or false. Observed behavior Wi-Fi excludeAPNS = true - Notifications not delivered Wi-Fi excludeAPNS = false - Notifications not delivered Cellular excludeAPNS = true - Notifications delivered Cellular excludeAPNS = false - Notifications not delivered On cellular, the behavior matches our expectations: setting excludeAPNS = true allows APNS traffic to bypass the tunnel and notifications arrive; setting it to false routes APNS through the tunnel and notifications are blocked (as expected for a non-forwarding tunnel). On Wi-Fi, notifications fail to deliver in both cases. Our question Is this expected behavior when includeAllNetworks is enabled on Wi-Fi, or is this a known issue / bug with APNS delivery? Is there something else in the Wi-Fi networking path that includeAllNetworks affects beyond routing, which could prevent APNS from functioning even when the traffic is excluded from the tunnel? Sample Project Below is the minimal code that reproduces this issue. The project has two targets: a main app and a Network Extension. The tunnel provider captures all IPv4 and IPv6 traffic via default routes but does not forward packets — simulating a pre-MFA quarantine state. The main app configures the tunnel with includeAllNetworks = true and provides a UI toggle for excludeAPNS. PacketTunnelProvider.swift (Network Extension target): import NetworkExtension class PacketTunnelProvider: NEPacketTunnelProvider { override func startTunnel(options: [String : NSObject]?, completionHandler: @escaping (Error?) -> Void) { let settings = NEPacketTunnelNetworkSettings(tunnelRemoteAddress: "127.0.0.1") let ipv4 = NEIPv4Settings(addresses: ["198.51.100.1"], subnetMasks: ["255.255.255.0"]) ipv4.includedRoutes = [NEIPv4Route.default()] settings.ipv4Settings = ipv4 let ipv6 = NEIPv6Settings(addresses: ["fd00::1"], networkPrefixLengths: [64]) ipv6.includedRoutes = [NEIPv6Route.default()] settings.ipv6Settings = ipv6 let dns = NEDNSSettings(servers: ["198.51.100.1"]) settings.dnsSettings = dns settings.mtu = 1400 setTunnelNetworkSettings(settings) { error in if let error = error { completionHandler(error) return } self.readPackets() completionHandler(nil) } } private func readPackets() { packetFlow.readPackets { [weak self] packets, protocols in self?.readPackets() } } override func stopTunnel(with reason: NEProviderStopReason, completionHandler: @escaping () -> Void) { completionHandler() } override func handleAppMessage(_ messageData: Data, completionHandler: ((Data?) -> Void)?) { if let handler = completionHandler { handler(messageData) } } override func sleep(completionHandler: @escaping () -> Void) { completionHandler() } override func wake() { } } ContentView.swift (Main app target) — trimmed to essentials: import SwiftUI import NetworkExtension struct ContentView: View { @State private var excludeAPNs = false @State private var manager: NETunnelProviderManager? var body: some View { VStack { Toggle("Exclude APNs", isOn: $excludeAPNs) .onChange(of: excludeAPNs) { Task { await saveAndReload() } } Button("Connect") { Task { await toggleVPN() } } } .padding() .task { await loadManager() } } private func loadManager() async { let managers = try? await NETunnelProviderManager.loadAllFromPreferences() if let existing = managers?.first { manager = existing } else { let m = NETunnelProviderManager() let proto = NETunnelProviderProtocol() proto.providerBundleIdentifier = "<your-extension-bundle-id>" proto.serverAddress = "127.0.0.1" proto.includeAllNetworks = true proto.excludeAPNs = excludeAPNs m.protocolConfiguration = proto m.localizedDescription = "TestVPN" m.isEnabled = true try? await m.saveToPreferences() try? await m.loadFromPreferences() manager = m } if let proto = manager?.protocolConfiguration as? NETunnelProviderProtocol { excludeAPNs = proto.excludeAPNs } } private func saveAndReload() async { guard let manager else { return } if let proto = manager.protocolConfiguration as? NETunnelProviderProtocol { proto.includeAllNetworks = true proto.excludeAPNs = excludeAPNs } manager.isEnabled = true try? await manager.saveToPreferences() try? await manager.loadFromPreferences() } private func toggleVPN() async { guard let manager else { return } if manager.connection.status == .connected { manager.connection.stopVPNTunnel() } else { await saveAndReload() try? manager.connection.startVPNTunnel() } } } Steps to reproduce Build and run the sample project with above code on a physical iOS device. Connect to a Wi-Fi network. Set excludeAPNS = true using the toggle and tap Connect. Send a push notification to the device to a test app with remote notification capability (e.g., via a test push service or the push notification console). Observe that the notification is not delivered. Disconnect. Switch to cellular. Reconnect with the same settings. Send the same push notification — observe that it is delivered. Environment iOS 26.2 Xcode 26.2 Physical device (iPhone 15 Pro)

Hi All, I am working on a macOS System Extension using Apple’s Network Extension Framework, designed to observe and log network activity at multiple layers. The system extension is currently stable and working as expected for HTTP and DNS traffic with 3 providers, getting Socket, HTTP, and DNS logs. Current Architecture Overview The project consists of two Xcode targets: 1. Main App Process Responsible for: Managing system extension lifecycle (activation, configuration) Establishing IPC (XPC) communication with extensions Receiving structured logs from extensions Writing logs efficiently to disk using a persistent file handle Uses: OSSystemExtensionManager NEFilterManager, NETransparentProxyManager, NEDNSProxyManager NWPathMonitor for network availability handling Persistent logging mechanism (FileHandle) 2. System Extension Process Contains three providers, all running within a single system extension process: a) Content Filter (NEFilterDataProvider) Captures socket-level metadata Extracts: PID via audit token Local/remote endpoints Protocol (TCP/UDP, IPv4/IPv6) Direction (inbound/outbound) Sends structured JSON logs via shared IPC b) Transparent Proxy (NETransparentProxyProvider) Intercepts TCP flows Creates a corresponding NWConnection to the destination Captures both HTTP and HTTPS traffic, sends it to HTTPFlowLogger file which bypasses if it's not HTTP traffic. Uses a custom HTTPFlowLogger: Built using SwiftNIO library (NIO HTTP1) Parses up to HTTP/1.1 traffic Handles streaming, headers, and partial body capture (with size limits) Maintains per-flow state and lifecycle management Logs structured HTTP data via shared IPC c) DNS Proxy (NEDNSProxyProvider) Intercepts UDP DNS traffic Forwards queries to upstream resolver (system DNS or fallback) Maintains shared UDP connection Tracks pending requests using DNS IDs Parses DNS packets (queries + responses) using a custom parser Logs structured DNS metadata via shared IPC Shared Component: IPCConnection Single bidirectional XPC channel used by all providers Handles: App → Extension registration Extension → App logging Uses Mach service defined in system extension entitlements Project Structure NetworkExtension (Project) │ ├── NetworkExtension (Target 1: Main App) │ ├── AppDelegate.swift │ ├── Assets.xcassets │ ├── Info.plist │ ├── NetworkExtension.entitlements │ ├── Main.storyboard │ └──ViewController.swift │ ├── SystemExtensions (Target 2: Extension Process) │ ├── common/ │ │ ├── IPCConnection.swift │ │ └── main.swift │ │ │ ├── DNSProxyProvider/ │ │ ├──DNSDataParser.swift │ │ └──DNSProxyProvider.swift (DNS Proxy) │ │ │ ├── FilterDataProvider/ │ │ └── FilterDataProvider.swift │ │ │ ├── TransparentProxyProvider/ │ │ ├── HTTPLogParser.swift │ │ ├── LogDataModel.swift │ │ └──TransparentProxyProvider.swift │ │ │ ├── Info.plist │ └── SystemExtensions.entitlements │ Current Capabilities Unified logging pipeline across: Socket-level metadata HTTP traffic (HTTP/1.1) DNS queries/responses Efficient log handling using persistent file descriptors Stable IPC communication between app and extensions Flow-level tracking and lifecycle management Selective filtering (e.g., bypass rules for specific IPs) What's the best approach to add TLS Inspection with MITM proxy setup? Some context and constraints: Existing implementation handles HTTP parsing and should remain unchanged (Swift-based). I’m okay with bypassing apps/sites that use certificate pinning (e.g., banking apps) and legitimate sites. Performance is important — I want to avoid high CPU utilization. I’m relatively new to TLS inspection and MITM proxy design. Questions Is it a good idea to implement TLS inspection within a system extension, or does that typically introduce significant complexity and performance overhead? As NETransparentProxyProvider already intercepting HTTPS traffic, can we redirect it to a separate processing pipeline (e.g., another file/module), while keeping the existing HTTP parser(HTTPFlowLogger - HTTP only parser) intact? What are the recommended architectural approaches for adding HTTPS parsing via MITM in a performant way? Are there best practices for selectively bypassing pinned or sensitive domains while still inspecting other traffic? Any guidance on avoiding common pitfalls (e.g., certificate handling, connection reuse, latency issues)? I’m looking for a clean, maintainable approach to integrate HTTPS inspection into my existing system without unnecessary complexity or performance degradation. Please let me know if any additional details from my side would help in suggesting the most appropriate approach. Thanks in advance for your time and insights—I really appreciate it.

Hello all, WWDC 2025 introduced Wi‑Fi Aware (NAN) support on iOS 26 for peer-to-peer discovery and direct connections, but I noticed macOS Tahoe doesn’t include it. I couldn’t find any references to Wi‑Fi Aware APIs or framework support in the macOS SDK. Is Apple planning to bring Wi‑Fi Aware to macOS? If so, will this come in a future update to macOS 26 (e.g., 26.x), or is it deferred to macOS 27 or beyond? Thanks for any insights!

Hello, I'm trying to build the sample app from Building peer-to-peer apps that demonstrates Wi-Fi Aware. Upon downloading the example source code, opening it in Xcode 26.0 beta, and building the app, the compiler fails with: DeviceDiscoveryPairingView.swift:8:8 No such module 'DeviceDiscoveryUI' Is this a known issue? I know that DeviceDiscoveryUI was previously only a tvOS capability. Thanks

Recently, my application was having trouble sending udp messages after it was reinstalled. The cause of the problem was initially that I did not grant local network permissions when I reinstalled, I was aware of the problem, so udp worked fine after I granted permissions. However, the next time I repeat the previous operation, I also do not grant local network permissions, and then turn it back on in the Settings, and udp does not work properly (no messages can be sent, the system version and code have not changed). Fortunately, udp worked after rebooting the phone, and more importantly, I was able to repeat the problem many times. So I want to know if the process between when I re-uninstall the app and deny local network permissions, and when I turn it back on in Settings, is that permissions have been granted normally, and not fake, and not required a reboot to reset something for udp to take effect. I'm not sure if it's the system, or if it's a similar situation as described here, hopefully that will help me find out