Context: We are using UIKit to provide accessibility in our app for our iOS users. Our app majorly contains documents/books that user can read. Issue: The issue is VoiceOver is skipping the lines given to it when there are some leading spaces in it. We have observed this issue in different languages. This is only happening for line granularity, other granularities seems to be working as expected. Implementation: We are using below API's to provide line content to voice over. UIAccessibilityReadingContent - accessibilityPageContent - accessibilityFrameForLineNumber - accessibilityContentForLineNumber We are creating UIAccessibilityElement objects to pass to VoiceOver and each UIAccessibilityElement implements UIAccessibilityReadingContent to provide readable content. We also use below APIs to cross element boundaries for all granular navigations. accessibilityNextTextNavigationElement accessibilityPreviousTextNavigationElement We want to know whether skipping the line when provided with leading spaces is expected or a bug in UIKit.

Hi everyone, I’ve been analyzing the current state of Sign Language accessibility tools, and I noticed a significant gap in learning tools: we lack real-time feedback for students (e.g., "Is my hand position correct?"). Most current solutions rely on 2D video processing, which struggles with depth perception and occlusion (hand-over-hand or hand-over-face gestures), which are critical in Sign Language grammar. I'd like to propose/discuss an architecture leveraging the current LiDAR + Neural Engine capabilities found in iPhone devices to solve this. The Concept: Skeleton-based Normalization Instead of training ML models on raw video frames (which introduces noise from lighting, skin tone, and clothing), we could use ARKit's Body Tracking to abstract the input. Capture: Use ARKit/LiDAR to track the user's upper body and hand joints in 3D space. Data Normalization: Extract only the vector coordinates (X, Y, Z of joints). This creates a "clean" dataset, effectively normalizing the user regardless of physical appearance. Comparison: Feed these vectors into a CoreML model trained on "Reference Skeletons" (recorded by native signers). Feedback Loop: The app calculates the geometric distance between the user's pose and the reference pose to provide specific correction (e.g., "Raise your elbow 10 degrees"). Why this approach? Solves Occlusion: LiDAR handles depth much better than standard RGB cameras when hands cross the body. Privacy: We are processing coordinates, not video streams. Efficiency: Comparing vector sequences is computationally cheaper than video analysis, preserving battery life. Has anyone experimented with using ARKit Body Anchors specifically for comparing complex gesture sequences against a stored "correct" database? I believe this "Skeleton First" approach is the key to scalable Sign Language education apps. Looking forward to hearing your thoughts.

Is the accessibility feature, voice command recording available on the Apple Vision Pro? It does not start on my device. The Apple Vision Pro is on 26.1. Regular single voice commands work on the Apple Vision Pro. Recording commands worked on other devices. (iPad and iPhone)

Hi everyone — I’m implementing the new Hearing Device Support API described here: https://developer.apple.com/documentation/accessibility/hearing-device-support I have MFi hearing aids paired and visible under Settings → Accessibility → Hearing Devices, and I’ve added the com.apple.developer.hearing.aid.app entitlement (and also tested with Wireless Accessory Configuration: https://developer.apple.com/documentation/bundleresources/entitlements/com.apple.external-accessory.wireless-configuration ). com.apple.developer.hearing.aid.app xxxxx but the app won't even compile with this entitlement Problem NotificationCenter.default.addObserver(...) for pairedUUIDsDidChangeNotification never fires — not on app launch, not after pairing/unpairing, and not after reconnecting the hearing aids. Because the notification never triggers, calls like: HearingDeviceSession.shared.pairedDevices always return an empty list. What I expected According to the docs, the notification should be posted whenever paired device UUIDs change, and the session should expose those devices — but nothing happens. Questions Does the hearing.aid.app entitlement require special approval from Apple beyond adding it to the entitlements file? Is there a way to verify that iOS is actually honoring this entitlement? Has anyone successfully received this notification on a real device? Any help or confirmation would be greatly appreciated.

Hello everyone, I am currently evaluating my app's accessibility features to accurately display the "Accessibility" information on the App Store. I have encountered two specific issues regarding Voice Control testing and would appreciate any guidance. Voice Command for "Stop Recording" According to the evaluation criteria, if an app supports audio recording or dictation, users must be able to start and stop recording using only their voice. Behavior: I can successfully trigger the recording using the command "Start Recording". However, I cannot find a command to stop it. Commands like "Stop Recording" or "Stop" are not recognized by the system. Question: Is there a specific standard voice command intended for stopping a recording? Item Number Overlays on Non-Interactive Web Elements (WKWebView) I noticed an inconsistency between native views and web content regarding Voice Control item numbering. Behavior: When testing web content within the app (WKWebView) or in Safari, Voice Control displays item number overlays on non-interactive text elements (such as standard or tags). In native views, static labels do not receive item numbers. Question: Is this expected behavior for web content? Since these elements are not interactive, I am unsure if this should be considered a bug (fail) or an acceptable exception for the accessibility evaluation. Has anyone experienced similar issues or know the correct criteria for these cases? Thank you.

Since the last bet upgrade for iPad to 26.3 labels have disappeared. Going into system/accessibility the toggle setting for labels makes no difference whether on or off. labels are permanently not there/missing.

after the 26.3 beta update, my mouse has been having major problems with transparency, have to keep going to reset colors in display, but it doesn't hold, anyone else?

I had a VoiceOver user point out an issue with my app that I’ve definitely known about but have never been able to fix. I thought that I had filed feedback for it but it looks like I didn’t. Before I do I’m hoping someone has some insight. With Swift Charts when I tap part of a chart it summarizes the three hours and then you can swipe vertically to hear it read out details of each hour. For example, the Y-Axis is the amount of precipitation for the hour and the X-Axis is the hours of the day. The units aren't being read in the summary but they are for individual hours when you vertical swipe. The summary says something such as "varies between 0.012 and 0.082". In the AXChartDescriptor I’ve tried everything I can think of, including adding a label to the Y axis in the DataPoint but nothing seems to work in getting that summary to include units. With a vertical swipe it seems to just be using my accessibility label and value (like I would expect).

Scrivo questo post per farmi notare meglio, il 6 marzo ho mandato un feedback (poi aggiornato oggi, 18 marzo) tramite l‘app Feedback installata su iPhone chiedo a chiunque lavori all’interno di Apple, specialmente agli ingegneri informatici che si occupano delle funzioni di accessibilità di iOS 26 di visionare questo Feedback per aumentare ancora di più le opzioni di accessibilità degli utenti Apple, vi lascio di seguito l’ID del Feedback, grazie mille per il lavoro che fate FB22142615

Dear Apple Support, I would like to raise a concern regarding the behavior of the “Desktop & Documents Folders” feature in iCloud Drive. From a business and development standpoint, the fact that folders may be automatically moved or created without clear and explicit user awareness is quite concerning. File system behavior is something users generally expect to remain predictable and fully under their control. In particular, when working in development environments, even small and unintended changes to folder structures can lead to issues such as broken file paths, build errors, or inconsistencies in project setups. The possibility that such changes may occur automatically introduces an element of uncertainty that is difficult to manage in professional workflows. Additionally, there are security considerations. For example, if sensitive files such as configuration data or API keys are temporarily stored on the Desktop, the possibility that they could be unintentionally synced to the cloud raises valid concerns. Even if safeguards exist, the lack of clear visibility and explicit confirmation makes it difficult to confidently assess and manage risk. Overall, the current behavior gives the impression that folder operations may occur without sufficient transparency. From a business perspective, this impacts trust, predictability, and operational reliability. I would appreciate consideration of the following improvements: Clear and explicit communication before any folder movement or creation occurs A strictly opt-in model with unambiguous user consent Greater visibility into when and how synchronization affects local files Options to ensure fully local control over specific directories Thank you for your attention to this matter. I hope this feedback will contribute to improving the reliability and transparency of the feature. Sincerely,